Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination - A digital radiographic study

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 1, 2012
https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.109885
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 4, Issue 2, July-December 2012

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Annamalai Indira
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M. R. Ambedkar Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka
Archana Markande
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M. R. Ambedkar Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka
Maria David
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M. R. Ambedkar Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka

Abstract

Background: The identification of skeletal remains is of paramount importance in medico-legal investigations. The skeletal components most often investigated for gender determination are the pelvis and skull, with the mandible being a practical element to analyze sexual dimorphism in the fragmented bones. Presence of a dense layer of compact bone makes it very durable and well preserved than many other bones. Mandibular ramus can be used to differentiate between sexes and it also expresses strong univariate sexual dimorphism. When skeleton sex determination is considered, metric analyses on the radiographs are often found to be of superior value owing to their objectivity, accuracy, and reproducibility. Aims and Objectives: (1) To measure, compare, and evaluate the various measurements of mandibular ramus as observed on orthopantomographs. (2) To assess the usefulness of mandibular ramus as an aid in sex determination. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using orthopantomographs of 50 males and 50 females, which were taken using Kodak 8000C Digital Panoramic and Cephalometric System (73 kVp, 12 mA, 13.9 s). Mandibular ramus measurements were carried out using Master View 3.0 software. The measurements of the mandibular ramus were subjected to discriminant function analysis. Results: We observed each variable of the mandibular ramus to be a significant predictor in classifying a given sample (P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study on mandibular ramus measurements using orthopantomograph shows strong evidence suggesting that the ramus can be used for gender determination for forensic analysis.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Annamalai Indira, Archana Markande, & Maria David. (2012). Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex determination - A digital radiographic study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 4(2), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.109885
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Saini V, Srivastava R, Rai RK, Shamal SN, Singh TB, Tripathi SK. Mandibular ramus: An indicator for sex in fragmentary mandible. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(Suppl1):S13-6.
  2. Scheuer L. Application of osteology to forensic medicine. Clin Anat 2002;15:297-312.
  3. Durić M, Rakocević Z, Donić D. The Reliability of sex determination of skeletons from forensic context in the Balkans. Forensic Sci Int 2005;147:159-64.
  4. Hu KS, Koh KS, Han SH, Shin KJ, Kim HJ. Sex determination using nonmetric characteristics of the mandible in Koreans. J Forensic Sci 2006;51:1376-82.
  5. Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE, Dadour I. Discriminant function sexing of the mandible of Indigenous South Africans. Forensic Sci Int 2008;179:84.e1-5.
  6. Humphrey LT, Dean MC, Stringer CB. Morphological variation in great ape and modern human mandibles. J Anat 1999;195:491-513.
  7. Vodanovic M, Dumancic J, Demo Z, Mihelic D. Determination of sex by discriminant function analysis of mandibles from two Croatian archaeological sites. Acta Stomatol Croat 2006;40:263-77.
  8. Sassouni V. Dentofacial radiography in forensic dentistry. J dent Res Jan./Feb. Supplement 1963;42(1):274-302.
  9. Schulze R, Krummenauer F, Schalldac F, d’Hooedt B. Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:52-6.
  10. Kahana T, Hiss J. Forensic radiology. Br J Radiol 1999;72:129-33.
  11. Franklin D, Oxnard CE, O’Higgins P, Dadour I. Sexual dimorphism in the subadult mandible: Quantification using geometric morphometrics. J Forensic Sci 2007;52:6-10.
  12. Franklin D, O’Higgins P, Oxnard CE. Sexual dimorphism in the mandible of indigenous South Africans: A geometric morphometric approach. South African Journal of Science 2008;104:101-6.
  13. Razi T, Moslemzade SH, Razi S. Comparison of linear dimensions and angular measurements on panoramic images taken with two machines. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects 2009;3:7-10.
  14. Shahabi M, Ramazanzadeh BA, Mokhber N. Comparison between the external gonial angle in panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms of adult patients with Class I malocclusion. J Oral Sci 2009;51:425-9.
  15. Laster WS, Ludlow JB, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy and prediction of asymmetry in panoramic radiographic images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005;34:343-9.
  16. Kambylafkas P, Murdock E, Gilda E, Tallents RH, KyrkanidesS. Validity of panoramic radiographs for measuring mandibular asymmetry. Angle Orthod 2006;76:388-93.
  17. Oettlé AC, Pretorius E, Steyn M. Geometric Morphometric Analysis of Mandibular Ramus Flexure. Am J Phys Anthropol 2005;128:623-9.
  18. Hill CA. Technical Note: Evaluating Mandibular Ramus Flexure as a Morphological Indicator of Sex. Am J Phys Anthropol 2000;111:573-7.
  19. Giles E. Sex determination by discriminant function analysis of the mandible. Am J Phys Anthropol 1964;22:129-35.
  20. Steyn M, Iscan MY. Sexual dimorphism in the crania and mandibles of South African whites. Forensic Sci Int 1998;98:9-16.
  21. Suazo GI, Zavando MD, Smith RL. Evaluating accuracy and precision in morphologic traits for sexual dimorphism in malnutrition human skull: A comparative study. Int J Morphol 2008;26:877-81