Digital approach for measuring dentin translucency in forensic age estimation

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 1, 2013
https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.114558
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 5, Issue 1, January-June 2013

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Simranjit Singh
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry
Ramesh Venkatapathy
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry
P Balamurali
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry
NSC Charles
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry
R Suganya
Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry

Abstract

Background: Dentin translucency is best suited for age estimation not only in terms of accuracy but also in terms of simplicity. Conventionally, translucency has been measured using calipers. Computer-based methods have been proposed for the same, although these required the use of custom-built software programs. Objectives: The objectives of the study were to use a simple digital method to measure dentinal translucency on sectioned teeth and to compare digital measurements to conventionally obtained translucency measurements. Materials and Methods: Fifty extracted permanent teeth were collected and were sectioned to 250 μm. Translucency measurements were obtained using the digital method and compared with those obtained using a caliper. Results: Correlation coefficients of translucency measurements to age were statistically significant for both methods (P < 0.001), and marginally higher for the conventional approach (r = 0.4671). Application of derived linear regression equations on an independent sample (n = 10) revealed a similar ability of both the methods to assess age to within ±5 years of the actual age. Conclusion: The translucency measurements obtained by the two methods were very similar, with no clear superiority of one method over the other. Hence, further studies on a large scale are warranted to determine which method is more reliable to estimate the age.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Simranjit Singh, Ramesh Venkatapathy, P Balamurali, NSC Charles, & R Suganya. (2013). Digital approach for measuring dentin translucency in forensic age estimation. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 5(1), 47–51. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.114558
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Willems G. A review of the most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2001;19:9-17.
  2. Acharya AB, Sivapathasundharam B. Forensic Odontology. In: Rajendran R, Sivapathasundharam B, editors. Shafer’s Textbook of Oral Pathology. 6th ed. Noida, India: Elsevier; 2009. p. 871-99.
  3. Vasiliadis L, Stavrianos C, Dagkalis P, Parisi KS, Stavrianou I, Tatsis D. Translucent root dentine in relationship to increasing age: Review of the literature. Res J Biol Sci 2011;6:92-5.
  4. Acharya AB. A new digital approach for measuring dentin translucency in forensic age estimation. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2010;31:133-7.
  5. Harris FE, Mincer HH, Anderson MK, Senn RD. Age estimation from oral and dental structures. In: Senn RD, Stimson GP, editors. Forensic dentistry. New York: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, LLC; 2010. p. 285.
  6. Gustafson G. Age determination on teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1950;41:45-54.
  7. Johanson G. Age determination from teeth. Odontologisk Revy 1971;22:90.
  8. Bang G, Ramm E. Determination of age in humans from root dentine transparency. Acta Odontol Scand 1970;28:3-35.
  9. Lamendin H, Baccino E, Humbert JF, Tavernier JC, Nossintchouk RM, Zerilli A. A simple technique for age estimation in adult corpses: The two criteria dental method. J Forensic Sci 1992;37:1373-9.
  10. Drusini A, Calliari I, Volpe A. Root dentine transparency: Age determination of human teeth using computerized densitometric analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 1991;85:25-30.
  11. Mandojana JM, Martin-de las Heras S, Valenzuela A, Valenzuela M, Luna JD. Differences in morphological age-related dental changes depending on postmortem interval. J Forensic Sci 2001;46:889-92.
  12. Johansen RJ, Bowers CM. Digital analysis of bite mark evidence using adobe photoshop. Santa Barbara, CA: Forensic Imaging Services; 2000.
  13. Vasiliadis L. Root dentine translucency. Ph.D. Thesis, Bristol University, UK, 1981.
  14. Miles AE. Sans teeth: Changes in oral tissues with advancing age. Proc R Soc Med 1972;65:801-6.
  15. Miles AE. Age changes in dental tissues. In: Cohen B, Kramer IR, editors. Scientific foundations of dentistry. Vol. 29. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd.; 1976. p. 363-75.
  16. Johnson CC. Transparent dentine in age estimation. Oral Surg 1968;25:834-8.
  17. Miles AE. Dentition in the estimation of age. J Dent Res 1963;42:255-63.
  18. Singhal A, Ramesh V, Balamurali PD. A Comparative analysis of root dentin translucency with known age. J Foernsic Dent Sci 2010;2:18-21.
  19. Nalabandian J, Gonzales F, Sognnaes RF. Sclerotic age changes in root dentin of human teeth as observed by optical, electron and X-ray microscopy. J Dent Res 1960;39:598-607.
  20. Azaz B, Michaeli Y, Nitzan D. Aging tissues of the roots of nonfunctional human teeth (Impacted Canines). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1977;43:572-8.
  21. Solheim T. Dental root translucency as an indicator of age. Scand J Dent Res 1989;97:189-97.
  22. Valenzuela A, Martin-De Las Heras S, Mandojana JM, De Dios Luna J, Valenzuela M, Villanueva E. Multiple regression models for age estimation by assessment of morphologic dental changes according to teeth source. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2002;23: 386-9.