Role of forensic odontology in the Indian Armed Forces: An unexplored arena

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Karandeep Arora
Prabhpreet Kaur

Abstract

Forensic odontology (FO) is a branch of forensic medicine that in the interest of justice deals with proper handling and examination of dental evidence. Teeth can survive in most conditions encountered at death and during decomposition, even when the body is exposed to extreme forces and/or temperatures. FO is being practiced worldwide since 1775, after which it has not only become an integral part of the judicial system of the developed countries but also been adopted by the armed forces and investigative agencies of these countries. In India, the awareness of FO is gaining pace since the last decade after the establishment of various organizations and the Dental Council of India making it a part of the curriculum. However, its identity as an individual endeavour is still to be established. Awareness and applicability of FO in the Indian Defense Forces would be of great help for better and accurate record keeping of the dedicated and vigilant warriors of our army. These records will be of great help for easy recognition of our army men at the time of calamities, wars, and other difficulties. It would also be useful in the identification of terrorists who enter our country and travel easily in disguise.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Karandeep Arora, & Prabhpreet Kaur. (2016). Role of forensic odontology in the Indian Armed Forces: An unexplored arena. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 8(3), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.195124

References

  1. Taylor DV. Forensic dentistry. J R Army Med Corps 1968;114:80-6. 2. Keiser-Nielsen S. Person Identification by Means of the Teeth. Bristol: John Wright & Sons; 1980. p. 54-72.
  2. Stavrianos C, Petalotis N, Stavrianos I. Identification of human remains by teeth - the previously undiscovered case of William II Villehardouin. Bull Int Assoc Paleodont 2009;3:4-8.
  3. Acharya AB, Kumar KK. Age estimation in Indians from extracted unsectioned teeth. Forensic Sci Int 2011;212:275.e1-5.
  4. Sweet D. Forensic dental identification. Forensic Sci Int 2010;201:3-4.
  5. Leung C. Forensic odontology. Dent Bull 2008;13:16-20. 7. Willems G, Moulin-Romsee C, SolheimT. Non-destructive dentalage calculation methods in adults: Intra- and inter-observer effects. Forensic Sci Int 2002;126:221-6.
  6. Bruce-Chwatt RM. A brief history of forensic odontology since 1775. J Forensic Leg Med 2010;17:127-30.
  7. Kelsey Fry W. The baptist church cellar case. Brit Dent J 1943;75:154.
  8. Luntz LL. History of forensic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1977;21:7-17.
  9. Mann RW. Use of bone trabeculae to establish positive identification. Forensic Sci Int 1998;98:91-9.
  10. Quatrehomme G, Fronty P, Sapanet M, Grévin G, Bailet P, Ollier A. Identification by frontal sinus pattern in forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Int 1996;83:147-53.
  11. Dinakar AD. Forensic odontology: Trends in India. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014;6:1-2.
  12. Acharya AB. A decade of forensic odontology in India. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2:1.
  13. Balachander N, Babu NA, Jimson S, Priyadharsini C, Masthan KM. Evolution of forensic odontology: An overview. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2015;7(Suppl 1):S176-80.
  14. Soomer H, Lincoln MJ, Ranta H, Penttilä A, Leibur E. Dentists’ qualifications affect the accuracy of radiographic identification. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:1121-6.
  15. Keiser-Nielsen S. A six-digit code for computer-aided dental identification. Forensic Sci Int 1983;21:85-9.
  16. Verma AK, Kumar S, Bhattacharya S. Identification of a person with the help of bite mark analysis. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2013;3:88-91.