Can dead man tooth do tell tales? Tooth prints in forensic identification

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Vineetha Christopher
Sarvani Murthy
S Ashwinirani
Kulkarni Prasad
Suragimath Girish
Shashikanth Vinit

Abstract

Background: We know that teeth trouble us a lot when we are alive, but they last longer for thousands of years even after we are dead. Teeth being the strongest and resistant structure are the most significant tool in forensic investigations. Patterns of enamel rod end on the tooth surface are known as tooth prints. Aim: This study is aimed to know whether these tooth prints can become a forensic tool in personal identification such as finger prints. A study has been targeted toward the same. Settings and Design: In the present in-vivo study, acetate peel technique has been used to obtain the replica of enamel rod end patterns. Materials and Methods: Tooth prints of upper first premolars were recorded from 80 individuals after acid etching using cellulose acetate strips. Then, digital images of the tooth prints obtained at two different intervals were subjected to biometric conversion using Verifinger standard software development kit version 6.5 software followed by the use of Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) software for comparison of the tooth prints. Similarly, each individual's finger prints were also recorded and were subjected to the same software. Statistical Analysis: Further, recordings of AFIS scores obtained from images were statistically analyzed using Cronbach's test. Results: We observed that comparing two tooth prints taken from an individual at two intervals exhibited similarity in many cases, with wavy pattern tooth print being the predominant type. However, the same prints showed dissimilarity when compared with other individuals. We also found that most of the individuals with whorl pattern finger print showed wavy pattern tooth print and few loop type fingerprints showed linear pattern of tooth prints. Conclusions: Further more experiments on both tooth prints and finger prints are required in establishing an individual's identity.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Vineetha Christopher, Sarvani Murthy, S Ashwinirani, Kulkarni Prasad, Suragimath Girish, & Shashikanth Vinit. (2017). Can dead man tooth do tell tales? Tooth prints in forensic identification. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 9(1), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_24_16

References

  1. Dayal PK, Srinivasan SV, Paravathy RP. Text Book of Forensic Odontology. 1st ed. Hyderabad: Paras Medical Publishers; 1998.
  2. Ashwinirani SR, Suragimath G, Sande RA, Kulkarni P, Nimbal A, Shankar T, et al. Comparison of lip print patterns in two Indian subpopulations and its correlation in ABO blood groups. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:40‑3.
  3. Bijjargi SC, Malligere SB, Sangle AV, Saraswathi FK, Majid IA, Ashwinirani SR. A new attempt in comparison between 3 racial groups in India – Based on lip prints (Cheiloscopy). Int J Appl Dent Sci 2015;1:20‑3.
  4. Stimsom PG, Mertz CA. Forensic Dentistry. Boca Raton: CRC Press Publication; 1997. p. 185-216.
  5. Suragimath G, Ashwinirani SR, Christopher V, Bijjargi S, Pawar R, NayakA. Gender determination by radiographic analysis of mental foramen in Maharashtra population of India. J Forensic Dent Sci 2016 ;8:176.
  6. Manjunath K, Sriram G, Saraswathi TR, Sivapathasundaram B. Enamel rod end patterns: A preliminary study using acetate peel technique and automated biometrics. J Forensic Odontol 2008;1:33‑6.
  7. Manjunath K, Saraswathi TR, Sriram G, Sivapathasundharam B, Porchelvam S. Reliability of automated biometrics in the analysis of enamel rod end patterns. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:32‑6.
  8. Manjunath K, Sivapathasundharam B, Saraswathi TR. Analysis of enamel rod end patterns on tooth surface for personal identification – Ameloglyphics. J Forensic Sci 2012;57:789‑93.
  9. Gupta N, Jadhav K, Ahmed Mujib BR, Amberkar VS. Is re‑creation of human identity possible using tooth prints? An experimental study to aid in identification. Forensic Sci Int 2009;192:67‑71.
  10. Girish H, Murgod S, Ravath CM, Hegde RB. Ameloglyphics and predilection of dental caries. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2013;17:181‑4.