Morphometric Analysis of Mandible for Gender determination in adult patients: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published May 30, 2023
https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/2/2021.21
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 13, Issue 2, May - August 2021

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Archana Bhatia
Professor, Department of Periodontics, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar - 335001, Rajasthan
Sandeep Kumar Bains
Professor and Head, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Surendera Dental College and Research Institute, Sriganganagar - 335001, Rajasthan

Abstract

Context: Gender determination is an important component of personal identification. Aims: Assessment of gender using mandible with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). Settings and Design: This cross-sectional prospective study was conducted on dental outpatients in the department of Oral Medicine and Radiology. Methods and Material: 148 dental outpatients were selected and subjected to CBCT. Mandibular landmarks such as gonial angle, alveolar ridge to mental foramen distance, mental foramen to the inferior border of mandible distance, mandibular canal to the most anterior tangent point of buccal and lingual mandibular plate distance, mandibular canal border to the lowest tangent point on the inferior border of the mandible, coronoid height, bigonial breadth, minimal ramus breadth and ramus length were assessed on CBCT scan. Statistical Analysis Used: Data was represented as mean and Standard Deviation (SD). Parameters were compared between males and females using Kruskal-Wallis and Student’s independent T-test. A value below 0.05 represented significant results. Results: All parameters except gonial were significantly higher in males as compared to females angle (P< 0.05). The distance from the lowest point of the mandibular canal to the most posterior tangent point of the Mandibular Lingual Plate (MCLM) and bigonial breadth was higher in males than females but the difference was non-significant (P>0.05). The accuracy of CBCT was found to be 89.7% in males and 88.5% in females. Conclusions: Gender determination by morphometric analysis of the mandible using cone beam computed tomography is an effective method and provides higher accuracy as compared to two-dimensional conventional radiographs.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Bhatia, A. ., & Bains, S. K. . (2023). Morphometric Analysis of Mandible for Gender determination in adult patients: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 13(2), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/2/2021.21
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Bhardwaj D, Kumar JS, Mohan V. Radiographic evaluation of mandible to predict the gender and age. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2014; 8(10):66. https://doi. org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9497.5045 PMid:25478451 PMCid:PMC4253269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/9497.5045
  2. Sassouni V. Dentofacial radiography in forensic dentistry. J Dent Res. 1963; 42:274 302. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220 345630420012901 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345630420012901
  3. de Oliveira Gamba T, Alves MC, Haiter-Neto F. Analysis of sexual dimorphism by locating the mandibular canal in images of cone-beam computed tomography. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2014; 2(2):72-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2013.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2013.12.007
  4. Gamba TDO, Alves MC, Haiter-Neto F. Mandibular sexual dimorphism analysis in CBCT scans of a Brazilian population. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2014; 2(2):104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2014.02.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2014.02.028
  5. Ghosh S, Vengal M, Pai KM. Remodelling of the human mandible in the gonial angle region: A panoramic, radiographic, cross-sectional study. Oral Radiol. 2009; 25(1):2-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-009-0002-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-009-0002-4
  6. Poongodi V, Kanmani R, Anandi MS, Krithika CL, Kannan A, Raghuram PH. Prediction of age and gender using digital radiographic method: A retrospective study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015; 7:S504 8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975- 7406.163518 PMid:26538907 PMCid:PMC4606649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.163518
  7. Abu El-fotouh MM, El-badawy FM, Abu El-ola El-nemr ESA. Sex determination of the Egyptian population using mandibular CBCT scans. Int J of Novel Research in Life Sci. 2018; 5:1-7.
  8. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(5):291-294. https://doi.org/10.1259/ dmfr/25500850 PMid:15585804
  9. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2004; 33(5):291-294. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/25500850 PMid:15585804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/25500850
  10. Kallalli BN, Rawson K, Ramaswamy VK, Zakarneh WH, Singh A, Zingade J. Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters by computed tomography: A prospective radiographic short study. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2016; 28:7-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-1363.189990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-1363.189990
  11. Abd Elsalam GS, El-Shal O, Shaaban A. Evaluation of different mandibular measurements by cone beam computed tomography as a forensic age and gender determination tools. Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls. 2019; 6(4):445-52. https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2019.7749.1098 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2019.7749.1098
  12. Tozoğlu Ü, Çakur B. Evaluation of the morphological changes in the mandible for dentate and totally edentate elderly population using cone-beam computed tomography. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014; 36(7):643- 649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1241-y PMid:24292424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1241-y
  13. Joo JK, Lim YJ, Kwon HB, Ahn SJ. Panoramic radiographic evaluation of the mandibular morphological changes in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71(2):357-362 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.690446 PMid:22774938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.690446
  14. Shams N, Razavi M, Mehrabi A, Salehin S, Sarikhani P. Determining gender and age by mandibular anatomy landmarks in Computed Tomography with Cone-Beam (CBCT). J Mol Biol Res. 2019; 9:33-40. https://doi. org/10.5539/jmbr.v9n1p33 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jmbr.v9n1p33
  15. Uppal MK, Iyengar AR, Patil S, Vasudev SB, Kotni RM, Joshi RK. Radiomorphometric localization of mental foramen and mandibular canal using cone beam computed tomography as an aid to gender determination-A retrospective study. International Healthcare Research Journal (IHRJ). 2018; 2(5):115-120. https://doi.org/10.26440/IHRJ/02_05/190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26440/IHRJ/02_05/190
  16. Jayam R, Annigeri R, Rao B, Gadiputi S, Gadiputi D. Panoramic study of mandibular basal bone height. J Orofac Sci. 2015; 7(1):7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-8844.157358 17. Kharoshah MA, Almadani O, Ghaleb SS, Zaki MK, Fattah YA. Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a modern Egyptian population. J Forensic Leg Med. 2010; 17:2135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2010.02.005 PMid:20382358 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-8844.157358
  17. Saloni, Verma P, Mahajan P, Puri A, Kaur S, Mehta S. Gender determination by morphometric analysis of mandibular ramus in Sriganganagar population: A digital panoramic study. Indian J Dent Res. 2020; 31:444-8. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_547_17 PMid:32769281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_547_17
  18. Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56:S13 6. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01599.x PMid:20950321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01599.x
  19. Indira AP, Markande A, David MP. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination A digital radiographic study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2012; 4:58 62. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.109885 PMid:23741142 PMCid:PMC3669477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.109885
  20. Rainio J, Lalu K, Ranta H, Penttilä A. Radiology in forensic expert team operations. Leg Med (Tokyo). 2001; 3:34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1344-6223(01)00009-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1344-6223(01)00009-8
  21. Sdos SR, Ramos DL, Cavalcanti Mde G. Applicability of 3D CT facial reconstruction for forensic individual identification. Pesqui Odontol Bras. 2003; 17:248. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-74912003000100005 PMid:12908055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-74912003000100005