Use of frontal sinus and nasal septum patterns as an aid in personal identification: A digital radiographic pilot study

Authors

  • Maria David Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M R Ambedkar Dental College, Cooke Town, Bangalore, Karnataka
  • Runjhun Saxena Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M R Ambedkar Dental College, Cooke Town, Bangalore, Karnataka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.81286

Keywords:

Forensic dentistry, frontal sinus, nasal septum, personal identification, posteroanterior cephalogram

Abstract

Objectives: To examine and classify the variations in the pattern of frontal sinus and nasal septum as observed on the posterior anterior Cephalometric radiographs, and to propose the possible use of the same in personal identification. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 50 individuals visiting the department, whose age ranged from 25 to 50 years. The radiographs of 25 males and 25 females were recorded using a Kodak 8000 C and Dental Imaging Software Viewer 6.3.4. Frontal sinus (symmetry and lobulations) and nasal septum patterns (deviations) were observed and classified. Results: Frontal sinus symmetry was observed in 29 (58%) individuals and asymmetry was observed in 16 (32%). Frontal sinuses were absent (bilateral aplasia) in two individuals (4%). Unilateral aplasia was seen in three individuals (6%). Straight nasal septum was seen in 11 (22%), right deviation in 21 (42%), and left deviation in 15 (30%) individuals. Sigmoid was seen in one male (2%), reverse sigmoid in one male (2%), and other pattern type in one female (2%). Both frontal sinus and nasal septum patterns were assessed together for each individual. Out of 50 individuals, 41 unique combinations of frontal sinus and nasal septum were found. However, there were nine individuals whose patterns matched one of the patterns of the 41 individuals. Conclusion: We observed that the frontal sinus and nasal septum patterns had considerable individual variation. A combined use of both the patterns, as observed on the radiographs, could serve as an adjunct to other methods of personal identification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Rothwell BR. Principles of dental identification. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:253-70.

Tang JP, Hu DY, Jiang FH, Yu XJ. Assessing forensic applications of the frontal sinus in a Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int 2009;183:104.e1-3

Wood RE. Forensic aspects of maxillofacial radiology: Review. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159s:s47-55.

Silva RF, Pinto RN, Ferreira GM, Daruge Júnior E. Importance of frontal sinus radiographs for human identification. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2008;74:798.

Schuller A. A note on the identification of skull x-ray pictures of the frontal sinus. Med J Aust 1943;25:554-6.

Brown WA, Molleson TI, Chinn S. Enlargement of the frontal sinus. Ann Hum Biol 1984;11:221-6.

Quatrehomme G, Fronty P, Sapanet M, Grévin G, Bailet P, Ollier A. Identification by frontal sinus pattern in forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Int 1996;83:147-53.

Asherson N. Identification by frontal sinus prints. A forensic medical pilot survey. London: Lewis and Co.; 1965.

Yoshino M, Miyasaka S, Sato H, Seta S. Classification system of frontal sinus patterns by radiography. Its application to identification of unknown skeletal remains. Forensic Sci Int 1987;34:289-99.

Prossinger H. Sexually dimorphic ontogenetic trajectories of frontal sinus cross sections. Coll Antropol 2001;25:1-11.

Taniguchi M, Sakoda S, Kano T, Zhu BL, Kamikodai Y, Fujita MQ, et al. Possible use of nasal septum and frontal sinus patterns to radiographic identification of unknown human remains. Osaka City Med J 2003;49:31-8.

Ruf S, Pancherz H. Can frontal sinus development be used for the prediction of skeletal maturity at puberty? Acta Odontol Scand 1996;54:229-34.

Howie TO. Identical deformities in the nasal septum of a pair of identical twins. Br Med J 1946. p. 760-1.

Grymer LF, Pallisgaard C, Melsen B. The nasal septum in relation to the development of the nasomaxillary complex: A study in identical twins. Laryngoscope 1991;101:863-8.

Grymer LF, Melsen B. The morphology of the nasal septum in identical twins. Laryngoscope 1989;99:642-6.

Pondé JM, Andrade RN, Via JM, Metzger P, Teles AC. Anatomical variations of the frontal sinus. Int J Morphol 2008;26:803-8.

Porbonikova S. An x-ray investigation of the development of the frontal sinus in children. Folia Med (Plovdiv) 1974;16:213-20.

Gulisano M, Pacini P, Orlandini GE. Frontal sinus dimensions in relation to the cranial index: Anatomoradilogic findings. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper 1978;54:66-9.

Blaney SP. Scaling properties of the frontal sinus in the African great apes: A clue to the role of the human paranasal sinuses. Ver Laryngol Otol Rhinol 2000;121:99-102.

Phrabhakaran N, Naidu M, Subramanian K. Anatomical variability of the frontal sinus and their application in Forensic identification. Clin Anat 1999;12:16-9.

Ponde JM, Metzger P, Amaral G, Machado M, Prandini M. Anatomic variations of the frontal sinus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003;46:29-32.

Szilvassy J. Development of the frontal sinuses. Anthropol Anz 1981;39:138-49.

Krogman WM. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. Thomas, Springfield, 1962.

Aydinlioğlu A, Kavakli A, Erdem S. Absence of frontal sinus in Turkish individuals. Yonsei Med J 2003;44:215-8.

Talaiepour AR, Sazgar AA, Bagheri A. Anatomic variations of the paranasal sinuses on CT scan images. J Dent 2005;2:142-6.

Downloads

Published

2010-12-01

How to Cite

Maria David, & Runjhun Saxena. (2010). Use of frontal sinus and nasal septum patterns as an aid in personal identification: A digital radiographic pilot study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 2(2), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.81286