Forensic odontology: The prosthetic ID


Poonam Prakash
Kirandeep Singh
S Bhandari


The term “forensic science” involves forensic (or forensis, in Latin), which means a public discussion or debate. In a more modern context, however, forensic applies to courts or the judicial system. Combine that with science, and forensic science means applying scientific methods and processes to solving crimes. People can be identified by their fingerprints, foot creases, and from traces of their DNA from blood, skin, hair, saliva, and semen by DNA analysis. However, in situations where these records are unavailable or unusable due to the nature of the disaster, the dental records and aids prove to be useful for victim identification. This article aims at highlighting the importance of the dental records and the forensic odontology in the accurate and efficient identification of the conflict victims or deceased to serve as an important adjunct to the forensic medicine in a simplified manner.


How to Cite
Poonam Prakash, Kirandeep Singh, & S Bhandari. (2019). Forensic odontology: The prosthetic ID. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 11(3), 113–117.


  1. Goldman AD. The scope of forensic dentistry. In: Cottone JA,
  2. Standish SM, editors. Outline of Forensic Dentistry. Chicago:
  3. Yearbook Medical Publishers; 1982. p. 15‑9.
  4. Krogman WM, Iscan MY. The Human Skeleton in Forensic
  5. Medicine. 2nd ed. Springfield Illinois: Charles Thomas Publisher;
  6. p. 189‑243.
  7. Rao CV. Role of forensic odontologist in medicolegal investigation.
  8. J Indian Dent Assoc 1979;51:81‑4.
  9. Sweet D. Why a dentist for identification. Dent Clin North Am
  10. ;45:237‑49.
  11. Hinchliffe J. Forensic odontology, Part 1. Dental identification. Br
  12. Dent J 2011;210:219‑24.
  13. Sweet D, DiZinno JA. Personal identification through dental evidence
  14. tooth fragments to DNA. J Calif Dent Assoc 1996;24:35‑42.
  15. Ambarkova V, Gali I, Vodanovi M, Bioina‑Lukenda D, Brki H.
  16. Dental age estimation using Demirjian and Willems methods: Cross
  17. sectional study on children from the Former Yugoslav Republic of
  18. Macedonia. Forensic Sci Int 2014;234:187.e1‑7.
  19. Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age
  20. estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2001;19:9‑17.
  21. Frush JP, Fisher RD. How dentogenic restorations interpret the sex
  22. factor. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:160‑72.
  23. Khamis MF, Taylor JA, Malik SN, Townsend GC. Odontometric
  24. sex variation in Malaysians with application to sex prediction.
  25. Forensic Sci Int 2014;234:183.e1‑7.
  26. Barr ML, Bertram LF, Lindsay HA. The morphology of the nerve
  27. cell nucleus, according to sex. Anat Rec 1950;107:283‑97.
  28. Nakahori Y, Takenaka O, Nakagome Y. A human X‑Y homologous
  29. region encodes amelogenin. Genomics 1991;9:264‑9.
  30. Edgar HJ. Estimation of ancestry using dental morphological
  31. characteristics. J Forensic Sci 2013;58 Suppl 1:S3‑8.
  32. Barsley R, Freeman A, Metcalf R, Senn D, Wright F. Bitemark
  33. analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:444.
  34. Rothwell BR. Bite marks in forensic dentistry: A review of legal,
  35. scientific issues. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:223‑32.
  36. Nagalaxmi V, Ugrappa S, Naga JM, Lalitha C, Maloth KN,
  37. Kodangal S. Cheiloscopy, palatoscopy and odontometrics in sex
  38. prediction and dis‑crimination: A comparative study. Open Dent
  39. J 2015;8:269‑9.
  40. Rath R, Reginald BA. Palatal rugae: An effective marker in
  41. population differentiation. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014;6:46‑50.
  42. Ohira H, Yamamuro Y, Kitagawa Y, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto I,
  43. Yamada Y. Effective appropriate use of dental remains and
  44. forensic DNA testing for personal identity confirmation. Leg
  45. Med (Tokyo) 2009;11:S560‑2.
  46. Aguloglu S, Zortuk M, Beydemir K. Denture bar‑coding: A new
  47. horizon. Br Dent J 2009;206:589‑90.
  48. Colvenkar SS, Gopal S. Microsecure digital card: A novel method
  49. for denture identification. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014;6:183.
  50. Colvenkar SS. Lenticular card: A new method for denture
  51. identification. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21:112.
  52. Mahoorkar S, Jain A. Denture identification using unique
  53. identification authority of India barcode. J Forensic Dent Sci
  54. ;5:60.
  55. Dimashkieh MR, Al‑Shammery AR. Engraved fixed restorations
  56. to facilitate identification in forensic dentistry. J Prosthet Dent
  57. ;69:533‑5.