Evaluation of occlusal groove morphology of primary mandibular second molar in an Indian population


E. M. G. Subramanian
Ganesh Jeevanandan
A. Ahsana


Background: The study of morphology of dentition can provide information on the phylogenetic relationship between species and diversities among population. There is a difference in opinions regarding influence of ethnicity on dental morphology. Using quantitative methods, few studies have shown the associations between these dental features and crown traits in humans. The present study is to find the correlation between the occlusal morphology and forensic anthropological research. Aim and Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of different types of primary mandibular second molars in South Indian which can be used in forensic anthropological research. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted among 276 children in Thiruvallur district, Tamil Nadu. Screening for the number of cusps and groove patterns of primary mandibular second molars was done by direct intraoral examination. Statistical Analysis: It was done with the help of IBM. SPSS statistics software 23.0 version. To find the significance in categorical data, Chi-square test was used. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Primary mandibular second molars with 5 cusps were observed in 96.4% of population, 4 cusps in 1.8%, and 6 cusps in 1.8% which were noted in the study. Mandibular second molars with “+” groove pattern in 33% of population and “Y” groove pattern in 67% of population were recorded. 5Y pattern was the most frequently observed occlusal pattern in these population, which is a primitive type of occlusal groove pattern. Conclusion: The study of dental morphology and odontometry is important in the field of forensic and anthropological research. It helps to understand the phylogenetic relationships among species and also to study the diversities within a population. This study revealed a primitive type of occlusal morphology in the population studied.


How to Cite
E. M. G. Subramanian, Ganesh Jeevanandan, & A. Ahsana. (2018). Evaluation of occlusal groove morphology of primary mandibular second molar in an Indian population. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 10(2), 92–95. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_38_18


  1. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dursek JE, Fergusson MW. The Teeth. Gray’s Anatomy. 39th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2008.
  2. Kieser JA, van der Merwe CA. Classificatory reliability of the carabelli trait in man. Arch Oral Biol 1984;29:795‑801.
  3. Loh HS. Mongoloid features of the permanent mandibular second molar in Singaporean Chinese. Aust Dent J 1991;36:442‑4.
  4. Santos Neto ET, Oliveira AE, Barbosa RW, Zandonade E, Oliveira ZF. The influence of sucking habits on occlusion development in the first 36 months. Dental Press J Orthod 2012;17:96‑104.
  5. Nagle RJ, Seasrs VH. Anterior Tooth Arrangement. In: Complete Dentures. 1st ed. St. Louis: The CV Mosby Company; 1958. p. 353.
  6. Gregory WK, Hellman M. The crown patterns of fossils and recent human molar teeth and their meaning. Nat Hist 1926;26:300‑9.
  7. Ash MM, Nelson SJ. Wheelers Dental Anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion. St. Louis: Saunders; 2003.
  8. Greene DL. Genetics, dentition, and taxomony. Univ Wyo Pub 1967;33:93‑168.
  9. Inda G, Vazdar M, Vodanovic M. Human molar crown traits in Croatian medieval and contemporary populations. Int J Oral Sci Dent Med 2010;44:3‑16.
  10. Phulari RG, Rathore R, Takvani MD, Jain S. Evaluation of occlusal groove patterns of mandibular first and second molars in an Indian population: A forensic anthropological study. Indian J Dent Res 2017;28:252‑5.
  11. Ash MM, Nelson SJ. Wheeler’s Dental Anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion. 9th ed. St. Louis: Saunders; 2003. p. 323.
  12. Macesic M, Kaic Z. Characteristics of the occlusal surfaces of lower molars in a sample of the Croatian population. Acta Stomatol Croat 2003;3:69‐73.
  13. Dahlberg AA. Dental traits as identification tool. Dent Prog 1963;3:155‑160.
  14. Brook AH. Multilevel complex interactions between genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in the aetiology of anomalies of dental development. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54 Suppl 1:S3‑17.
  15. Jordan RE, Abrams L, Kraus BS. Kraus’s Dental Anatomy and Occlusion. St. Louis: Mosby‑ year book Inc; 1992.
  16. Mosharraf R, Hajian F. Occlusal morphology of the mandibular first and second premolars in Iranian adolescents. Inter J Dent Anthropol 2004;5:10-14.
  17. Huang ST, Miura F, Soma K. A dental anthropological study of Chinese in Taiwan (3). Dental trait. Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi 1992;8:665-78.
  18. Maćesić M, Kaić Z, Dumancić J, Poje Z, Dumić M. Occlusal molar surfaces in females with turner’s syndrome. Coll Antropol 2003;27:761-8.
  19. Loh HS. Coronal morphology of the mandibular second premolar in the Singaporean Chinese. Aust Dent J 1993;38:283-6.
  20. Dahlberg AA. The changing dentition of man. J Am Dent Assoc 1945;32:676-90.
  21. Turner CG 2nd. Advances in the dental search for Native American origins. Acta Anthropogenet 1984;8:23-78.
  22. Turner CG 2nd. Three-rooted mandibular fi rst permanent molars and the question of American Indian origins. Am J Phys Anthropol 1971;34:229-41.
  23. Tratrnan EK. Three-rooted lower molars in man, and their racial distribution. Br Dent J 1938;64:264-7.
  24. Guo L, Ren L, Sun DL, Shen J. Morphological study on occlusal grove of mandibular molar of Chinese adults Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 1997;6:129-31.
  25. Hasund A, Bang G. Morphologic characteristics of the Alaskan Eskimo dentition: IV. Cusp number and groove patterns of mandibular molars. Am J Phys Anthropol 1985;67:65-9.