A comparative evaluation between cheiloscopic patterns and canine relationship in primary dentition


  • R. Vignesh Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha University, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
  • David Ditto Sharmin Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu




Canine relationships, cheiloscopy, primary dentition


Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between different cheiloscopic patterns with the canine relationship in deciduous dentition. Materials and Methods: Three-hundred children who were 3–6 years old with complete primary dentition were recruited and the relationships between maxillary and mandibular canines were recorded in the pro forma. Lip prints of the patients were recorded with the lipstick-cellophane method, and middle 10 mm of the lower lip was analyzed for the lip print pattern. The patterns were classified based on the Tsuchihashi and Suzuki classification. Results: Type II (branched) pattern was the most predominant cheiloscopic pattern. The predominant patterns which related to the terminal planes were Type IV (reticular) pattern for Class I, Type IV (reticular) and I (complete vertical) patterns for Class II, and the presence of Type V (irregular) pattern for Class III. Presence of Type I (complete vertical) and II (branched) patterns in males and Type II (branched) pattern alone in females can suggest for a Class II canine relationship. Conclusion: Lip prints can provide an alternative to dermatoglyphics to predict the canine relationship in primary dentition. Further studies with larger sample size are required to provide an insight into its significant correlations.


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...


Yilmaz Y, Gürbüz T, Simşek S, Dalmiş A. Primary canine and molar relationships in centric occlusion in 3–6‑year‑old Turkish children: A cross‑sectional study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7:59‑66.

Luzzi V, Fabbrizi M, Coloni C, Mastrantoni C, Mirra C, Bossù M, et al. Experience of dental caries and its effects on early dental occlusion: A descriptive study. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2011;2:13‑8.

Sivapathasundharam B, Prakash PA, Sivakumar G. Lip prints (cheiloscopy). Indian J Dent Res 2001;12:234‑7.

Verghese AJ, Vidyullatha VS, Shashidhar CM. A comparison of the methods for the recording of lip prints. Med Leg Update Int J 2010;10:62-3.

Amith HV. Lip prints – Can it aid in individual identification. J Oral Health Community Dent 2011;5:113‑8.

Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. A new attempt of personal identification by means of lip print. J Indian Dent Assoc. 1970; 42:8‑9.

Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathod V. Comparative reliability of cheiloscopy and palatoscopy in human identification. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:453‑7.

Raghav P, Kumar N, Shingh S, Ahuja NK, Ghalaut P. Lip prints: The barcode of skeletal malocclusion. J Forensic Dent Sci 2013;5:110‑7.

Madhusudan K, Patel HP, Umesh K, Chavan S, Patel R, Patel R, et al. Relationship between dermatoglyphics, cheiloscopy and dental caries among dental students of Visnagar town, Gujarat. Int J Adv Res 2015;3:952‑9.




How to Cite

R. Vignesh, & David Ditto Sharmin. (2018). A comparative evaluation between cheiloscopic patterns and canine relationship in primary dentition. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 10(2), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_21_17