Forensic odontology: A prosthodontic view

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sulekha Gosavi
Siddharth Gosavi

Abstract

The most common role of the forensic dentist is the identification of deceased individuals. Dental identifications have always played a key role in natural and manmade disaster situations, and in particular, the mass casualties normally associated with aviation disasters. Because of the lack of a comprehensive fingerprint database, dental identification continues to be crucial in the world. An all-acrylic resin appliance such as a full denture or an all-acrylic partial denture (or orthodontic appliance), prior to delivery, could be inscribed with the patient′s full name on a substrate (paper, metal) and sealed inconspicuously into the surface of a denture by various processes. It has been noted by several authors that in many cases of air disaster where the limbs are completely burnt off, some denture materials survive, especially the posterior part of acrylic dentures and metal-based dentures. Thus, marked dental prostheses (full and partial dentures, mouthguards and removal orthodontic appliances) would lead to rapid identification in the event of accidents and disaster.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Sulekha Gosavi, & Siddharth Gosavi. (2012). Forensic odontology: A prosthodontic view. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 4(1), 38–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.99162

References

  1. Keiser-Neilsen S. Forensic odontology. Int Dent J 1968;18:668-81.
  2. Harvey W. Dental identification and forensic odontology. London: Henry Kimpton publisher; 1976. p. 2.
  3. Jacob RF, Shalla CL. Postmortem identification of the edentulous deceased denture tissue surface anatomy. J forensic Sci 1987;32;698-702.
  4. Hauck MM, Siegel JA. Fundamentals of forensic science. 2nd ed, Burlington: Elsevier Academic Press, 2010. p. 471-3.
  5. Dolinik D, Matshes EW, Lew EO. Forensic pathology- Principles and practice. London: Elsevier academic press; 2005. p. 610-4.
  6. Roy A, Tumati S. Forensic gene banking; issues and prospects. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2008;2;1-6.
  7. Gould GA. Forensic odontology: A global activity. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004;32;410-5.
  8. Preety A, Sweet D. A look at forensic dentistry part 1; The role of teeth in the determination of human identity. Br Dent J 2001;190;359-66.
  9. Brannon RB, Kessler HP. Problem in mass disaster dental identification: A retrospective review. J Forensic Sci 1994;44;123-7.
  10. Marella GL, Rossi P. An approach to identification by means of dental prostheses in a burnt corps. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1999;17;16-9.
  11. Andrews F. A look at forensic odontology. Enlighten Publisher; 2007. p. 1-25.
  12. Skinner M, Alempijevic D, Stanojevic A. In the absence of dental records, do we need forensic odontologists at mass grave sites? Forensic Sci Int 2010;201:22-6.
  13. Pretty IA. Forensic dentistry 1, Identification of human remains. Dent update 2007;34;621-2.
  14. Brannon RB, Kessler HP. Problems in mass disaster dental identification a retrospective review. J Forensic Sci 1999;44;123-7.
  15. Woodward JD. Denture marking for identification. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99;59-60.
  16. Pyke TF. Personal identification from artificial dentures. Aust Dent J 1970;15:495-8.
  17. Haines DH. Identification in mass disasters from dental prosthesis. Int J Forensic Dent 1973;1:11-5.
  18. Luntz LL, Luntz D. A case in forensic odontology: A bite-mark in a multiple homicide. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973;36:72-8.
  19. Shrof FA. Forensic odontology for the general practitioner. Aust Dent J 1973;18;298-303.
  20. Jerman AC. Denture identification. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;80:1358-9.
  21. Lose FM. Denture identification. J Prosth Dent 1958;8:940-1.
  22. Richmond R, Pretty IA. Contemporary methods of labeling dental prostheses – a review of the literature. J Forensic Sci 2006;51;1120-6.
  23. Nuzzolese E, Marcario V, Di Vella G. Incorporation of Radio frequency identification tag in dentures to facilitate recognition and forensic human identification. Open Dent J 2010;4;33-6.
  24. Meyer HJ, Chansue N, Monticelli F. Implantation of radiofrequency identification device (RFID) microchip in disaster victim identification (DVI) Forensic Sci Int 2006;157:168-71.
  25. Harvey W, Butler O, Furness J, Laird R. The bigger murder. Dental, medical, police and legal aspects of a case “in some ways unique, difficult and puzzling”. J Forensic Sci Soc 1966;8;157-219.
  26. Woodward JD. Denture marking for identification. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;99;59-60.
  27. Richmond R, Pretty IA. Contemporary methods of labeling dental prostheses–a review of the literature. J Forensic Sci 2006;51:1120-6.
  28. Seals RR Jr, Seals DJ. Hospital dentistry: The importance of denture identification. Spec Care Dentist 1985;5;164-8.
  29. Gustafson G. Forensic odontology. London: Staples Press; 1966. p. 29.
  30. Haines DH. Identification in mass disasters from dental prostheses. Int J Forensic Dentist 1973;1;11-5.
  31. Millet C, Jeanin C. Incorporation of microchips to facilitate denture identification by radio frequency tagging. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92;588-90.
  32. Dorion RB. Marking of dentures. J Can Dent Assoc (Tor) 1972;38;14.
  33. Patil MS, Patil SB, Acharya AB. Palatine rugae and their significance in clinical dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139;1471-8.
  34. American Board of Forensic Odontology; available from: Http:// www.abfo.org. [Last cited on 2010 March 13].
  35. American Academy of Forensic Science. Available from: Http:// www.aafs.org. [Last cited on 2010 March 13].
  36. Friedman RB, Cornwell KA, Lorton L. Dental characteristics of a large military population useful for identification. J Forens Sci 1989;6:1357-64.
  37. Borrman HI, DiZinno JA, Wasén J, René N. Ondenture marking. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1999;17:20-6.