Denture labels: Various types and their abilities to resist different assaults


Rashmi S. Phulari
Rajendrasinh Rathore
Prachi Jariwala
Aalap Kapuriya
Arpan Shah


Introduction: The use of denture labels for the purpose of identification has been well documented. A number of labels for marking the denture are documented till date demonstrating the ease of fabrication and its potential value in identification. Therefore, it becomes essential that these denture labels fulfill the requisites of an ideal denture label and thus should be able to sustain the various assaults to which they might be subjected simulating a crime scene. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the ability of various denture labels to withstand different types of assaults thereby evaluating the performance of routinely used denture labels. Materials and Methods: Four polymethylmethacrylate blocks were fabricated where the inclusion labels were incorporated on one side, and the surface labels were marked on the other side. Each of the blocks was then placed in different containers to be subjected to different assaults such as acid, alkali, water, and heat of increasing temperature. Results: Inclusion labels performed better as compared to surface marking labels. Among the inclusion labels, the metallic labels performed the best. Conclusion: The metallic inclusion labels were able to withstand most assaults than any other inclusion labels or surface marking labels. Due to easy availability, cost-effectiveness, ease of incorporation and inertness, metallic labels are best suited as denture labels for personal identification.


How to Cite
Rashmi S. Phulari, Rajendrasinh Rathore, Prachi Jariwala, Aalap Kapuriya, & Arpan Shah. (2017). Denture labels: Various types and their abilities to resist different assaults. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 9(3), 181–186.


  1. Avon SL. Forensic odontology: The roles and responsibilities of the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70:453‑8.
  2. Pretty IA, Sweet D. A look at forensic dentistry – Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity. Br Dent J 2001;190:359‑66.
  3. Richmond R, Pretty IA. Identification of the edentulous individual: An investigation into the accuracy of radiographic identifications. J Forensic Sci 2010;55:984‑7.
  4. Thomas CJ. The role of the denture in identification: A review. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1984;2:13‑6.
  5. Richmond R, Pretty IA. Contemporary methods of labeling dental prostheses –A review of the literature. J Forensic Sci 2006;51:1120‑6.
  6. Millet C, Jeannin C. Incorporation of microchips to facilitate denture identification by radio frequency tagging. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:588‑90.
  7. Thomas CJ, Mori T, Miyakawa O, Chung HG. In search of a suitable denture marker. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1995;13:9‑13.
  8. Stavrianos C, Petalotis N, Metska M, Stavrianou I, Papadopoulos C. The value of identification marking on dentures. Balkan J Stomatol 2007;11:212‑6.
  9. RichmondR, Pretty IA. A range of postmortem assault experiments conducted on a variety of denture labels used for the purpose of identification of edentulous individuals. J Forensic Sci 2009;54:411‑4.
  10. Polyzois GL. Reinforcement of denture acrylic resin: The effect of metal inserts and denture resin type on fracture resistance. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1995;3:275‑8.
  11. Joshi NP, Sanghvi SJ. Water sorption by maxillary acrylic resin denture base and consequent changes in vertical dimension. J Pierre Fauchard Acad 1994;8:97‑106.
  12. May KB, Razzoog ME, Koran A 3rd, Robinson E. Denture base resins: Comparison study of color stability. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:78‑82.
  13. Colvenkar SS. Lenticular card: A new method for denture identification. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21:112‑4.
  14. Bansal PK, Sharma A, Bhanot R. Denture labelling: A new approach. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2:76‑8.
  15. Rajendran V, Karthigeyan S, Manoharan S. Denture marker using a two‑dimensional bar code. J Prosthet Dent 2012;107:207‑8.
  16. Ling BC, Nambiar P, Low KS, Lee CK. Copper vapour laser ID labelling on metal dentures and restorations. J Forensic Sci 2010;55: 984‑7.
  17. Anehosur GV, Acharya AB, Nadiger RK. Usefulness of patient photograph as a marker for identifying denture‑wearers in India. Gerodontology 2010;27:272‑7.
  18. Luthra R, Arora S, Meshram S. Denture marking for forensic identification using memory card: An innovative technique. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2012;12:231‑5.
  19. Nuzzolese E, Marcario V, Di Vella G. Incorporation of radio frequency identification tag in dentures to facilitate recognition and forensic human identification. Open Dent J 2010;4:33‑6.