Root Length: As a determinant tool of sexual dimorphism in an ethnic Tamil population


N. Priyadharsini
Divyalakshmi Govindaram
R. Bharanidharan
R. Ramya
A. Rameshkumar
K. Rajkumar


Background: Sexual dimorphism in teeth has been an area of research for forensic anthropologists. The function of root in transmitting the forces of occlusion to the alveolar bone varies as the force in males tends to be larger than in females. This shows the significance of the root length as indicators of sexual dimorphism. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the presence of sexual dimorphism in the root lengths of permanent teeth and to evaluate if root length could be instrumental in defining sexual dimorphism among an ethnic Tamil population. Materials and Methods: Orthopantomograms of 1000 individuals (500 males and 500 females) were utilized, and the measurement of root length of permanent maxillary and mandibular teeth from canine to first molar on all four quadrants using the Digital software SCANORA 5.2.6. was carried out. Statistical analysis including descriptive statistics and independent Student t-test were performed. Results: In this study, the sexual dimorphism in root length is observed in 13, 14, 15, 16, 23, 26, 33, 36, 43, and 46 (mesial), and there is a statistically significant difference between the root measurements of males and females (P < 0.05). Most dimorphic teeth were maxillary canines and mandibular canines. Conclusion: The data generated from this study suggest that the root length measurements present with a substantial evidence of sexual dimorphism emphasizing its importance on identifying sex and are therefore useful in determining the biological profile.


How to Cite
N. Priyadharsini, Divyalakshmi Govindaram, R. Bharanidharan, R. Ramya, A. Rameshkumar, & K. Rajkumar. (2018). Root Length: As a determinant tool of sexual dimorphism in an ethnic Tamil population. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 10(2), 96–100.


  1. Acharya AB, Mainali S. Univariate sex dimorphism in the Nepalese dentition and the use of discriminant functions in gender assessment. Forensic Sci Int 2007;173:47‑56.
  2. Khamis MF, Taylor JA, Malik SN, Townsend GC. Odontometric sex variation in Malaysians with application to sex prediction. Forensic Sci Int 2014;234:183.e1‑7.
  3. Angadi PV, Hemani S, Prabhu S, Acharya AB. Analyses of Odontometric sexual dimorphism and sex assessment accuracy on a large sample. J Forensic Leg Med 2013;20:673‑7.
  4. Harris EF, Couch WM. The relative sexual dimorphism of human incisor crown and root dimensions. Dent Anthropol 2006;19:87‑94.
  5. Capitaneanu C, Willems G, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Thevissen P. Sex estimation based on tooth measurements using panoramic radiographs. Int J Legal Med 2017;131:813‑21.
  6. Dhall JK, Kapoor AK. Fingerprint ridge density as a potential forensic anthropological tool for sex identification. J Forensic Sci 2016;61:424‑9.
  7. Álvarez‑Sandoval BA, Manzanilla LR, Montiel R. Sex determination in highly fragmented human DNA by high‑resolution melting (HRM) analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e104629.
  8. Prabhu S, Acharya AB. Odontometric sex assessment in Indians. Forensic Sci Int 2009;192:129.e1‑5.
  9. Zorba E, Moraitis K, Eliopoulos C, Spiliopoulou C. Sex determination in modern Greeks using diagonal measurements of molar teeth. Forensic Sci Int 2012;217:19‑26.
  10. Garn SM, Lewis AB, Swindler DR, Kerewsky RS. Genetic control of sexual dimorphism in tooth size. J Dent Res 1967;46:963‑72.
  11. Brook AH, Griffin RC, Townsend G, Levisianos Y, Russell J, Smith RN, et al. Variability and patterning in permanent tooth size of four human ethnic groups. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54 Suppl 1:S79‑85.
  12. Ateş M, Karaman F, Işcan MY, Erdem TL. Sexual differences in Turkish dentition. Leg Med (Tokyo) 2006;8:288‑92.