Training module for cheiloscopy and palatoscopy in forensic odontology

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Shally Khanna
Narendra Singh
Veera Brave
Gadiputi Sreedhar
Anupam Purwar
Alok Srivastava

Abstract

Introduction: Studies of lip prints and palatal rugae, dates back to late 19 th and early 20 th centuries and since then, various methods of classification and analysis were introduced, however systematic recording and analysis of data is still need to improve further, to arrive at flawless and meaningful conclusions. Moreover, the awareness among dental personnel regarding the practical knowledge of cheiloscopy and palatoscopy is ambiguous. So, efforts have been made to introduce training module to improve the education of cheiloscopy and palatoscopy for dental students. Aims and Objective: 1. To prepare training module for cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. 2. To assess the efficacy of designed training module. Materials and Methods: Training module was used to train the dental students. Random matching of lip and palatal rugae patterns was carried out by dental students before and after training. Pre- and post-training matched results were then compared. Intraobserver variability assessed by comparing first and second assessment of lip print and palatal rugae patterns. Results: It was inferred statistically that training module had improved the ability to identify individuals based on lip prints and palatal rugae, with insignificant intraobserver variation.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Shally Khanna, Narendra Singh, Veera Brave, Gadiputi Sreedhar, Anupam Purwar, & Alok Srivastava. (2014). Training module for cheiloscopy and palatoscopy in forensic odontology. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 6(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.127768

References

  1. Gondivkar SM, Indurkar A, Degwekar S, Bhowate R. Cheiloscopy for sex determination. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:56‑60.
  2. Vahanwala SP, Parekh BK. Study of lip prints as an aid to forensic methodology. J Indian Dent Assoc 2000;71:16‑9.
  3. Caldas IM, Magalhaes T, Afonso A. Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int 2007;165:1‑9.
  4. Acharya AB. Teaching forensic odontology: AN opinion on its content and format. Eur J Dent Educ 2006;10:137‑41.
  5. Bindal U, Jethani SL, Mehrotra N, Rohtagi RK, Arora M, Sinha P. Lip prints as a method of identification in human being. J Anat Soc India 2009;58:152‑5.
  6. Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathod V. Comaparative reliability of cheiloscopy and palatoscopy in human identification. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:453‑7.
  7. Bansode SC, Kulkarni MM. Importance of palatal rugae in individual identification. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:77‑81.
  8. Augustine J, Barpande SR, Tupukari JV. Cheiloscopy as an adjunct to forensic identification: A study of 600 individuals. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2008;27:44‑52.
  9. Venegas VH, Valenzuela JS, Lopez MC, Galdames IC. Palatal rugae: Systematic analysis of its shape and dimensions for use in human identification. Int J Morphol 2009;27:819‑25.