The Prevalence of a Forensic Index the Tubercule of Carabelli for a Moroccan Population

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abdallah Mouhibi
Amine Chafii
Ali Sayah
Abderrahman

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence, degree of expression and symmetry of the tubercle of Carabelli in a sample of Dentistry students to highlight this sensitive area to dental caries. Materials and Methods: We conducted a descriptive transversal survey of students in the 4th year of the academic year 2015/2016 at the Faculty of Dental Medicine of Casablanca. The study is made on plaster models for students, by measuring the mesiodistal diameter of the TC with an electronic calliper. Results: Several results were obtained: 64.29% of the study population have CT, while it is absent in 35.71% of cases, 37.50% with a tubercle of Carabelli little developed, 26.71% with a well-developed Carabelli tubercle, 61.11% of cases exhibit TC bilaterally and 38.89% of cases present the TC unilaterally. The results are consistent with those obtained in other surveys conducted in other countries and discordance with others. Conclusion: The lack of standardization of the study’s methodology makes it difficult to compare the results of various studies, hence the need for similar studies on larger samples. It has some importance in the dental, forensic, and anthropological fields. In orthodontics, the cause of premature caries and periodontal diseases, also in extractions, the molar extraction instruments have no housing for this cusp and can therefore lead to fracture.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Mouhibi, A., Chafii, A., Sayah, A., & Abderrahman. (2023). The Prevalence of a Forensic Index the Tubercule of Carabelli for a Moroccan Population. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 13(2), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/2/2021.41

References

  1. Correia A, Pina C. Tubercule of carabelli: A review. Dental anthropol. 2002; 15:2-3. https://doi.org/10.26575/daj.v15i2-3.171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26575/daj.v15i2-3.171
  2. Nuwadatta S, Sanjay S, Chataut T, Paudel S, Pradhan A. The prevalence of the carabelli trait in selected Nepalese population. Int J morphol Junary. 2015; 7:285-291. https:// doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2015/14450 PMid:26411576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2015/14450
  3. Bermudez De Castro Jm. The carabelli trait in human prehistoric populations of the Canary islands. Hum Biol. 1989; 61:117-31.
  4. Iwai-Liao Y. A comparative morphologic study of carabelli cusp between Chinese and Japanese students. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology. 1995 Jul; 2:66-7.
  5. Ferreira Ma. Presence and morphology of the molar tubercle according to dentition hemi-arch and sex. J Int Morph. 2010; 28:121-125. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022010000100017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022010000100017
  6. Diamond M, Macmillan Cg. J Dent Anthropol New York. 1952; 3.
  7. Al Shethri S. The prevalence of the carabelli cusp in selected Saudi population. Hydrometallurgy. 2011 Jul; 1:13-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ksujds.2011.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ksujds.2011.03.003
  8. Scott G, Turner G. The anthropology of modern human teeth. Cambridge University Press; 1997. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316529843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316529843
  9. Kieser Ja. An analysis of the carabelli trait in the mixed deciduous and permanent human dentition. Oral Biol. 1984; 6:403-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(84)90019-0 PMid:6589981 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(84)90019-0
  10. Batujeff W. Carabelli’s hockerchen und andere unbestandige hocker der oberen mahl-zahne beim menschen und affen. Isr Imp Akad Nauk. 1996; 5:93-109.
  11. Iwai-Liao Y, Guo L, Higashi Y, Sun D, Tsubai T, Kim Jg, Takeuchi Ma. Preliminary study on inherited tooth morphology characters of Japanese and Chinese young adults-with special reference to the Carabelli tubercle. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn. 1996; 73:1-5. https://doi.org/10.2535/ofaj1936.73.1_1 PMid:8741381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2535/ofaj1936.73.1_1
  12. Townsend C, Brow T. The Carabelli trait in Australian aboriginal dentition. Arch Oral Biol. 1981; 26:809-814. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(81)90177-1 PMid:6949523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(81)90177-1
  13. Dalberg As. Analysis of American Indian dentition. J Dent Anthropol Pergamon Press. 1963; 149-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-009823-4.50013-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-009823-4.50013-6
  14. Harris Ef. Carabelli’s trait and tooth size of human maxillary first molars. J Phys Antropol. 2007; 132:238-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20503 PMid:17078037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20503
  15. John P, Theresia C, Ryan D, Tracy K. Model of tooth morphogenesis predicts carabelli cusp expression, size and symmetry in humans. J Dental Athropol. 2010 Jul; 5-7. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011844 PMid:20689576 PMCid:PMC2912281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011844
  16. Khan DB, Khan MA, Khattak M. Prevalence of cusp of carabelli in permanent teeth in a group from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. Pakistan Oral and Dent J. 2011 Dec; 31-2.
  17. Rekhalakshmi K, Sivakuamar N. Expression of carabelli trait in children from southern India- a cross sectional study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2014; 6:51-57. https:// doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.127772 PMid:24696590 PMCid:PMC3970389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.127772
  18. Alvesalo L, Nuutila M, Portin P. The cusps of carabelli. Occurrence in first upper molars and evaluation of its heritability. Acta Odontol Scand. 1975; 33: 191-197. https:// doi.org/10.3109/00016357509027561 PMid:1067720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357509027561
  19. Adatullah S, Odusanya Sa, Mustafa A, Abdul Razak P, Abdul Wahab M, Meer Z. The prevalence of fifth cusp (cusp of carabelli) in the upper molars in Saudi Arabian school students. Int J Morphol. 2012; 30:757-760. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022012000200066 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022012000200066
  20. Falumo O. The cusp of carabelli: Frequency distribution, size and clinical significance in Nigeria; West Afr J Med. 2002 Oct-Dec; 21(4):322-324. https://doi.org/10.4314/wajm.v21i4.28011 PMid:12665277 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/wajm.v21i4.28011
  21. Jernvall J. Linking development with the generation of novelty in mammalian teeth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000; 97:2641-2645, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.050586297 PMid:10706636 PMCid:PMC15982 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.050586297
  22. Virginia M. The tubercle of carabelli in the kish, dentition mesopotamia 3000 B.C. University of British columbia library; 2015 Jun; 25.
  23. Vodanovic M, Zukanovic A, Galic C, Harvey Dl, Savic Pavi J, Dumanci Z, Bedi C, Njemirovskij V, Slaus S, Brkic H. Carabelli’s trait in Croatian populations over 1800 years. HOMO- J Comp Hum Biol. 2013; 64: 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2013.04.001 PMid:23664021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2013.04.001
  24. Kraus BS. Carabelli’s anomaly of the maxillary teeth. Am J Hum Genet. 1951; 3: 348-55
  25. Lee Ct, Groose H. The inheritance of dental traits in a Chinese population in the United Kingdom. J Med Gen. 1972; 9(3): 336-339. https://doi.org/10.1136/ jmg.9.3.336 PMid:5079106 PMCid:PMC1469127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.9.3.336
  26. Salazar-Ciudad I, Jernvall J. A gene network model accounting for development and evolution of mammalian teeth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002; 99: 8116-8120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.132069499 PMid:12048258 PMCid:PMC123030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.132069499
  27. Carbonnell VM. The tubercle of carabelli in the kish dentition mesopontamia. J Dent Res. 1960; 39:124-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345600390010601 PMid:13807631 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345600390010601