Demirjian approach of dental age estimation: Abridged for operator ease

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Vanshika Jain
Priyanka Kapoor
Ragini Miglani

Abstract

Background: Present times have seen an alarming increase in incidence of crimes by juveniles and of mass destruction that Highlight the preponderance of individual age estimation. Of the numerous techniques employed for age assessment, dental age estimation (DAE) and its correlation with chronological age (CA) have been of great significance in the recent past. Demirjian system, considered as gold standard in DAE is a simple and convenient method for DAE, though,, although, referring to multiple tables make it cumbersome and less eco friendly due to excessive paper load. Aim: The present study was aimed to develop a comprehensive chart (DAEcc) inclusive of all Demirjian tables and developmental stages of teeth and also to as well as to test the operator ease of 50 undergraduate dental students in performing DAE using this chart. Materials and Methods: The study was performed in two stages, wherein the first stage was aimed at formulation of the comprehensive chart (DAECC) which included pictorial representation of calcification stages, the Federation Dentaire Internationale notation of the teeth, and the corresponding scores for each stage with a concluding column at the end to enter the total score. The second stage assessed the applicability of the ease of DAE by DAECC, whereby fifty 2nd year BDS students were asked to trace the calcification stages of the seven permanent left mandibular teeth on a panorex, identify the correct stage, assign the corresponding score, and to calculate the total score for subsequent dental age assessment. Results and Conclusions: showed that average time taken by the students for tracing seven mandibular teeth was 5 min and for assessment of dental age was 7 min. The total time taken for DAE was approximately 12 min, thus making the procedure less time consuming. Hence, this study proposes the use of DAEcc for age estimation due to ease in comprehension and execution of Demirjian system.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Vanshika Jain, Priyanka Kapoor, & Ragini Miglani. (2016). Demirjian approach of dental age estimation: Abridged for operator ease. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 8(3), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.195103

References

  1. Nicolai A. Age Cheating is a Huge Problem in India: Nicolai. The Times of India; 11 September, 2015. p. 30.
  2. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973;45:211‑27.
  3. DemirjianA, Goldstein H. New systems for dental maturity based on seven and four teeth. Ann Hum Biol 1976;3:411‑21.
  4. Nolla CM. The development of the permanent teeth. J Dent Child 1960;27:254‑66.
  5. Griffin JT, Malan D. Age Determination of Children from Radiographic Analysis of Eight Stages in the Mineralization of the Lower Left Permanent Dentition, Excluding Third Molar. Dissertation for Diploma in Forensic Odontology. London Hospital Medical College; 1987.
  6. Patnana AK, Vabbalareddy RS, V Vanga NR. Evaluating the reliability of three different dental age estimation methods in Visakhapatnam children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7:186‑91.
  7. Mohammed RB, Srinivas B, Sanghvi P, Satyanarayana G, Gopalakrishnan M, Pavani BV. Accuracy of Demirjian’s 8 teeth method for age prediction in South Indian children: A comparative study. Contemp Clin Dent 2015;6:5‑11.
  8. Alshihri AM, Kruger E, Tennant M. Dental age assessment of 4‑16 year old Western Saudi children and adolescents using Demirjian’s method for forensic dentistry. Egypt J Forensic Sci 2015;6:152-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejfs. 2015.03.003. Available from: http:// www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2090536X15000258. [Last accessed on 2015 Oct 26].
  9. Gungor OE, Kale B, Celikoglu M, GungorAY, Sari Z. Validity of the Demirjian method for dental age estimation for Southern Turkish children. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18:616‑9.
  10. Nur B, Kusgoz A, Bayram M, Celikoglu M, Nur M, Kayipmaz S, et al. Validity of Demirjian and Nolla methods for dental age estimation for Northeastern Turkish children aged 5‑16 years old. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17:e871‑7.
  11. Mani SA, Naing L, John J, Samsudin AR. Comparison of two methods of dental age estimation in 7‑15‑year‑old Malays. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18:380‑8.
  12. Chen JW, Guo J, Zhou J, Liu RK, Chen TT, Zou SJ. Assessment of dental maturity of western Chinese children using Demirjian’s method. Forensic Sci Int 2010;197:119.e1‑4.
  13. Nik‑Hussein NN, Kee KM, Gan P. Validity of Demirjian and Willems methods for dental age estimation for Malaysian children aged 5‑15 years old. Forensic Sci Int 2011;204:208.e1‑6.
  14. Hedge RJ, Sood PB. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: Radiographic evaluation of dental age in 6 to 13 years children of Belgaum using Demirjian methods. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2002;20:132‑8. Available from: http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12587748. [Last accessed on 2015 Jul 04].
  15. Sinha S, Umapathy D, Shashikanth MC, Misra N, Mehra A, Singh AK. Dental age estimation by Demirjian’s and Nolla’s method: A comparative study among children attending a dental college in Lucknow (UP). J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol 2014;26:279‑86. Available from: http://www.jiaomr.in/article.asp? issn=0972‑1363;year=2014;volume=26;issue=3;spage=279;epage=2 86;aulast=Sinha. [Last accessed on 2015 Oct 27]

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.