A Comparative Analysis of Palatal Ruga Patterns among Gorkha and North-East Indian Population

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Amolika Choube
Anup Gopi
Madhusudan Astekar
Anukool Choube

Abstract

Background


Palatal rugae are resistant to changes due to trauma or aging.  Ruga patterns, being unique to each individual, are valuable for personal identification. The study aims to assess the applicability of palatoscopy for differentiation amongst North-east Indians and Gorkhas in India.


Materials and Methods


Sample comprised a total of 100 subjects divided into two groups of 50 each for Gorkha (group I) and North-east Indian (group II) population. Alginate impressions were made and models were obtained. Data was recorded after tracing palatal rugae on models. Analysis of rugae for number, side-wise distribution, shape, length, and direction was undertaken. Statistical analysis was carried out and probability value was obtained.


Results


After analyzing the rugae patterns in both the groups, total number of rugae was more in group I as compared to group II. Total number of rugae on right and left sides each was more in group I than in Group II. The curved pattern was found to be predominant in both groups. Divergent rugae were predominant in both groups. Maximum rugae were primary and were forwardly directed. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between groups for parameters assessed.


Conclusion


Palatoscopy independently was not able to differentiate between individuals of the two test populations. Palatoscopy may assist in the identification process in conjunction with cheiloscopy and intraoral photography. Palatoscopy, on the account of its stability and easy reproducibility, should be encouraged among dentists for maintenance of patient records for forensic identification.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Choube, A., Gopi, A., Astekar, M., & Choube, A. (2021). A Comparative Analysis of Palatal Ruga Patterns among Gorkha and North-East Indian Population. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 12(1). Retrieved from https://jfds.org/index.php/jfds/article/view/563

References

  1. Kanchan T, Krishan K. Personal Identification in Forensic Examinations. Anthropol. 2013;2(1):114.
  2. Cameron JM, Sims BG. Forensic Dentistry. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;1974.
  3. English WR, Ribison SF, Summit JB, Oesterle LJ, Brannon RB, Morlang WM. Individuality of Human Palatal Rugae. Journal of Forensic sciences. 1988;33(3):718-26.
  4. Babu GS, Bharath TS, Kumar NG. Characteristics of palatal rugae patterns in west Godavari population of India. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(10):2356‑9.
  5. Segelinck SL, Goldstein L. Forensic Application of Palatal Rugae in Dental identification. The Forensic Examiner Spring. 2005;14(1):44-7.
  6. Subba TB. Race, Identity and Nationality: Relocating Nepali Nationalism in India. Millennial Asia. 2018;9(1):6-18.
  7. Chetry SK. Nepalis in Assam: A Historical Perspective (1816-1985). Research Journal of Language, Literature and Humanities. 2016;3(3):22-5.
  8. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal rugae pattern: A new classification. J Dent Assoc S Afr. 1983;38(3):153-7.
  9. Lysell L. Plica palatinae transverse and papilla incisive in man. A morphological and genetic study. Acta Odont Scand. 1955;13(18):5-137.
  10. Jacob RF, Shalla CL. Postmortem identification of the edentulous deceased: denture tissue surface anatomy. J Forensic Sci. 1987;32(3):698-702.
  11. Muthusubramanian M, Limson KS, Julian R. Analysis of rugae in burn victims and cadavers to simulate rugae identification in cases of incineration and decomposition. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2005;23(1):26-9.
  12. Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, Parish T. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian Aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J. 1997;42(2):129-33.
  13. Kashima K. Comparative study of the palatal rugae and shape of the hard palatal in Japanese and Indian children. Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi. 1990;28(1):295-320.
  14. Shetty SK, Kalia S, Patil K, Mahima VG. Palatal rugae pattern in Mysorean and Tibetan populations. Indian J Dent Res. 2005;16(2):51-5.
  15. Reddy MV, Gautam SN, Rao HT, Gautam RN, Koganti R, Agarwal R. Comparison of Palatal Rugae Among North Indian, South Indian and Chinese Students of Manipal University. Adv Hum Biol. 2014;4(2):40-4.
  16. Kallianpur S, Desai A, Kasetty S, Sudheendra U, Joshi P. An anthropometric analysis of facial height, arch length, and palatal rugae in the Indian and Nepalese population. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2011;3(1):33-7.
  17. More CB, Patel PT, Peter R. Analysis of Palatal Rugae pattern in Indian and Nepalese population- a comparative study. J Oral Med, Oral Surg, Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;1(3):108-13.
  18. Bhattacharya JB. The Northeast: The evolution of the idea of a region. Studies in People’s History. 2018;5(1):65-71.
  19. Jain N. Northeast India’s Multi-Ethnicities: Dominant Issues and Problems. International Journal of Humanities & Social Science Studies. 2016;3(2):275-85.
  20. Preet K, Malhotra S, Shrivastava P, Jain T, Rawat S, Varte LR, et al. Genetic Diversity in Gorkhas: An Autosomal STR Study. Scientific Reports. 6. 10.1038/srep32494.
  21. Debnath M, Chaudhuri TK. Study of genetic relationships of Indian Gurkha population on the basis of HLA-A and B loci antigens. Int J Hum Gene. 2006;6(2):159-62.
  22. Agrawal S, Srivastava SK, Borkar M, Chaudhuri TK. Genetic affinities of north and northeastern populations of India: inference from HLA-based study. Tissue Antigens. 2008;72(2):120-30.