Attrition – A Criteria in Estimating the Age


A. Ravi Prakash
A. Vikram Simha Reddy
M. RajiniKanth
G. Sreenath
S. Md. Khaja Hussain
D. P. Sree Harsha


Context: With respect to the recognition of an individual in forensic circumstances age assessment is an essential aspect. Teeth are considered to be least destructible part of the body under most conditions occurring in the nature like mass disasters. As the age advances, there will be physiological wearing away of the tooth due to tooth - tooth contacts, as in case of mastication. By knowing the level of attrition, age of an individual can be estimated. Microscopic investigation may not be achievable in certain instances and assessment of age relies on the sole examination of tooth by attrition. Aims: The aim of the research was meant to evaluate the age of individuals using Average Stage of Attrition (ASA) and Gustafson’s method and comparing efficacy of both the methods. Methods and Material: The study sample constituted 60 participants. Dental caries, restored crowns and patients with bruxism were excluded. The patients examined were in the age group of 35-60 years. Scores were evaluated by using Gustafson’s method and Average stage of attrition method. Statistical Analysis used: Regression Analysis. Results: The average stages of attrition and Gustafson’s scoring criteria were evaluated by conferring with the graduation standards. The data was collected and regression analyses were carried out for both the methods. By regression analysis, four regression equations for each method were obtained. Evaluation of attrition level and its accuracy in estimating the age by ASA method is more reliable than Gustafson’s attrition scoring.


How to Cite
Prakash, A. R., Reddy, A. V. S. ., RajiniKanth, M., Sreenath, G., Hussain, S. M. K., & Harsha, D. P. S. (2021). Attrition – A Criteria in Estimating the Age. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 13(1), 24–29.


  1. Jain N. Textbook of forensic odontology. First edition 2013. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 18-19.
  2. Gustafson G. Age determinations on teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1950; 41:45 54. PMid:15428197 DOI:
  3. Li C, Ji G. Age estimation from the permanent molar in northeast China by the method of average stage of attrition. Forensic Sci Int. 1995; 75:185-96. DOI:
  4. Ajmal M, Mody B, Kumar G. Age estimation using three established methods. A study on Indian population. Forensic Sci Int. 2001; 122:150-4.
  5. Ball J. A critique of age estimation using attrition as the sole indicator. Journal Forensic Odontostomatol. 2002; 20(2):38-42.
  6. Kashyap VK, Koteswara Rao NR. A modified Gustafson method of age estimation from teeth. Forensic Sci Int. 1990; 47:237 47. DOI:
  7. Santini, Land, Raab. The accuracy of simple ordinal scoring of tooth attrition in age assessment. Forensic Science International. 1990; 48:175-84. DOI:
  8. D'Incau E, Couture C, Maureille B. Human tooth wear in the past and the present: Tribological mechanisms, scoring systems, dental and skeletal compensations. Arch Oral Biol. 2012; 57:214-29. PMid:21920497 DOI:
  9. Richter S, Eliasson ST. Erosive and mechanical tooth wear in viking age icelanders. Dentistry Journal. 2017; 5(3):24. PMid:29563430 PMCid:PMC5806945 DOI:
  10. 10. Ajmal M, Mody B, Kumar G. Age estimation using three established methods. A study on Indian population. Forensic Sci. Int. 2001; 122:150-4. DOI:
  11. Acharya AB, Kumar KK. Age estimation in Indians from extracted unsectioned teeth. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011; 212:275. e1-275.e50 PMid:21764231 DOI:
  12. Narayan VK, Varsha VK, Girish HC, Murgod S. Stereomicroscopic study on unsectioned extracted teeth. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017; 9:157-64.
  13. Tomenchuk J, Mayhall JT. A correlation of tooth wear and age among modern Igloolik Eskimos. American Journal Phys Anthropology. 1979; 51(1):67-77. PMid:453346 DOI: