Prosthodontics an “arsenal” in forensic dentistry

Authors

  • Lakshmana Bathala Department of Prosthodontics, Lenora Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh
  • Narendra Rachuri Department of Prosthodontics, Lenora Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh
  • Srinivas Rayapati Department of Prosthodontics, Lenora Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh
  • Sudheer Kondaka Department of Prosthodontics, Lenora Institute of Dental Sciences, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.195102

Keywords:

Antemortem records, dental profiling, identification of dentures, inclusion methods, marking/labeling, palatal rugoscopy

Abstract

After major disasters such as earthquakes, fires, floods, tsunami, bomb blasts or terrorist attacks, accurate, and early identification of the dead and injured becomes an utmost importance. Restorations, cariesteeth, missingteeth and/or prostheses are most useful aids for the dental identification. At times, only identifiable remains are a victim's partial or complete dentures. The central principle of dental identification is that postmortem dental remains can be compared with antemortem dental records which include, studycasts, radiographs, etc., to confirm the identity of the victims. Marking/labeling dentures have been considered an important aid in forensic dentistry. Other than finger printing, when compared with all the methods, the marking/labeling of dentures is an accurate and rapid method to identify the unknown victims. There are no standardized methods to follow, but dental practitioners needs to maintain some dental records of their patients. This may include documentation of the “marking of dentures.” The preparedness is the key to success in mass disaster identification. The aim of this review article is to discuss the methods of denture identification, advantages of denture labeling for the rapid identification during major disasters/accidents and the importance of maintaining the patient records.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Shukla D, Chowdhry A, Bablani D, Jain P, Thapar R. Establishing the reliability of palatal rugae pattern in individual identification (following orthodontic treatment). J Forensic Odontostomatol 2011;29:20-9.

Chowdhry A, Sircar K, Popli DB, Tandon A. Image manipulation: Fraudulence in digital dental records: Study and review. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014;6:31‑5.

Kapoor P, Miglani R. Transverse changes in lateral and medial aspects of palatal rugae after mid palatal expansion: A pilot study. J Forensic Dent Sci 2015;7:8-13.

Kapali S, Townsend G, Richards L, Parish T. Palatal rugae patterns in Australian aborigines and Caucasians. Aust Dent J 1997;42:129-33.

Acharya AB. Is the research of lip prints and palatal rugae undertaken in India a misdirected endeavor? An opinion based on trends in publication in this journal and international journals. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014;6:149‑50.

Lysell L. Plicae palatinae transversae and papilla incisiva in man; a morphologic and genetic study. Acta Odontol Scand 1955;13 Suppl 18:5-137.

Thomas CJ, Kotze TJ. The palatal ruga pattern: A new classification. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1983;38:153-7.

Venegas VH, Valenzuela JS, Lopez MC, Galdames IC. Palatal rugae: Systematic analysis of its shape and dimensions for use in human identification. Int J Morphol 2009;27:819‑25.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-01

How to Cite

Lakshmana Bathala, Narendra Rachuri, Srinivas Rayapati, & Sudheer Kondaka. (2016). Prosthodontics an “arsenal” in forensic dentistry. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 8(3), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.195102