Tongue prints: A novel biometric and potential forensic tool

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

T Radhika
Nadeem Jeddy
S Nithya

Abstract

Tongue is a vital internal organ well encased within the oral cavity and protected from the environment. It has unique features which differ from individual to individual and even between identical twins. The color, shape, and surface features are characteristic of every individual, and this serves as a tool for identification. Many modes of biometric systems have come into existence such as fingerprint, iris scan, skin color, signature verification, voice recognition, and face recognition. The search for a new personal identification method secure has led to the use of the lingual impression or the tongue print as a method of biometric authentication. Tongue characteristics exhibit sexual dimorphism thus aiding in the identification of the person. Emerging as a novel biometric tool, tongue prints also hold the promise of a potential forensic tool. This review highlights the uniqueness of tongue prints and its superiority over other biometric identification systems. The various methods of tongue print collection and the classification of tongue features are also elucidated.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
T Radhika, Nadeem Jeddy, & S Nithya. (2016). Tongue prints: A novel biometric and potential forensic tool. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 8(3), 117–119. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.195119

References

  1. Zaidi FN, Meadows P, Jacobowitz O, Davidson TM. Tongue anatomy and physiology, the scientific basis for a novel targeted neurostimulation system designed for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. Neuromodulation 2013;16:376‑86.
  2. Zhang DD, editor. Biometric Solutions: For Authentication in an E‑world. Vol. 697. Germany: Springer Science and Business Media; 2012. p. 1-21.
  3. Goyal S, KansalG, Goyal P, Arya S, Sharma V. Dental considerations in obstructive sleep apnea patients: A review. IJCCR 2015;5:91-8.
  4. Anastasi JK, Currie LM, Kim GH. Understanding diagnostic reasoning in TCM practice: Tongue diagnosis. Altern Ther Health Med 2009;15:18-28.
  5. Bing Z, Hongcai W, editors. Diagnostics of Traditional Chinese Medicine. London: Singing Dragon; 2011.
  6. Bhattacharyya D, Ranjan R, Alisherov F, Choi M. Biometric authentication: A review. Int J U E Serv Sci Technol 2009;2:13-28.
  7. Diwakar M, Maharshi M. An extraction and recognition of tongue-print images for biometrics authentication system. Int J Comput Appl 2013;61:36‑42.
  8. Liu Z, Zhang D, Tang QL. A tongue-print image database for recognition. Mach Learn Cybern 2007;4:2235-8.
  9. Stefanescu CL, Popa MF, Candea LS. Preliminary study on the tongue‑based forensic identification. Rom J Leg Med 2014;22:263‑6.
  10. Zhang B, Zhang H. Significant geometry features in tongue image analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;2015:897580.
  11. Yan Z, Wang K, Li N. Computerized feature quantification of sublingual veins from color sublingual images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2009;93:192-205.
  12. Ménard L, Aubin J, Thibeault M, Richard G. Measuring tongue shapes and positions with ultrasound imaging: A validation experiment using an articulatory model. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2012;64:64‑72.
  13. Musa OA, Elsheikh TE, Hassona ME. Tongues: Could they also be another fingerprint? Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2014;8:171‑5.
  14. Nagalaxmi V, Ugrappa S, Naga Jyothi M, Ch L, Maloth KN, Kodangal S. Cheiloscopy, palatoscopy and odontometrics in sex prediction and dis-crimination –A comparative study. Open Dent J 2015;8:269‑79.