Knowledge and awareness of forensic odontology among dentists in India: A systematic review

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 1, 2016
https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.176954
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 8, Issue 1, January-April 2016

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ramandeep Gambhir
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Gian Sagar Dental College and Hospital, Ludhiana
Gurminder Singh
Department of Prosthodontics, Gian Sagar Dental College and Hospital, Ludhiana
Puneet Talwar
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Himachal Pradesh
Jaskaran Gambhir
Department of Corporate Relations, Fortis Hospital, Ludhiana
Vaibhav Munjal
Department of Pedodontics, National Dental College and Hospital, Punjab

Abstract

Forensic dentistry involves the processing, review, evaluation, and presentation of dental evidence with the purpose of contributing scientific and objective data to legal processes. The present, systematic review was conducted to assess knowledge and awareness of forensic odontology among dentists in India. A systematic review of relevant cross-sectional studies was conducted regarding the level of knowledge, awareness, and practical application of forensic odontology among dentists in India. Four out of 129 studies were finally included in the present review after conducting a search of both electronic and manual scientific databases. Potential biases were addressed and the relevant data were extracted by the concerned investigators. Almost all the subjects were familiar with the subject of forensic odontology in one of the study reports. Only 12% of dentists were maintaining complete dental records in the findings of another study. Only 4% of dentists reported to have contributed to the identification of victims in a mass disaster in yet another study. The findings of another study revealed that 40% of dental practitioners did not have the expertise to identify child abuse. The results of the present review showed that the knowledge and awareness level of subjects was inadequate and that there is considerable variation in the practice of forensic odontology among dentists. It is necessary to expose dentists to the basic principles and techniques of the subject.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Ramandeep Gambhir, Gurminder Singh, Puneet Talwar, Jaskaran Gambhir, & Vaibhav Munjal. (2016). Knowledge and awareness of forensic odontology among dentists in India: A systematic review. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 8(1), 02–06. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.176954
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Puerini SJ. Forensic odontology and the postmortem identification process. Med Health R I 2005;88:308-9.
  2. Singh K, Anandani C, Bhullar RK, Agrawal A, Chaudhary H, Thakral A. Teeth and their secrets-Forensic dentistry. J Forensic Res 2012;3:141.
  3. Shamim T. Forensic odontology. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2012;22:240-5.
  4. Sheikh S, Pallagatti S, Singla I, Gupta R. Postmortem Dental identification in the absence of anti‑mortem records‑a review. J Forensic Res 2011;2:132.
  5. Pandey A, Singh I, Pandey S, Vidya M. Role and responsibility of dentist as forensic odontologist. JK Pract 2012;17:80-2.
  6. Avon SL. Forensic odontology: The roles and responsibilities of the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70:453-8.
  7. Sansare K. Forensic odontology, historical perspective. Indian J Dent Res 1995;6:55‑7.
  8. Phillips VM. The role of forensic dentistry in South Africa. Med Law 1993;12:487-91.
  9. Kumar S, Dagli N. Forensic odontology- An area unexplored. J Int Oral Health 2014;6:i.
  10. Pramod JB, Marya A, Sharma V. Role of forensic odontologist in post mortem person identification. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9:522-30.
  11. Wright K, McDaid C. Reporting of article retractions in bibliographic databases and online journals. J Med Libr Assoc 2011;99:164‑7.
  12. STROBE Statement. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Switzerland; 2007. Available from: https://www.strobe-statement.org/index. php?id=available-checklists. [Last accessed on 2014 May 10].
  13. LiberatiA, AltmanDG, TetzlaffJ, MulrowC, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions. Explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:e1‑34.
  14. Sengupta S, Sharma V, Gupta V, Vij H, Vij R, Prabhat K. Forensic odontology as a victim identification tool in mass disasters: A feasibility study in the Indian scenario. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014;6:58‑61.
  15. Khare P, Chandra S, Raj V, Verma P, Subha G, Khare A. Status of forensic odontology in metro and in tier 2 city in urban India. J Forensic Dent Sci 2013;5:134-7.
  16. Shetty P, Raviprakash A. Forensic odontology in India, an oral pathologist’s perspective. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:23‑6.
  17. Preethi S, EinsteinA, Sivapathasundharam B. Awareness of forensic odontology among dental practitioners in Chennai: A knowledge, attitude and practice study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:63‑6.
  18. Charangowda BK. Dental records: An overview. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2:5-10.
  19. Hermsen KP, Johnson JD. A model for forensic dental education in the predoctoral dental school curriculum. J Dent Educ 2012;76:553‑61.