Assessment of palatal rugae patterns in Manipuri and Kerala population

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

R Surekha
Koneru Anila
Vikram Reddy
Santosh Hunasgi
Shamala Ravikumar
Neela Ramesh

Abstract

Background: Palatal rugae comprises three to seven ridges radiating out tangentially from the incisive papilla on the anterior part of the palate. These rugae patterns are studied for various reasons, mainly in the fields of anthropology, genetics, orthodontics, prosthodontics, and forensic science. Objective: To compare the palatal rugae pattern in two different populations (Manipuri and Kerala), and to assess the predominant pattern if any in the selected groups. Materials and Methods: Sixty maxillary study models (30 from each group including males and females) were examined in the age group ranging from 17 to 23 years. Palatal rugae pattern were analyzed on the right and left sides of the palate for total number, length, shape, direction, and unification. Results: After analyzing the rugae patterns in both the groups and between the two sides of the palate, the wavy pattern was found to be predominant followed by curved, straight, and circular in overall population. Manipuri population showed predominant curved shape than the Kerala population and was statistically significant. Females in general had slightly more rugae than males and the left side of the palate showed comparatively more number of rugae than on the right side. Conclusion: A statistically significant association between the shape of the rugae and population exists although, subtle. Parameters like direction and unification need more attention for better understanding.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
R Surekha, Koneru Anila, Vikram Reddy, Santosh Hunasgi, Shamala Ravikumar, & Neela Ramesh. (2012). Assessment of palatal rugae patterns in Manipuri and Kerala population. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 4(2), 93–96. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.109896

References

  1. Bansode SC, Kulkarni MM. Importance of palatal rugae in individual identification. J Forensic Dent 2009;1:77-81.
  2. Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, Parish T. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian Aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J 1997;42:129- 33.
  3. Sassouni V. Palatoprint and roentgenographic cephalometry as new method in human identification. J Forensic Sci 1957;52:977-82.
  4. Paliwal A, Wanjari S, Parwani R. Palatal rugoscopy: Establishing identity. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2:27-31.
  5. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal rugae pattern: A new classification. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1983;38:153-7.
  6. Thomas CJ.The post-natal microscopic anatomy of the palatal rugae in man. J Dent Assoc S Afr.1984;39:677-81.
  7. Lima OC. Rugoscopy. Rev Bras Med. 1968;25:806-7
  8. Swetha SK, Kalia S, Patil K, Mahima VG. Palatal rugae pattern in Mysorean and Tibetan populations. Indian J Dent Res 2005;16:51-5.
  9. Lysell L. Plicae transeverse and papilla incisive in man; a morphology and genetic study. Acta Odontol Scand 1955;13(Suppl. 18):5-137.
  10. El-fotoh MM, El-Sharkawy GZ. A study of palatal rugae pattern in an Egyptian population. Egypt Dent J 1998;44:3177-84.
  11. Nayak P, Acharya AB, Padmini AT, Kaveri H. Differences in the palatal rugae shape in two populations of India. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:977-82.
  12. Hauser G, Daponte A, Roberts MJ. Palatal rugae. J Anat 1989;165:237-49.
  13. English WR, Robison SF, Summitt JB, Oesterle LJ, Brannon RB, Morlang WM. Individuality of human palatal rugae. J Forensic Sci 1988;33:718-26.