Palatal rugae patterns for establishing individuality

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

A Indira
Manish Gupta
Maria David

Abstract

Introduction: Palatal rugoscopy is the name given to the study of palatal rugae. Rugae pattern are widely considered to remain unchanged during an individual′s lifetime. The rugae pattern has the potential to remain intact by virtue of their internal position in the head when most other anatomical structures are destroyed or burned. Moreover, rugae pattern are considered to be unique similar to fingerprints and are advocated in personal identification. Objectives: The purpose of the study is to establish, individual identity using palatal rugae patterns. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 100 study models all of whom were subjects above 14 years old. Martin dos Santos′ classification was followed based on form and position to assess the individuality of rugae pattern. Results: Each individual had different rugae patterns including dizygous twins and the rugae patterns were not symmetrical, both in number and in its distribution. Conclusion: The preliminary study undertaken here shows no two palates are alike in terms of their rugae pattern. Palatal rugae possess unique characteristics as they are absolutely individualistic and therefore, can be used as a personal soft-tissue ′oral′ print for identification in forensic cases.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
A Indira, Manish Gupta, & Maria David. (2012). Palatal rugae patterns for establishing individuality. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 4(1), 02–05. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.99149

References

  1. Acharya AB, Sivapathasundharam B. Forensic Odontology. In: Rajendran R, Sivapathasundharam B, Editors. Shafer’s Textbook of Oral Pathology, 6th ed, Noida: Elsevier: 2009. p. 871-99.
  2. Stimson P, Mertz CA. Scientific Methods of Identification. In Forensic Dentistry, 1st ed., Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press LLC; 1997. p. 1-36.
  3. Acharya AB. Teaching forensic odontology: An opinion on its content and format. Eur J Dent Educ 2006;10:137-41.
  4. Nayak P, Acharya AB, Padmini AT, Kaveri H. Differences in the palatal rugae shape in two populations of India. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:977-82.
  5. English WR, Summitt JB, Oesterle LJ, Brannon RB, Morlang WM. “Individuality of Human Palatal Rugae”. J Forensic Sci 1988;33:718-26.
  6. Caldas IM, Magalhales T, Afonso A. Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int 2007;165:1-9.
  7. Venegas VH, Valenzuda JS. Palatal rugae: Systemic analysis of its shape and dimensions for use in human dentition. Indian J Dent Res 2005;16:51-5.
  8. Venegas VH, Valenzuela JS, López MC, Galdames IC. Palatal Rugae: Systematic analysis of its shape and dimensions for use in human identification. Int J Morphol 2009;27:819-25.
  9. Muthsubramanian M, Limson KS, Julian R. Analysis of rugae in burn victims and cadevors to stimulate rugae identification in cases of incenaration and decomposition. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2005;23:26-9.
  10. Abou El-Fotouh MM, El-Sharkawy GZ. A study of palatal rugae pattern (rugoscopy) in an Egyptian population. J Egypt Dent Assoc 1998;44:3177-84.
  11. Patil MS, Patil SB, Acharya AB. Palatine rugae and their significance in clinical dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1471-8.
  12. Limson KS, Julian R. Computerized recording of the palatal rugae pattern and an evolution of its application in forensic identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2004;22:1-4.
  13. Kapali S, Tomnsend G, Richards L, Parish T. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian Aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J 1997;42:129-33.
  14. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal ruga pattern in six Southern African human populations, Part I: A description of the populations and a method for its investigation. J Dent Assoc South Afr 1983;38:547-53.
  15. Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal ruga pattern in six Southern African human populations, Part II: Inter-racial differences. J Dent Assoc South Afr 1983;38:166-72.
  16. Pretty IA. Forensic dentistry: 1. Identification of human remains. Dent Update 2007;34:621-2,624-6,629-30.
  17. Ohtani M, Nishida N, Chiba T, Fukuda M, Miyamoto Y, Yoshioka N. Indication and limitations of using palatal rugae for personal identification in edentulous cases. Forensic Sci Int 2008;176:178-82.