Rugoscopy: Human identification by computer-assisted photographic superimposition technique

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Dec 1, 2013
https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.119771
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 5, Issue 2, July-December 2013

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Rezwana Mohammed
Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, GITAM Dental College & Hospital, Rushikonda, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh
Rajendra Patil
Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Narayana Dental College & Hospital, Chintareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh
V Pammi
Department of Oral Medicine & Radiology, Narayana Dental College & Hospital, Chintareddypalem, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh
M Sandya
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Mamata Dental College & Hospital, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh
Siva Kalyan
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Mamata Dental College & Hospital, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh
A Anitha
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Mamata Dental College & Hospital, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh

Abstract

Background: Human identification has been studied since fourteenth century and it has gradually advanced for forensic purposes. Traditional methods such as dental, fingerprint, and DNA comparisons are probably the most common techniques used in this context, allowing fast and secure identification processes. But, in circumstances where identification of an individual by fingerprint or dental record comparison is difficult, palatal rugae may be considered as an alternative source of material. Aim: The present study was done to evaluate the individualistic nature and use of palatal rugae patterns for personal identification and also to test the efficiency of computerized software for forensic identification by photographic superimposition of palatal photographs obtained from casts. Materials and Methods: Two sets of Alginate impressions were made from the upper arches of 100 individuals (50 males and 50 females) with one month interval in between and the casts were poured. All the teeth except the incisors were removed to ensure that only the palate could be used in identification process. In one set of the casts, the palatal rugae were highlighted with a graphite pencil. All the 200 casts were randomly numbered, and then, they were photographed with a 10.1 Mega Pixel Kodak digital camera using standardized method. Using computerized software, the digital photographs of the models without highlighting the palatal rugae were overlapped over the images (transparent) of the palatal rugae with highlighted palatal rugae, in order to identify the pairs by superimposition technique. Incisors were remained and used as landmarks to determine the magnification required to bring the two set of photographs to the same size, in order to make perfect superimposition of images. Results: The result of the overlapping of the digital photographs of highlighted palatal rugae over normal set of models without highlighted palatal rugae resulted in 100% positive identification. Conclusion: This study showed that utilization of palatal photographs is highly viable. The photographic superimposition technique using Adobe Photoshop 8.0 software (used in this study for comparison of palatal rugae) was proved effective for human identification and can be used when ante-mortem data regarding palatal rugae is provided. This study also concluded that palatal rugae are highly individualistic and play an important role as a complementary method in personal identification.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Rezwana Mohammed, Rajendra Patil, V Pammi, M Sandya, Siva Kalyan, & A Anitha. (2013). Rugoscopy: Human identification by computer-assisted photographic superimposition technique. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 5(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.119771
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Filho EM, Helena SP, Arsenio SP, Suzana MC. Palatal rugae patterns as bio indicators of identification in forensic Dentistry. RFO 2009;14:227‑33.
  2. Angelis D, Cattaneo C, Grandi M. Dental superimposition: A pilot study for standardising the method. Int J Legal Med 2007;121:501‑6.
  3. Lortan L, Rethman M, Friedman R. The computer assisted post mortem identification (CAPMI): A computer based identification program. J Forensic Sci 1988;33:977‑84.
  4. Caldas IM, Magalhaes T, Afonso A. Establishing identity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int 2007;165:1‑9.
  5. Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathod V. Comparative reliability of cheiloscopy and palatoscopy in human identification. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20:453‑7.
  6. Hauser G, Daponte A, Roberts M.J. Palatal rugae. J Anat 1989;165:237‑49.
  7. Aparna P, SangeetaW, Rajkumar P. Palatal rugoscopy: Establishing identity. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;2:27‑31.
  8. Patil MS, Patil SB, AcharyaAB. Palatine rugae and their significance in clinical dentistry: A review of the literature. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1471‑8.
  9. Virdi M, Singh Y, Kumar A. Role of Palatal Rugae in Forensic Identification of the Pediatric Population. Internet J Forensic Sci 2010. p. 4.
  10. Hemanth M, Vidya M, Prasad N, Bhavana KV. Identification of individuals using palatal rugae: Computerized method. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2:86‑90.
  11. Kavita B, Einstein A, Sivapathasundaram B, Saraswati TR. Limitations in forensic odontology. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:8‑10.
  12. Bansode S, Kulkarni M. Importance of palatal rugae in individual identification. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:7‑10.
  13. Limson KS, Julian R. Computerized recording of the palatal rugae pattern and an evaluation of its application in forensic identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2004;22:1‑4.
  14. Santos KC, Fernandes MS, Monica DS. Evaluation of a digital methodology for human identification using palatal rugoscopy. Brazilian J Oral Sci 2011;10:199‑203.
  15. English WR, Robison SF, Summitt JB, Oesterle LJ, Brannon RB, Morlang WM. Individuality of human palatal rugae. J Forensic Sci 1988;33:718‑26.
  16. Glaister J, Brash JC. Medico‑legal aspects of the Ruxton case. Baltimore: William Wood and Co; 1937.
  17. Kogon SL, Ling SC. A New technique for palatal rugae comparison in forensic odontology. Canadian Soc Forensic Sci J 1973;6:3‑10.
  18. Bowers CM, Johansen RJ. Digital Imaging methods as an aid in dental identification of human remains. J Forensic Sci 2002;47:354‑9.
  19. Pueyo VM, Garrido BR, Sanchez JA. Odontologialegal. Forense, Masson, Barcelona: 1994. p. 277‑92.
  20. Allen H. The palatal rugae in man. Dental Cosmos 1889;31:66‑80.
  21. Sassouni V. Palatoprint and roentgenographic cephalometry as new method in Human identification. J Forensic Sci 1957;2:428‑42.
  22. Ubelakar DH, Bubniak E, O’Donnell G. Computer assisted photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 1992;37:750‑62.
  23. Ohtani M, Nishida N, Chiba T, Fukuda M, Miyamoto Y, Yoshioka N. Indication and limitation of using palatal rugae for personal identification in edentulous cases. J Forensic Sci Int 2008;176:178‑82.
  24. Hemanth M, Vidya M, Prasad N, Karkera BV. Human identification using palatal rugae: Manual method. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2009;3:26‑8.
  25. Thomas CJ, Van Wyk CW. The palatal rugae in an identification. J Forensic Odontostomataol 1988;6:21‑7.