Estimation of age by Kvaal′s technique in sample Indian population to establish the need for local Indian-based formulae

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Shruthi Patil
K Mohankumar
Mandana Donoghue

Abstract

Context: Age estimation using radiographs by Kvaal and coauthors has shown to be reliable method, possible variation in ethnicity restricts its use in sample Indian population. Aims: Thus this study was aimed at evaluating the accuracy of age estimation formula of Kvaal and coauthors developed for Norwegian population. Materials and Methods: From the subjects (1-100) between the age group 20 and 50 years digitized intraoral periapical (IOPA) radiograph of maxillary central incisors was taken and length and width of the teeth were measured and their ratios were calculated and applied to Kvaal and coauthors formula. The estimated age and chronological age were compared, less accurate results were found in sample Indian population. Modified Kvaal′s formula was then developed by using regression analysis of the ratios and to evaluate the accuracy of this formula, the study was repeated using same criteria and methodology on another subjects (101-200). Results: Using Kvaal′s formula standard error of estimated age was more in sample Indian population when compared with Norwegian population. Then modified Kvaal′s formula was developed and applied to sample Indian population, which showed accurate results. Conclusion: This study concludes that formula which was derived from Norwegian population is not applicable to sample Indian population.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Shruthi Patil, K Mohankumar, & Mandana Donoghue. (2014). Estimation of age by Kvaal′s technique in sample Indian population to establish the need for local Indian-based formulae. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 6(3), 166–170. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.137050

References

  1. Stavrianos ch, Mastagas D, Stavrianou I, Karaiskou O. Dental age estimation of adults: A review of methods and principals. Res J Med Sci 2008;2:258‑68.
  2. Vandevoort FM, Bergmans L, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Bielen DJ, Lambrechts P, Wevers M, et al. Age Calculation Using X‑ray Microfocus Computed Tomographical Scanning of Teeth: A Pilot Study. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:787‑90.
  3. Meinl A, Huber CD, Tangl S, Gruber GM, Teschler‑Nicola M, Watzek G. Comparison of the validity of three dental methods for the estimation of age at death. Forensic Sci Int 2008;178:96‑105.
  4. Reppien K, Sejrsen B, Lynnerup N. Evaluation of post‑mortem estimated dental age versus real age: A retrospective 21‑year survey. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159S: S84‑8.
  5. Paewinsky E, Pfeiffer H, Brinkmann B. Quantification of secondary dentine formation from orthopantomograms: A contribution to forensic age estimation methods in adults. Int J Legal Med 2005;119:27‑30.
  6. Babshet M, Acharya AB, Naikmasur VG. Age estimation in Indians from pulp/tooth area ratio of mandibular canines. Forensic Sci Int 2010;179:125.e1‑4.
  7. Kvaal SI, Kolltveit KM, Thomsen IO, Solheim T. Age estimation of adults from dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 1995;74:175‑85.
  8. Azrak B, Victor A, Willershausen B, Pistorius A, Hörr C, Gleissner C. Usefulness of combining clinical and radiological dental findings for a more accurate noninvasive age estimation. J Forensic Sci 2007;52:146‑50.
  9. Bosmansa N, Ann P, Aly M, Willems G. The application of Kvaal’s dental age calculation technique on panoramic dental radiographs. Forensic Sci Int 2005;153:208‑12.
  10. Patil K, Mahima VG, Malleshi NS. Maxillary lateral incisor as biomarker of age – An in vivo radiographic study. Indian J Forensic Odontol 2009;2:17‑20.
  11. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Belcastro MG, Bonfiglioli B, Rastelli E, Cingolani M. Age estimation by pulp/tooth ratio in canines by mesial and vestibular peri‑apical X‑ rays. J Forensic sci 2007;52:1151‑5.