Cementum as an age determinant: A forensic view

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Godishala Raju
Muddana Keerthi
Surapaneni Nandan
Thokala Rao
Pavan Kulkarni
Dorankula Reddy

Abstract

Context: Forensic age estimation (FAE) defines an expertise in forensic medicine, which aims to define in the most accurate way to determine the unknown chronological age of the person involved in judicial or legal proceedings. Dental cementum is a vital tissue which demonstrates continuous apposition throughout the life of the tooth. This appositional changes of cementum helps in approximation of age inforensic investigations. Aims: To correlate age by measuring the overlap or coronal migration of thecementum at thecementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the thickness of the cementum at the apical third of the root. Settings and Design: A hundred freshly extracted teethfrom patients ranging from ages 17-55were longitudinal buccolingually ground sectioned using a mounted lathe wheel and Arkansas stone. Materials and Methods: 100 freshly extracted teeth of age group ranging from 17-55 years were taken. These teeth were longitudinally ground sectioned to a thickness of 8-10μm using a mounted lathe wheel and Arkansas stone. Afterwards the teeth were examined under a light microscope using a micrometer eyepiece for measuring the overlap or coronal migration of the cementum at the CEJ and the thickness of the cementum at the apical one-third of root. Statistical Analysis: Measurements of the overlap or the coronal migration of the cementum at the CEJ and the thickness of the cementum at the apical one-third of the root are correlated with age. Results: Results of the study indicated that the cementum at the CEJ migrated coronally during theaging process in case of the impacted teeth. There is also a significant increase in the thickness of the cementum at the apical onethird of rootin the case of both the impacted and erupted teeth. Conclusion: Approximation of age by measuring overlap or coronal migration of the cementum at the CEJ and the thickness of the cementum at the apical one-third of the rootsets new alleys in FAE.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Godishala Raju, Muddana Keerthi, Surapaneni Nandan, Thokala Rao, Pavan Kulkarni, & Dorankula Reddy. (2016). Cementum as an age determinant: A forensic view. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 8(3), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.195121

References

  1. Pramod JB, Marya A, Sharma V. Role of forensic odontologist in post mortem person identification. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2012;9:522‑30.
  2. Biggerstaff RH. Forensic dentistry and the human dentition in individual age estimations. Dent Clin North Am 1977;21:167‑74.
  3. Biggerstaff RH. Craniofacial characteristics as determinants of age, sex, and race in forensic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1977; 21:85‑97.
  4. Nitzan DW, Michaeli Y, Weinreb M, Azaz B . The effect of aging on tooth morphology: A study on impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 61:54‑60.
  5. Azaz B, Michaeli Y, Nitzan D. Aging of tissues of the roots of nonfunctional human teeth (impacted canines). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977; 43:572‑8.
  6. Azaz B, Ulmansky M, Moshew R, Sela J. Correlation between age and thickness of cementum in impacted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1974;38:691‑4.
  7. Aukhill I, Petterson E, Suggs C. Periodontal wound healing in the absence of periodontal ligament cells. J Periodontol 1987;58:71‑7.
  8. Nizel AE. The Science of Nutrition and it’s Application in Clinical Dentistry. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1966. p. 281‑7.
  9. Grossman ES, Hargreaves JA. Variable cementoenamel junction in one person. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:93‑7.
  10. NanciA. Ten Cate’s Oral Histology. 8th ed. united states of america Elsevier; 2013. p. 205, 218.
  11. Cunha E, Baccino E, Martrille L, Ramsthaler F, Prieto J, Schuliar Y, et al. The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: A review. Forensic SciInt 2009;193:1‑13.
  12. Pillai PS, Bhaskar GR. Age estimation from the teeth using Gustafson’s method‑a study in India. Forensic Sci 1974;3:135‑41.
  13. Salariya SA, GoreaRK. Age estimation by gustafson’s method and its modifications. J Indo‑Pac Acad of Forensicodont 2010;1:12‑9.
  14. Bocutoğlu O, Yakan B. Coronal displacement of cementum: Correlation between age and coronal movement of cementum in impacted teeth. Aust Dent J 1997;42:185‑8.
  15. Rai B, Dhattarwal SK, Bhardwaj DN, Anand SC. Coronal displacement of cementum in impacted teeth: Age determination. World J Med Sci 2006;1:117‑8.
  16. Sharma AT, Chaudhary M, Thombre V, Tekade SA, Pradhan P, Bagri K. Coronal displacement of cementum in impacted teeth and its correlation to age: A preliminary study. J Ind Acad Oral Med and Radiol 2010;22:190‑2.
  17. Gupta P, Kaur H, Shankari GS, Jawanda MK, Sahi N. Human age estimation from tooth cementum and dentin. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:ZC07‑10.
  18. Zander HA, Hürzeler B. Continuous cementum apposition. J Dent Res 1958;37:1035‑44.
  19. Stein TJ, Corcoran JF. Anatomy of the root apex and its histologic changes with age. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69:238‑42.
  20. Introna F, Campobasso CP. Biological versus legal age of living individual. In: Schmitt A, Cunha E, Pinheiro J, editors. Forensic Anthropology and Medicine. Complementary Sciences from Recovery to Cause of Death. Totowa, New Jersey: Humana Press; 2006.p. 57‑82.
  21. Santoro V, De Donno A, Marrone M, Campobasso CP, Introna F. Forensic age estimation of living individuals: A retrospective analysis. Forensic Sci Int 2009;193:129.e1‑4.
  22. Bedford ME, Russell KF, Lovejoy CO, Meindl RS, Simpson SW, Stuart‑Macadam PL. Test of the multifactorial aging method using skeleton with known age‑at‑death from the Grant collection. Am J Phys Anthropol 1993;91:287‑97.