Maintaining dental records: Are we ready for forensic needs?

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 1, 2011
https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.92143
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 3, Issue 2, July-December 2011

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Madhusudan Astekar
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, PAHER University, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, Rajasthan
Swati Saawarn
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, People′s Denal Academy, Bhopal
Gayathri Ramesh
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, PAHER University, Pacific Dental College and Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, Rajasthan
Nisheeth Saawarn
Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, People′s College of Dental Sciences & Research Centre, Bhopal

Abstract

Context: Dental remains are usually the last to get destroyed among body parts after death. They may be useful for personal identification in cases of mass disasters and decomposed unidentified bodies. Dental records may help in the identification of suspects in criminal investigations and in medicolegal cases. Maintenance of dental records is legally mandatory in most of the European and American countries. Unfortunately, the law is not very clear in India, and the awareness is very poor. Aims: To assess the awareness regarding the dental record maintenance among dentists in Rajasthan, to deduce the quality of average dental records kept by them and to evaluate the potential use of their maintained records, in any of forensic or medicolegal cases. Settings and Design: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 100 dental practitioners of different cities in Rajasthan, India. Materials and Methods: Data were collected through a structured questionnaire, which was responded by the study population in the course of a telephonic interview. The questionnaire addressed on the mode of maintaining dental records in their regular practice. Statistical Analysis Used: The data so gathered were subjected for descriptive analysis. Results: As for knowledge or awareness about maintaining dental records, surprisingly a very low percentile (about 38%) of surveyed dentists maintained records. Sixty-two percent of the dentists were maintaining no records at all. Conclusion : Nonmaintenance or poor quality of records maintained indicates that the dentists in Rajasthan are not prepared for any kind of forensic and medicolegal need if it arises.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Madhusudan Astekar, Swati Saawarn, Gayathri Ramesh, & Nisheeth Saawarn. (2011). Maintaining dental records: Are we ready for forensic needs?. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 3(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.92143
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Charangowda BK. Dental records: An overview. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2:5-10.
  2. Lawney M. For the Record. Understanding Patient Record keeping. N Y State Dent J. 1998;64:34-43.
  3. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Clinical guideline on record-keeping. Pediatr Dent 2004;26(7 Suppl):134-9.
  4. Martin Garcia P, Rios Santos JV, Sequra Eqea JJ, Fernandez Palacin A, Bullon Fernandez P. Dental audit (I): Exact criteria of dental records; Results of a Phase - III study. Med Oral Pathol Oral Cir Bucal 2008;13:E407-13.
  5. Dierickx A, Seyler M, de Valck E, Wijffels J, Willems G. Dental records: A Belgium study. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2006;24:22-31.
  6. Dhawan R, Dhawan S. Legal aspects in dentistry. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2010;14:81-4.
  7. Maintenance of Records. Available from: http//: www.ida.org. in/DentalPracticeAccreditation/maintenanceofrecords.htm [Last accessed on 2010 Oct 18th].
  8. Consumer Protection Act and Medical Profession - The Legal Avenues Other Than CPA available from : http://www. medindia.net/indian_health_act/consumer_protection_act_ and_medical_profession_the_legal_avenues_other_than_cpa. htm#ixzz1bD6fGULC [Last cited on 2010 Oct. 18th].
  9. Osborn JB, Stoltenberg JL, Newell KJ, Osborn SC. Adequacy of dental records in clinical practice: A survey of dentists. J Dent Hyg 2000;74:297-306.
  10. Helminen SE, Vehkalahti M, Murtomaa H, Kekki P, Ketomäki TM. Quality evaluation of oral health record-keeping for Finnish young adults. Acta Odontol Scand 1998;56:288-92.
  11. Bansal YS, Singh D. Medico-legal aspects of informed consent. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2007;1:7-12.
  12. Delattre VF, Stimson PG. Self-assessment of the forensic value of dental records. J Forensic Sci 1999;44:906-9.
  13. Borrman H, Dahlbom U, Loyola E, René N. Quality evaluation of 10 years patient records in forensic odontology. Int J Legal Med 1995;108:100-4.
  14. Sakelliadis EI, Spiliopoulou CA, Papadodima SA. Forensic investigation of child victim with sexual abuse. Indian Pediatrics. 2009;46:144-51.
  15. Morgan RG. Quality evaluation of clinical records of a group of general dental practitioners entering a quality assurance programme. Br Dent J 2001;191:436-41.
  16. Ireland RS, Harris RV, Pealing R. Clinical record keeping by general dental practitioners piloting the Denplan ‘Excel’ Accreditation Programme. Br Dent J 2001;191:260-3.
  17. Pessian F, Beckett HA. Record keeping by undergraduate dental students: A clinical audit. Br Dent J 2004;197:703-5.
  18. Cole A, McMichael A. Audit of dental practice record-keeping: A PCT-coordinated clinical audit by Worcestershire dentists. Prim Dent Care 2009;16:85-93.
  19. Samadi FM, Bastian TS, Singh A, Jaiswal R. Dental records – A vital tool of forensic odontology. Medico-Legal Update 2009;9:14-5