Dermatoglyphics – A Concise Review on Basic Embryogenesis, Classification and Theories of Formation of Fingerprints

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sushma Bommanavar
Moham Anj
Muthu Karuppaiah
Yashwant Ingale
Manjusa Ingale

Abstract

The study of fingerprints known as Dermatoglyphics, has been utilized for individual identification in forensics for greater than 2000 years. They have been fully analyzed from various points of views such as embryogenesis, patterns of fingerprints and empirical mechanisms on how they are formed. Several studies have also linked them to certain human features such as gender, etc. This review paper is a systematic compilation on basic embryogenesis, classification of fingerprints and several canonical mechanisms involved in fingerprint formation. The knowledge about this is essential and can open new innovative areas for researchers working in forensics that can help solve the criminal disputes and cases.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Bommanavar, S. ., Anj, M. ., Karuppaiah, M., Ingale, Y., & Ingale, M. . (2022). Dermatoglyphics – A Concise Review on Basic Embryogenesis, Classification and Theories of Formation of Fingerprints. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 12(2), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/12/2/2020.615

References

  1. Michael Kuckena, Alan C. Newella. Fingerprint formation. J. Theor. Biol. 2005; 235: 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.12.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.12.020
  2. Michael Kucken. Models for fingerprint pattern formation. Forensic Science International. 2007; 171:85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.02.025
  3. H. Cummins, C. Midlo. Finger Prints Palms and Soles. Research Publishing Company Inc., 1976.
  4. Alaa Ahmed Abbood, Ghazali Sulong. Fingerprint Classification Techniques: A Review. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 1 January 2014; 11(1).
  5. K.A. Holbrook, Structure and function of the developing human skin. In: L.A. Goldsmith (Ed.), Biochemistry and Physiology of the Skin, Oxford University Press, 1983.
  6. Cummins, H. The topographic history of the volar pads (walking pads; Tastballen) in the human embryo. Contrib. Embryol. 1929; 113(20):105–126.
  7. Schaeuble. The Origin of the Palmar Triradies, Z. Morphol. Anthropol. 1932; 31:403–438.
  8. K. Bonnevie. Studies on papillary patterns in human fingers, J. Genet. 1924; 15:1–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02983100
  9. K. Bonnevie, What Does the Embryology of Papillary Patterns Teach About Their Importance as Racial and Family Character Part I and II, Z. Indukt. Verse Ver. 1929; 50:219–274.
  10. Bonnevie. The First Developmental Stages of Papillary Patterns of Human Finger Balls, Nyt Magazin for Naturvidenskaberne. 1927; 65:19–56.
  11. A.R. Hale, Breadth of epidermal ridges in the human fetus and its relation to the growth of the hand and foot, Anat. Rec. 1949; 105:763–776. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091050409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1091050409
  12. W. Hirsch, Morphological evidence concerning the problem of skin ridge formation, J. Ment. Defic. Res. 1973; 17: 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1973.tb01186.x
  13. M. Okajima, Dermal and epidermal structures of the volar skin, in: W. Wertelecki, C.C. Plato, D. Bergsma (Eds.), Dermatoglyphics—Fifty Years Later, Alan R. Liss Inc., 1979.
  14. N. Yager and A. Amin, “Fingerprint classification: a review,” 2004; 77–93, A. K. Jain, S. Prabhakar, S. Member, and L. Hong, “A Multichannel Approach to Fingerprint Classification,” 1999. 21(4): 348–359. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.761265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/34.761265
  15. Hong L., Jain A.K. "Classification of Fingerprint Patterns (based on Henry classification system)".
  16. http://ridgesandfurrows.homestead.com/fingerprint_ patterns.html
  17. Proceedings of 11th Scandividian Conference on Image Analysis, 1999.
  18. Subhashree S. Determination of Sex and Hand from Individual Fingerprints International Journal of Forensic Sciences 2017; 2(1): 000120. https://doi.org/10.23880/IJFSC-16000120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23880/IJFSC-16000120
  19. Kollmann, A. The Tactile Apparatus of the Hand of the Human Races and Apes in Its Development and Structure; Voss Verlag: Hamburg, Germany, 1883.
  20. Bonnevie, K. On the mechanics of papillary pattern I. Roux. Arch. Dev. Biol. 1927; 117, 384–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110970
  21. W. Abel, Critical Studies on the Development of Papillary Patterns on the Finger Berries, Z. Human. Inheritable.Cons. 1938; 21: 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00029394(38)91468-0
  22. C. Steffens, About Toe Bars at Gemini, Z. Morphol. Anthropol. 1938; 37: 218–258.
  23. Whipple, I. The ventral surface of the mammalian chiridium with especial reference to the condition found in man. Z. Morphol. Anthropol. 1904; 7: 261–368.
  24. Gould, E. A topographic study of the differentiation of the dermatoglyphics in the human embryo. Ph.D. Thesis, Tulane. 1948.
  25. Hirsch, W., Morphological evidence concerning the problem of skin ridge formation. J. Ment. Defic. Res. 1973; 17: 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1973.tb01186.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.1973.tb01186.x
  26. Schaumann B. Schaumann, Clinical aspects of dermatoglyphics, in: C.C. PLato, R.M.Garruto, B.A. Schaumann (Eds.), Dermatoglyphics: Science in Transition, Wiley-Liss Inc., 1991.
  27. Blechschmidt E. Blechschmidt, The Embryonic Design Functions of the HumanEpidermis, Z. Morphol. Anthropol. 1963; 54: 163–172.
  28. D.A. Dell, B.L. Munger, The early embryogenesis of papillary (sweat duct) ridges in primate glabrous skin. The dermatotopic map of cutaneous mechanoreceptors dermatoglyphics, Comp. Neurol. J. 1986; 244: 511– 532. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902440408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902440408
  29. S.J. Moore, B.L. Munger, The early ontogeny of the afferent nerves and papillary ridges in human digital glabrous skin, Dev. Brain Res. 1989; 48: 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-3806(89)90097-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-3806(89)90097-7
  30. K.A. Morohunfola, T.E. Jones, B.L. Munger, The differentiation of the skin and its appendages. I. Normal development of the papillary ridges, Anat. Rec. 1992; 232: 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092320414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092320414
  31. K.A. Morohunfola, T.E. Jones, B.L. Munger, The differentiation of the skin and its appendages. II. Altered development of papillary ridges following neuralectomy, Anat. Rec. 1992; 232: 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092320415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.1092320415
  32. D.E. Bentil. Aspects of Dynamic Pattern Generation in Embryology and Epidemiology, PhD thesis, Wolfson College Oxford, 1990.
  33. D.E. Bentil, J.D. Murray, On the mechanical theory for biological pattern formation, Phys. D 1993; 63: 161–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(93)90153-R DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(93)90153-R
  34. J.D. Murray, G.F. Oster, Cell traction models for generating pattern and form in morphogenesis, J. Math. Biol. 1984; 19:265–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277099 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277099
  35. Smriti Ramdas, Sushma Bommanavar, Rajendra Baad, Nupura Vibhute, Uzma Belgaumi, Vidya Kadashetti, Wasim Kamate1 Correlation and Comparsion of Dactyloscopy and Palatoscopy with blood groups among students in KIMS, Karad. Med J DY Patil Vidyapeeth 2019; 12:111–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_65_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/mjdrdypu.mjdrdypu_65_18
  36. Srigiri Surath, Sushma Bommanavar, Sudha B Mattigatti, Uzma Belgaumi, Vidya Kadashetti, Wasim Kamate, Nupura Vibhute. Correlation and Comparison of Cheiloscopy, Dactyloscopy and Palatoscopy with Blood Groups among Dental Students from Western Maharashtra. Indian J. Forensic Med. Toxicol. 2020; 14(1): 99.
  37. Sisodia M, Bommanavar S, Baad R, Vibhute N, Belgaumi U, Kadashetti V. Correlation and comparison of dactyloscopy and Cheiloscopy with blood groups – An institutional study. Indian J Dent Res 2020; 5: 728–33. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_368_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_368_18