Crown size and arch width dimension as an indicator in gender determination for a Puducherry population

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Juhi Gupta
M Daniel

Abstract

Introduction: Tooth morphometry is resistant to postmortem destruction and can be used as an adjunct in skeletal sex and age determination. Therefore, an attempt was made to compare mandibular canine index (MCI) and Pont's index for their level of accuracy in gender determination for a Puducherry population. Aims and Objectives: To evaluate crown size and arch width dimension for the Puducherry population using MCI and Pont's index. To compare the MCI and Pont's index, for the level of accuracy in gender determination and to validate its use as a forensic tool. Materials and Methods: One hundred and six participants (53 males and 53 females) in the age group of 18–25 years of the Puducherry population were included in the study. Their MCI and Pont's index were recorded. Results: The data obtained were subjected to paired t-test analysis. It was observed that right MCI was most accurate and molar index was least accurate in sex determination. Conclusion: MCI and Pont's index showed significant sexual dimorphism. They can be used as an adjunct to other tools for sex determination and identification of the person for the Puducherry population.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Juhi Gupta, & M Daniel. (2016). Crown size and arch width dimension as an indicator in gender determination for a Puducherry population. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 8(3), 120–125. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.195105

References

  1. Gorea K, Manish S. Odontometeric study of canines in Indian population for sex determination. JIndo Pac Acad Forensic Odontol 2010;1:34-7.
  2. Boaz K, Gupta C. Dimorphism in human maxillary and mandibular canine in establishment of gender. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:42-4.
  3. Mughal IA, Manzur F, Saqib AS. Mandibular canine index (MCI): Its role in determining gender. Prof Med J 2010;17:459‑63.
  4. YadavS, NagabhushanaD, RaoBB, MamathaGP. Mandibular canine index in establishing sex identity. Indian J Dent Res 2002;13:143‑6.
  5. AgnihotriG, GulatiM. Maxillary molar and premolar indices in North Indians: A dimorphic study. Internet J Biol Anthropol 2007;2:1-5.
  6. Schwartz GT, Miller ER, Gunnell GF. Developmental processes and canine dimorphism in primate evolution. J Hum Evol 2005;97- 103.
  7. Vodanovic M, Željko D, Njemirovskij V, Keros J, Hrvoje B. Odontometrics: A useful method for sex determination in an archaeological skeletal population? J Archaeol Sci 2007;34:905-13.
  8. Strujic M, Anic-Milosevic S, Mestrovic S, Slaj M. Tooth size discrepancy in orthodontic patients among different malocclusion groups. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:584-9.
  9. Rai B, KaurJ, Dhattarwal S, Rathee S, Anand S. Changing maxillary and mandibular inter-canine and inter-molar distance between 8 to 20 years: Male and female. Internet J Forensic Sci 2008;3:1-3.
  10. Aluko IA, Dacosta OO, Isiekwe MC. Dental arch width in the early and late permanent dentition of a Nigerian population. Niger Dent J 2009;17:7-11.
  11. Kaushal S, Patnaik VV, Sood V, Agnihotri G. Sex determination in North Indians using mandibular canine index. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2004;26:45‑9.
  12. Kaushal S, Patnaik VV, Agnihotri G. Mandibular canines in sex determination. J Anat Soc India 2003;52:119-24.
  13. Dhara P, Ankur Z, Srushti R, Patel S, Rathod SP, Patel SV. Study of mandibular canine teeth dimorphism in establishing sex identity in Gujarat region. Natl J Integr Res Med 2011;2:6-9.
  14. AcharyaAB, Mainali S. Limitations of the mandibular canine index in sex assessment. J Forensic Leg Med 2009;16:67‑9