Comparative Evaluation of the Relationship between the Root-Tips of Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Floor of Maxillary Sinus using Digital Orthopantomogram in Chhattisgarh Individuals with Different Cephalic Indices

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published May 30, 2023
https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/2/2021.38
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 13, Issue 2, May - August 2021

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Kanak Tripathi
Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Nanded Rural Dental College and Research Center, Pangri - 431606, Maharashtra
Abhijeet Deoghare
Professor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Chhattisgarh Dental College and Research Institute, Rajnandgaon - 491441, Chhattisgarh
Chinar Fating
Reader, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Chhattisgarh Dental College and Research Institute, Rajnandgaon - 491441, Chhattisgarh
Anukriti Roshan Dhonge
Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Nanded Rural Dental College and Research Center, Pangri - 431606, Maharashtra

Abstract

Background and Aims: Cephalic index has significant importance in the field of forensic science and variation in the cephalic index affects the facial dimensions and growth of the maxillary sinus in an individual. Knowledge of the anatomical relationship between maxillary posterior teeth and the floor of the maxillary sinus is very important for preoperative treatment planning in dentistry. The aim of the study is a comparative evaluation of the relationship and the distances between maxillary posterior teeth root tips and the floor of the maxillary sinus in different cephalic index subjects using a digital orthopantomogram. Materials and Methods: 210 subjects were categorized as Brachycephalic, Mesocephalic and Dolichocephalic according to their cephalic index. Orthopantomograms of these subjects were taken for assessment of vertical relationships between the maxillary posterior teeth and the floor of the maxillary sinus followed by distance measurement. Recorded data were statistically analyzed. Results: Significant difference in vertical distance was observed in all three cephalic groups in the case of 1st premolars, distobuccal roots of 1st molars and mesiobuccal roots of 2nd molars. Conclusion: The study concluded variation in the cephalic index affects the relationship and vertical distance between the maxillary sinus floor and the roots of maxillary posterior teeth.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Tripathi, K. ., Deoghare, A. ., Fating, C. ., & Dhonge, A. R. . (2023). Comparative Evaluation of the Relationship between the Root-Tips of Maxillary Posterior Teeth and Floor of Maxillary Sinus using Digital Orthopantomogram in Chhattisgarh Individuals with Different Cephalic Indices. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 13(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/2/2021.38
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Danford MH. The maxillary sinus and its dental implications. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994; 32(3):199-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(94)90125-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-4356(94)90125-2
  2. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. 2nd ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier; 1999. https://doi. org/10.1097/00008505-199901000-00013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199901000-00013
  3. Chanavaz M. Maxillary sinus: Anatomy, physiology, surgery and bone grafting related to implantology. J Oral Implantol. 1990; 16(3):199-209.
  4. Arx TV, Fodich I, Bornstein MM. Proximity of premolar roots to maxillary sinus: A radiographic survey using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2014; 40(10):1541-1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.022 PMid:25129024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.022
  5. Dragan E, Rusa O, Nemtoi A, Melian G, Mihai C, Haba D. Maxillary sinus anatomic and pathologic CT findings in edentulous patients scheduled for sinus augmentation. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2014; 118(4):1114-1121.
  6. Shukla D, Bablani D, Chowdhry A, Thapar R, Gupta P, Mishra S. Dentofacial and cranial changes in down syndrome. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2014; 5(6):339-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrp.2014.09.004 PMid:25562042 PMCid:PMC4281609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrp.2014.09.004
  7. Arabion H, Haghnegahdar AA, Ardekani YS, Ebrahimi R, Tabrizi R. Comparison of the distances between the maxillary sinus floor and root-tips of the first and second maxillary molar teeth using panoramic radiography among dolichocephalic and brachycephalic and mesocephalic individuals. J Dent Mater Tech. 2015; 4(2):81-88.
  8. Khair S, Bhandari D, Wavhal S. Study of cephalic index among the students of Mumbai region. Indian App Res. 2013; 3(11):64-66. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555X/NOV2013/74 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555X/NOV2013/74
  9. Collett AR, West VC. Terminology of facial morphology in the vertical dimension. Aust Dent J. 1993; 38(6):480- 481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1993.tb0476.x PMid:8110084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1993.tb04767.x
  10. Rakosi T, Jonas I, Graber TM. Orthodontic diagnosis (Color Atlas of Dental Medicine). 1st ed. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers; 1993.
  11. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR, Alt KW, Bagic I, Baltadjiev G. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg. 2005; 16(4):615-646. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000171847.58031.9e PMid:16077306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000171847.58031.9e
  12. Wehrbein H, Diedrich P. Progressive pneumatization of the basal maxillary sinus after extraction and space closure. Fortschr Kieferorthop. 1992; 53(2):77-83. https://doi. org/10.1007/BF02164641 PMid:1577348
  13. Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM. Gray’s anatomy. 38th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1995.
  14. Park JH, Tai K, Kanao A, Takagi M. Space closure in the maxillary posterior area through the maxillary sinus. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014; 145(1):95-102. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.020 PMid:24373659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.020
  15. Gowrisankar C, Thanmayi P, Suprabath P, Balla H. Correlation of maxillary sinus to the roots of maxillary posterior teeth and a review of literature. Int J Sci Res. 2017; 6(1):506-515. https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20164130 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21275/ART20164130
  16. Mattar E, Hammad L, Faden A, Khalil H. Relation of maxillary teeth to the maxillary sinus in normal Saudi individuals living in Riyadh. Biosci Biotech Res Asia. 2010; 7(2):695-700.
  17. Pertiwi AD, Firman RN, Pramanik F. Analysis digital panoramic radiograph about positions root of maxillary posterior teeth with maxillary sinus floor. Padjadjaran J Dent. 2016; 28(3):148-153. https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol28no3.13669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24198/pjd.vol28no3.13669
  18. Kwak HH, Park HD, Yoon HR, Kang MK, Koh KS, Kim HJ. Topographic anatomy of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 33(4):382-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.012 PMid:15145042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.012