Digital method for lip print analysis: A New approach

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rachana Prabhu
Ajit Dinkar
Vishnudas Prabhu

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the uniqueness and to define a standard method for the analysis of lip prints. Materials and Methods: Lip prints of 100 students were taken using Scotch tape without any distortion. These prints were then scanned for the digital analysis. Using Adobe Photoshop 7 software an attempt was made to trace each and every line using Suzuki and Tsuchihashi′s classification. Weighted value scoring system was used to check for the uniqueness of the lip prints. Results: No two lip prints had exactly matching scores in all four Quadrants. No statistically significant difference was found in the change of pattern in lip print images collected after 12 months from the same individual. With digital analysis, up to 15 lines were traceable in 66%, 71%, 52% and 51% of Quadrant I, II, III and IV respectively. Conclusion: Lip prints are unique to an individual. The digital method of analyzing lip print images serves better visualization, ease in identification and recording of the lip print pattern. Weighted Value Scoring system can be considered as a standard method for determining the uniqueness of the lip prints.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Rachana Prabhu, Ajit Dinkar, & Vishnudas Prabhu. (2013). Digital method for lip print analysis: A New approach. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 5(2), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.119772

References

  1. Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. A New Attempt of Personal Identification by Means of Lip Print. Canadian Soc Forensic Sci 1971;4:154-58.
  2. Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. New Attempt of Personal Identification by Means of Lip Print. J Indian Dent Assoc 1970;42:8-9.
  3. Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. Personal Identification by Means of Lip Prints. J Forensic Med 1970;17:52-7.
  4. Vahanwala SP, Parekh BK. Study of lip prints as an aid to forensic methodology. J Forensic Med Toxicol 2000;17:12-8.
  5. Sivapathasundharam B, Prakash PA, Sivakumar G. Lip Prints (Cheiloscopy). Indian J Dent Res 2001;12:234-7.
  6. Varghese AJ, Somesekar M, Babu UR. A study on Lip prints types among the people of kerala. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2010;32:6-7
  7. Saraswati TR, Mishra G, Ranganathan K. Study of Lip prints. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:28-31.
  8. Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathod V. Cheiloscopy: The study of lip prints in sex identification. JForensic Dent Sci 2009;1:24-7.
  9. Gondivkar SM, Indurkar A, Degwekar S, Bhowate R. Cheiloscopy for sex determination. JForensic Dent Sci 2009;1:56-60.
  10. Kasprzak J. Possibilities of Cheiloscopy. Forensic SciInt 1990;46: 145-51.
  11. Kasprzak J. Cheiloscopy. In: Encyclopedia of Forensic Sciences. In:Siegal JA, Saukko PJ., Knupfer GC (editors). 2nd edi, Vol I. London: Academic Press, 2000: 358-61.
  12. Prabhu R, Dinkar A, Prabhu V. Collection of Lip prints as forensic evidence at the crime scene – An insight. J Oral Health Res 2010;1:129-35
  13. Tsuchihashi Y. Studies on Personal Identification by Means of Lip Prints. Forensic Sci 1974;3:233-48.
  14. Holt SB. Ridged skin. In: The Genetics of Dermal Ridges. In: Kugelmass N (editors). Springfield, Illinois, U.S.A:Thomas CC. Publisher;.1968. p.5-11.