Experimental studies of forensic odontology to aid in the identification process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.81285Keywords:
Age estimation, cheiloscopy, experimental studies, forensic odontology, molecular methods, rugoscopy, sex determination, tooth printsAbstract
The importance of dental identification is on the increase year after year. With the passage of time, the role of forensic odontology has increased as very often teeth and dental restorations are the only means of identification. Forensic odontology has played a key role in identification of persons in mass disasters (aviation, earthquakes, Tsunamis), in crime investigations, in ethnic studies, and in identification of decomposed and disfigured bodies like that of drowned persons, fire victims, and victims of motor vehicle accidents. The various methods employed in forensic odontology include tooth prints, radiographs, photographic study, rugoscopy, cheiloscopy and molecular methods. Investigative methods applied in forensic odontology are reasonably reliable, yet the shortcomings must be accounted for to make it a more meaningful and relevant procedure. This paper gives an overview of the various experimental studies to aid in the identification processes, discussing their feasibilities and limitations in day-to-day practice.Downloads
Metrics
References
Stimson PG, Mertz CA. Forensic dentistry. New York: CRC Press; 1997. p. 1-45.
Acharya AB, Sivapathasundharam B. Forensic Odontology. In: Rajendran R, Sivapathasundharam B. Editors. Shafer’s Textbook of Oral Pathology. 5th ed. Elsevier: New Delhi; 2006. p. 1199-227.
Vij K. Textbook of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology. Churchill Livingstone, 2nd ed. 2002. p. 71-2.
Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, Parish T. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian Aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J 1997;4: 129-33.
Vahanwala SP, Parekh BK. Study of lip prints as an aid to forensic methodology. J Forensic Med Toxicol 2000;17:12-8.
Manjunath K, Sriram G, Saraswathi TR, Sivapathasundharam B. Enamel rod end patterns: A preliminary study using acetate peel technique and automated biometrics. J Forensic Odontol 2008;1:33-6.
Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation technique. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2001;19:9-17.
Kavitha R. Molecular techniques in forensic dentistry. J Forensic Odontoly 2008;1:13-7.
da Silva RHA, Sales-Peres A, de Oliveira RN, de Oliveira FT, Sales Peres SH. Use of DNA technology in forensic dentistry. J Appl Oral Sci 2007;15:156-61.
Pretty IA, Sweet D. A look at Forensic Dentistry- Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity. Br Dent J 2001;90:359-66.
Ranganathan K, Rooban T, Lakshminarayanan V. Forenesic odontology: A review. J Forensic Odontol 2008;1:4-12.
Kaushal S, Patnaik VVG, Agnihotri G. Mandibular canines in sex determination. J Anat Soc India 2003;52:119-24.
Boaz K, Gupta C. Dimorphism in human maxillary and mandibular canines in establishment of gender. J Forensic Odontol 2009;1:42-4.
Reddy VM, Saxena S, Bansal P. Mandibular canine index as a sex determinant: A study on the population of western Uttar Pradesh. JOMFP 2008;12:56-9.
Stein TJ, Corcoran JF. Pararadicular cementum deposition as a criterion for age estimation in human beings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;77:266-70.
Gray’s anatomy. In; Warwick R, Williams PL, editors. 35th ed. WB Sunders Co; 1973. p. 1184-5.
Aggarwal P, Saxena S, Bansal P. Incremental lines in root cementum of human teeth; An approach to their role in age estimation using polarizing microscopy. Indian J Dent Res 2008;19:326-30.
Manjunath K, Saraswathi TR, Sriram G, Sivapathasundharam B, Porchelvam S. Reliability of automated biometrics in the analysis of enamel rod end patterns. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009:1:32-6.
Gustafson G, Malmo OD. Age determination on teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1952;45:45-54.
Bang G, Ramm E. Determination of age in humans from root dentine transparency. Acta Odontol Scand 1970;28:3-35.
Lamendin H, Baccino E, Humbert JF, Tavernier JC, Nossintchouk RM, Zerilli A. A simple technique for age estimation in adult corpses: The two criteria dental method. J Forensic Sci 1992;37: 1373-9.
Acharya AB. A new digital approach for measuring dentin translucency in forensic age estimation. Am J forensic Med Pathol 2010;31:133-7.
Valenzuela A, Martin-de las Heras S, Mandojana JM, De Dios Luna J, Valenzuela M, Villanueva E. Multiple regression models for age estimation by assessment of morphologic dental changes according to teeth source. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2002;23:386-8.
Singaraju S, Sharada P. Age estimation using pulp/tooth area ratio: A digital image analysis. J Forensic Dent Sci.2009;1:37-41.
McGinvey J, Fixott RH. Computer assisted dental identification. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:309-25.
Bosmans N, Ann P, Aly M, Williams G. The application of Kvaal’s dental age calculation technique on panoramic dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 2005;153:208-12.
Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Sotheim T. Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 1995;74: 175-85.
Rothwell BR. Bite marks in forensic dentistry: A review of legal, scientific issues. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:223-32.
Johnson LT, Cadle D. Bite mark evidence. Recognition, preservation, analysis and courtroom presentation. NY State Dent J 1989;55:38-41.
Valerie JR, Souviron RR. Dusting and lifting the bite prints. A new technique, 1984. J Forensic Sci 1984;19:326-30.
Benson BW, Cottone JA, Bomberg TJ, Sperber ND. Bite mark impressions: A review of technique and materials. J Forensic Sci 1988; 33:1238-43.
Dailey JC, Shernoff AF, Gelles JH. An improved technique for bite mark impressions. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:153-5.
Dorion RB. Preservation and fixation of skin for ulterior scientific evaluation and courtroom presentation. J Can Dent Assoc 1984;50:129-30.
Caldas IM, Magalhães T, Afonso A. Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int 2007;165:1-9.
Santos M. Queiloscopy: A supplementary stomatological means of identification. Brazil. International Microform J. Legal Med. 2 (1967) 66.
Tsuchihashi Y. Studies on personal identification by means of lip print. Forensic Sci Int 1974;3:233-48.
Vahanwala S, Nayak CD, Pagare SS. Study of lip-prints as aid for sex determination. Medico - Legal Update. 2005-07-2005-09; Vol. 5, No. 3. Available from: http://www.indmedica.com/journals.php ?journalid=9&issueid=69&articleid=878&action=article.
Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathod V. Cheiloscopy: The study of lip prints in sex identification. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:24-7.
Thomas CJ, van Wyk CW. The palatal rugae in identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1988;6:21-7.
Lysell L. Plicae palatinae transversae and papilla incisive in man: A morphologic and genetic study. Acta Odont Scand 1955;13: 5-137.
Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal rugae pattern: A new classification. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1983;38:153-76.
Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathod V. Comparative reliability of cheiloscopy and palatoscopy in human identification. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20(4):453-7.
Jeffrey AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL. Hypervariable ‘minisatellite’ regions in human DNA. Nature 1985;314:67-73.
Nuzzolese E, Di Vella G. Future project concerning mass disaster management: A forensic odontology prospectus. Int Dent J 2007;57:261-6.
Sivapathasundharam B, Prakash PA, Sivakumar G. Lip prints (cheiloscopy). Indian J Dent Res 2001;10:234-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
CC-BY allows for unrestricted reuse of content, subject only to the requirement that the source work is appropriately attributed.
