Reliability of automated biometrics in the analysis of enamel rod end patterns

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

K Manjunath
T Saraswathi
G Sriram
B Sivapathasundharam
S Porchelvam

Abstract

Tooth prints are enamel rod end patterns on the tooth surface. These patterns are unique to an individual tooth of same individual and different individuals. The aim of this study was to analyze the reliability and sensitivity of an automated biometrics software (Verifinger ® standard SDK version 5.0) in analyzing tooth prints. In present study, enamel rod end patterns were obtained three times from a specific area on the labial surface of ten extracted teeth using acetate peel technique. The acetate peels were subjected to analysis with Verifinger ® standard SDK version 5.0 software to obtain the enamel rod end patterns (tooth prints) and respective minutiae scores for each tooth print. The minutiae scores obtained for each tooth print was subjected to statistical analysis using Cronbach′s test for reliability. In the present study, it was found that Verifinger ® software was able to identify duplicate records of the same area of a same tooth with the original records stored on the database of the software. Comparison of the minutiae scores using Cronbach′s test also showed that there was no significant difference in the minutiae scores obtained (>0.6). Hence, acetate peel technique with Verifinger ® standard SDK version 5.0 is a reliable technique in analysis of enamel rod end patterns, and as a forensic tool in personal identification. But, further studies are needed to verify the reliability to this technique in a clinical setting, as obtaining an acetate peel record from the same area of the tooth in-vivo, is difficult.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
K Manjunath, T Saraswathi, G Sriram, B Sivapathasundharam, & S Porchelvam. (2009). Reliability of automated biometrics in the analysis of enamel rod end patterns. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 1(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2948.50887

References

  1. Hallinan PW. Recognizing human eyes. Geometr Met Comput Vision 1991;1570:214-26.
  2. Shen W, Tan T. Automated biometrics based personal identifi cation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1999;96:11065-6.
  3. Ramenzoni LL, Line SR. Automated biometrics based personal identifi cation of Hunter Schreger bands of dental enamel. Proc R Soc B 2006;273:1155-8.
  4. Manjunath K. Enamel rod end patt erns: A preliminary study using acetate peel technique and automated biometrics. J Forensic Odontol 2008;1:33-6.
  5. Stefen C. Enamel structure of arctoid carnivora: Amphicyonidae, Ursidae, Procyonidae and Mustelidae. J Mammal 2001;82:450-2.
  6. Holland MM, Cave CA, Holland CA, Bille TW. Development of a quality, high throughput DNA analysis procedure for skeletal samples to assist with the identifi cation of victims from the World Trade Center att acks. Croat Med J 2003;44:264-5.
  7. Berkovitz BK, Holland GR, Moxiham BJ. Oral anatomy, histology and embryology. 3rd ed. Mosby Publication; 2002. p. 110-1.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.