Importance of palatal rugae in individual identification

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Shriram Bansode
Meena Kulkarni

Abstract

Background: Rugae are anatomical folds or wrinkles, the irregular fibrous connective tissue located on the anterior third of the palate, behind the incisive papilla. They are also called ′plica palatine.′ These rugae patterns are studied for various purposes, mainly in the fields of anthropology, genetics, orthodontics, prosthodontics, and forensic science. Objective: To determine the stability of the palatal rugae during fixed orthodontic treatment and to verify the accuracy rate of identification by comparing the rugae patterns on preoperative and postoperative orthodontic casts. Materials and Methods: Thirty preoperative and postoperative dental casts were selected. Thirty casts were randomly selected for the present study. The postoperative and the randomly selected casts were trimmed so that all areas except the rugae area of the hard palate were removed. The 30 postoperative casts were mixed with the 30 randomly selected casts. Thirteen examiners were selected as evaluators. They were instructed to match the 30 preoperative dental casts with the 60 dental casts (30 postoperative and 30 randomly selected casts). The case numbers of those that were correctly matched were noted. Results: During fixed orthodontic treatment, dental changes and sometimes bony changes occurred, but no changes occurred in the rugae pattern. The 13 examiners achieved 90% correct matches, which is the median in the present study. We used kappa statistics to assess the agreement between evaluators for matching preoperative with postoperative casts. Conclusion: Palatal rugae patterns are unique to an individual, and can therefore be used for individual identification in forensic odontology.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Shriram Bansode, & Meena Kulkarni. (2009). Importance of palatal rugae in individual identification. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 1(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2948.60378

References

  1. Ines Morais Caldas, Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. J Forensic Sci Int 2007;165:1-9.
  2. English WR, Robison SF, Summitt JB, Oesterle LJ, Brannon RB, Morlang WM. Individuality of human palatal rugae. J Forensic Sci 1988;33:718-26.
  3. Morlang WM. Forensic dentistry. Aviat Space Environ Med 1982;1:27-34.
  4. Sadler TW. Langman’s medical Embriology. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore: 1990. p. 316-20.
  5. Patil MS, Patil SB, Acharya AB. Palatine rugae and their significance in clinical dentistry: a review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1471-8.
  6. Thomas CJ. The prenatal developmental microscopic anatomy of palatal rugae. J Dental Association S Afr 1984;39:527-33.
  7. Sassouni V. Palatoprint and Roentgenographic Cephalometry as new method in Human identification. Journal of Forensic sci 1957;2:428-42.
  8. Nayak P, Acharya AB, Padmini AT, Kaveri H. Difference in the palatal rugae shape in two populations of India. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:977-82.
  9. Almeida MA, Phillips C, Kula K, Tulloch C. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks. Angle Orthodont 1995;65:43-8.
  10. Thomas CJ, van Wyk CW. The palatal rugae in an identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1988;6:21-7.
  11. Allen H. The palatal rugae in man. Dental Cosmos 1889;31:66-80. 12. Pueyo VM, Garrido BR, Sanchez JA. Odontologialegal. Forense, Masson, Barcelona: 1994. p. 277-92.
  12. Campos ML, Rugoscopia palatine. Available from: http//www. pericias-forenses.com.br.
  13. Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, Parish T, Palatal rugae patterns in Australian Aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J 1997;42:129-33.
  14. Limson KS, Julian R. Computerized recording of the palatal rugae pattern and an evaluation, of its application in forensic identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2004;22:1-4.
  15. Ohtani M, Nishida N, Chiba T, Fukuda M, Miyamoto Y, Yoshioka N. Indication and limitation of using palatal rugae for personal identification in edentulous cases. J Forensic Sci Int 2008;176:178-82.