The relationship of forensic odontology with various dental specialties in the articles published in a National and an International Forensic Odontology Journal: A 5-year content analysis

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ravi Thetakala
B Chandrashekar
Siddanna Sunitha
Priyanka Sharma

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study is to assess the quantum of articles published by various dental specialties in a National and an International Forensic Odontology Journal from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. Settings and Design: The present study is a 5-year retrospective content analysis study. Subjects and Methods: Data were collected from two forensic odontology journals (Journal of Forensic Odonto Stomatology [JOFS] and Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences [JFDS]) which are subscribed by institutional library. The article contents were scrutinized by one investigator and categorized into nine individual dental specialties based on the new working classification proposed for forensic odontology. Statistical Analysis Used: The quantum of articles published by various dental specialties and the various focus areas in each specialty were assessed using Chi-square test. Results: Among all the published articles, a maximum number of articles were related to the Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology (32.6%) in JFDS with Cheiloscopy (46.7%) being more focused area and to the Department of Prosthodontics (25.7%) in JFOS with Bite mark analysis (66.7%) being more focused area. Conclusions: There was a scarcity of information about the relationship of forensic odontology with various dental specialties in the articles published in JFDS and JFOS. The editorial board of journals should expand and elaborate their scope of journals to various focus areas of forensic odontology. This will encourage the researchers to explore in the different focus areas which are most neglected as of now.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Ravi Thetakala, B Chandrashekar, Siddanna Sunitha, & Priyanka Sharma. (2017). The relationship of forensic odontology with various dental specialties in the articles published in a National and an International Forensic Odontology Journal: A 5-year content analysis. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 9(2), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_17_16

References

  1. Shamim T. Publication trends in the journal of forensic dental sciences 2009‑2012. J Sci Res 2013;2:152‑6.
  2. Verma AK, Kumar S, Rathore S, Pandey A. Role of dental expert in forensic odontology. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2014;5:2-5.
  3. Zakirulla M, Meer A. Modern tools in forensic dentistry. Int J Contemp Dent 2011;2:28-32.
  4. Avon SL. Forensic odontology: The roles and responsibilities of the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70:453-8.
  5. Agarwal N, Ahuja P, Sinha A, Singh A. Age estimation using maxillary central incisors: A radiographic study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;4:97-100.
  6. Shamim T. A new working classification proposed for forensic odontology. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2011;21:59.
  7. Shamim T. The relationship of forensic odontology with various dental specialties in the articles published in the journal of forensic odonto‑stomatology from 2005 to 2012. Indian J Dent 2015;6:75‑80.
  8. Preethi S, EinsteinA, Sivapathasundharam B. Awareness of forensic odontology among dental practitioners in Chennai: A knowledge, attitude, practice study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:63‑6.
  9. Prabhu RV, Dinkar AD, Prabhu VD, Rao PK. Cheiloscopy: Revisited. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;4:47-52.
  10. Bharathi S, Thenmozh MS. Cheiloscopy – Lip print, an determination of sex and individual. J Pharm Sci Res 2015;7:330-3.
  11. Kaur S, Krishan K, Chatterjee PM, Kanchan T. Analysis and identification of bite marks in forensic casework. Oral Health Dent Manag 2013;12:127-31.
  12. Mahajan A, Batra AP, Khurana BS, Seema J, Kaur J. Role of bite mark analysis in identification of a person. Glob J Med Public Health 2012;1:56‑9.
  13. Datta P, Sood S, Rastogi P, Bhargava K, Bhargava D, Yadav M. DNA profiling in forensic dentistry. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2012;34:156‑9.
  14. Berketa J, James H, Marino V. A pilot study in the recovery and recognition of non-osseointegrated dental implants following cremation. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2011;29:38-44.
  15. Kumar VJ, Gopal KS. Reliability of age estimation using Demirjian’s 8 teeth method and India specific formula. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:19-22.
  16. Sinha S, Umapathy D, Shashikanth MC, Misra N, Mehra A, Singh AK. Dental age estimation by Demirjian’s and Nolla’s method: A comparative study among children attending a dental college in Lucknow (UP). J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2014;26:279‑86.
  17. Krishnappa S, Srinath S, Bhardwaj P, Mallaya CH. Palatal rugoscopy: Implementation in forensic odontology – A review. J Adv Med Dent Sci 2013;1:53-9.
  18. Narang RS, Manchanda AS, Malhotra R, Bhatia HS. Sex determination by mandibular canine index and molar odontometrics: A comparative study. Indian J Oral Sci 2014;5:16‑20.
  19. Puri PM, Khajuria H. Disaster victim identification (DVI) through dental evidence: Overview and challenges in Indian scenario. Int J Res Sci Innov 2015;2:54-7.