Cheiloscopy and dactyloscopy: Do they dictate personality patterns?

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Mohammed Abidullah
M Kumar
Kavita Bhorgonde
D Prasad Reddy

Abstract

Context: Cheiloscopy and dactyloscopy, both are well-established forensic tools used in individual identification in any scenario be it a crime scene or civil cause. Like finger prints, lip prints are unique and distinguishable for every individual. But their relationship to personality types has not been established excepting the hypothesis stating that finger prints could explain these personality patterns. Aims: The study was aimed to record and correlate the lip and finger prints with that of character/personality of a person. Settings and Design: The lip and finger prints and character of a person were recorded and the data obtained was subjected for statistical analysis, especially for Pearson′s Chi-square test and correlation/association between the groups was also studied. Materials and Methods: The study sample comprised of 200 subjects, 100 males and 100 females, aged between 18 and 30 years. For recording lip prints, brown/pink-colored lipstick was applied on the lips and the subjects were asked to spread uniformly over the lips. Lip prints were traced in the normal rest position on a plain white bond paper. For recording the finger prints, imprints of the fingers were taken on a plain white bond paper using ink pad. The collected prints were visualized using magnifying lens. To record the character of person, a pro forma manual for multivariable personality inventory by Dr. BC Muthayya was used. Statistical Analysis Used: Data obtained was subjected for statistical analysis, especially for Pearson′s Chi-square test and correlation/association between the groups was also studied. Results: In males, predominant lip pattern recorded was Type I with whorls-type finger pattern and the character being ego ideal, pessimism, introvert, and dogmatic; whereas in females, predominant lip pattern recorded was Type II with loops-type finger pattern and the character being neurotic, need achievers, and dominant. Conclusion: Many studies on lip pattern, finger pattern, palatal rugae, etc., for individual identification and gender determination exist, but correlative studies are scanty. This is the first study done on correlating patterns, that is, lip and finger pattern with the character of a person. With this study we conclude that this correlation can be used as an adjunct in the investigatory process in forensic sciences.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Mohammed Abidullah, M Kumar, Kavita Bhorgonde, & D Prasad Reddy. (2015). Cheiloscopy and dactyloscopy: Do they dictate personality patterns?. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 7(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.155079

References

  1. Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathrod V. Cheiloscopy: The study of lip prints in sex identification. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:24‑7.
  2. Chaitanya BN, Premalatha BR, Jude J. Cheiloscopy: A new aid for sex identification in forensic science. Indian J Forensic Odontol 2009;2:131-6.
  3. NagasupriyaA, Dhanpal R, Reena K, Saraswathi T, Ramandran C. Pattern ‑”A crime solver”. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:3‑7.
  4. Gondivakr SM, Indurkar A, Degwekar S, Bhowate R. Cheiloscopy for sex determination. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:56-60.
  5. Saraswathi TR, Mishra G, Ranganathan K. Study of Lip Prints. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:28-31.
  6. Rastogi P, Pillai KR. A study of finger prints in relation to gender and blood groups. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2010;32:11-4.
  7. Personality. Encyclopedia. Available form: http://encyclopedia2. thefreedictionary.com/Personality [Last accessed on 2013Apr 30].
  8. Edward D. Campbell. A history of dermatoglyphics, palmistry and character identity. Available from: http://www.handanalysis. co.uk[Last accessed on 2012 May].
  9. Minkin V. Fingerprints and the thermodynamics of human development. J Hum Thermodyn 2008;4:8-12.
  10. Jung CG, Baynes HG. Psychological types or the psychology of individuation. Vol. 6. Collected Works. London: Kegan Paul Trench Trubner; 1921. ISBN 0-691- 01813-8.
  11. Sivapathasundaram B, Prakash PA, Sivakumar G. Lip Prints (cheiloscopy). Indian J Dent Res 2001;12:234-7.
  12. Verghese AJ, Somasekar M, Umesh BR. A study of lip prints in people of Kerala. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2009;32:6-8.
  13. Tsuchihashi Y. Studies of person identification by means of lip prints. Forensic Sci 1974;3:233-48.
  14. Vahanwala SP, Parekh BK. Study of lip prints as an aid to forensic methodology. J Forensic Med Toxicol 2000;17:12-8.
  15. Vahanwala S, Nayak CD, Pagare SS. Study of lip print as an aid for sex determination. Medico-Legal Update 2005;5:93-8.
  16. Henry ER. Classification and uses of finger prints. London: George Routledge and Sons; 1900.
  17. Muthayya BC. Manual for Multivariable personality inventory (MPI). Agra: Agra Psychological Research Cell. 1973.
  18. Patil S, Paul I, Madhusudan AS, Gayathri R, Sowmya GV. A study of lip prints in relation to gender, family and blood group. Int J Oral Max Path 2010;1:4-7.
  19. Nitin MD, Balraj BM, Manjunath B, Mestri SC. Study of finger print classification and their gender distribution among South Indian population. J Forensic Leg Med 2009;16:460-3.
  20. Reddy GG. Finger dermatoglyphics of the Bagathas of Araku valley (A. P). Indian J Phys Anthropol 1975;42:225-8.
  21. Ekanem EP, Eluwa MA, Udoaffah GU, Ekanem TB, Akpantah AO. Digital dermatophylics pattern of annang ethic group in akwa ibom state of Nigeria. Internet J Bio Anthropol 2009;3.
  22. Reddy BM, Reddy CP. Population structure and pattern of Dermatoglyphics variation in Andhra Pradesh, India. IJHG 2001;1:203-9.