Salivary signature in forensic profiling: A scoping review


Priyanka Kapoor
Aman Chowdhry


Background: Saliva has recently served as a primary investigative tool in forensics in the detection of crime, cases of sexual assaults, human and animal bite marks, poisoning, hormone identification, and alcohol and drug abuse. Aim: This scoping review aimed to comprehensively identify the role of saliva in comparative and reconstructive identification and propose the concept of salivary signature (SS) in forensics. Methodology: A literature search was performed on electronic databases, PubMed and Google Scholar with keywords, “salivary,” “microbiome,” and “forensics,” and relevant articles identified along with reference tracking. Results: SS model was based on salivary microbiome and biomarkers which together provide pertinent information about lifestyle, behavioral patterns, circadian rhythms, geolocation, cohabitation of individuals, postmortem intervals, systemic and oral ailments or cancers besides salivary flow and composition. Conclusions: This communication highlights the constituents of SS and their significance in forensics. It also enumerates factors altering SS, limitations owing to diversity in microbiome and biomarker status, and possible measures to improve its accuracy and robustness in forensics.


How to Cite
Priyanka Kapoor, & Aman Chowdhry. (2018). Salivary signature in forensic profiling: A scoping review. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 10(3), 123–127.


  1. Clarke TH, Gomez A, Singh H, Nelson KE, Brinkac LM. Integrating the microbiome as a resource in the forensics toolkit. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2017;30:141‑7.
  2. Leake SL, Pagni M, Falquet L, Taroni F, Greub G. The salivary microbiome for differentiating individuals: Proof of principle. Microbes Infect 2016;18:399‑405.
  3. Leake SL. Is human DNA enough? – Potential for bacterial DNA. Front Genet 2013;4:282.
  4. Rajshekar M, Tennant M, Thejaswini B. Salivary biomarkers and their applicability in forensic identification. Sri Lanka J Forensic Med Sci Law 2013;4:10‑5.
  5. Fuentes AM, Sanchez CN. Biomarkers in saliva as a tool for health diagnosis. New Trends in Biomarkers and Diseases Research: An Overview. 1st ed. UAE: Bentham Science Publishers; 2017. p. 436‑68.
  6. Takayasu L, Suda W, Takanashi K, Iioka E, Kurokawa R, Shindo C, et al. Circadian oscillations of microbial and functional composition in the human salivary microbiome. DNA Res 2017;24:261‑70.
  7. Song SJ, Lauber C, Costello EK, Lozupone CA, Humphrey G, Berg‑Lyons D, et al. Cohabiting family members share microbiota with one another and with their dogs. Elife 2013;2:e00458.
  8. Alan G, Sarah JP. Microbes as forensic indicators. Trop Biomed 2012;29:311‑30.
  9. Lamont RJ, Jenkinson HF. Oral Microbiology at a Glance. Oxford, UK: Wiley‑Blackwell; 2010.
  10. Parahitiyawa NB, Scully C, Leung WK, Yam WC, Jin LJ, Samaranayake LP. Exploring the oral bacterial flora: Current status and future directions. Oral Dis 2010;16:136‑45.
  11. Kennedy DM, Stanton JA, García JA, Mason C, Rand CJ, Kieser JA, et al. Microbial analysis of bite marks by sequence comparison of streptococcal DNA. PLoS One 2012;7:e51757.
  12. Brown KA, Elliot TR, Rogers AH, Thonard JC. The survival of oral streptococci on human skin and its implication in bite‑mark investigation. Forensic Sci Int 1984;26:193‑7.
  13. Li J, Quinque D, Horz HP, Li M, Rzhetskaya M, Raff JA, et al. Comparative analysis of the human saliva microbiome from different climate zones: Alaska, Germany, and Africa. BMC Microbiol 2014;14:316.
  14. Nasidze I, Li J, Quinque D, Tang K, Stoneking M. Global diversity in the human salivary microbiome. Genome Res 2009;19:636‑43.
  15. Damann FE, Williams DE, Layton AC. Potential use of bacterial community succession in decaying human bone for estimating postmortem interval. J Forensic Sci 2015;60:844‑50.
  16. Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 2009;326:1694‑7.