Practical aspects of DNA-based forensic studies in dentistry

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

J Muruganandhan
G Sivakumar

Abstract

Forensic dentistry as a science has evolved from simple methods of age estimation and bite-mark analysis, to a new era of genetic and serological investigations. DNA analysis in forensic science requires a sample or source from either an individual (living or dead) or a crime/incident site. The orofacial region is a good source of such material, due to the fact that certain oral tissues are relatively resistant to environmental degradation and destruction by thermal, electrical, and mechanical insult. Dentists may be called upon to provide samples and expert analysis in many such situations. Sources include soft and hard tissues of teeth and jaws, saliva, biopsy material, and mucosal swabs. Tissue samples should be handled with care, and correct protocol in collection and preparation has to be followed. This ensures a high yield of the required DNA. Hard tissues like teeth require specialized procedures to extract the genetic material. Research has shown that there is a wide variation in the quality and quantity of DNA extracted from different individuals from the same site even under similar conditions. This necessitates calibration of the various methods to achieve best results. DNA analysis can provide highly accurate identification if used correctly. Here a description of the various sources in the oral region has been provided from which samples could be forwarded to the forensic laboratory. Most commonly employed techniques of collection and handling for laboratory procedures have been outlined.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
J Muruganandhan, & G Sivakumar. (2011). Practical aspects of DNA-based forensic studies in dentistry. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 3(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.85295

References

  1. Smith BC, Holland MM, Sweet D, DiZinno JA. DNA and the forensic odontologist. In: Bowers CM, Bell GL, editors. Manual of forensic odontology. 3rd ed. Colorado Springs: American society of forensic odontology; 1997. p. 283-98.
  2. Fourney RM. Forensic reality and the practical experience of DNA typing update. Article provided to the international society for the reform of criminal law 2002. National DNA data bank of Canada, Forensic Laboratory Services. Available from: http://www.isrcl. org/Papers/Fourney.pdf. [cited in 2002].
  3. Leung KK. Forensic Odontology. Dent Bull Hong Kong Med Diary 2008;13:16-20.
  4. Silva RH, Peres AS, Oliveira RN, Oliveira FT, Sales-Peres SH. Use of DNA technology in forensic dentistry. J App Oral Sci 2007;15:156-61.
  5. Sweet DJ, Hildebrand DP. Recovery of DNA from human teeth by cryogenic grinding. J Forensic Sci 1998;43:1199-202.
  6. Preseki A, Brkic H, Primorac D, Drmick I. Methods of preparing the tooth for DNA isolation. Acta Stomatol Croat 2000;34:21-4.
  7. Silva LAF, Passos NS. DNA forense: Coleta de amostras biolicas em locais de crime para estudo do DNA. Macei Ed UFAL; 2002.
  8. Mitsouras K, Faulhaber EA. Saliva as an alternative source of high yield canine genomic DNA for genotyping studies. BMC Res Notes 2009;2:219.
  9. Daniel PK, David K, Serena GL, Vivian N, Qiuyun F. Effect of storage conditions on the extraction of PCR-quality genomic DNA from saliva. Clin Chem Acta 2004;343:191-9.
  10. Beckett SM, Laughton SJ, Pozza LD, McCowage GB, Marshall G, Cohn RJ, et al. Buccal swabs and treated cards: Methodological considerations for molecular epidemiologic studies examining pediatric populations. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1260-7.
  11. Closas MG, Egan KM, Abruzzo J, Newcomb PA, Ernstoff LT, Franklin T, et al. Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:687-96.
  12. Burger MF, Song EY, Schumm JW. Buccal DNA samples for DNA typing: New collection and processing methods. BioTech 2005;39:257-66.
  13. Sweet D, Lorente M, Lorente JA, Valenzuela A, Villanueva E. An improved method to recover saliva from human skin: the double swab technique. J Forensic Sci 1997;42:320-2.
  14. Kanto A, Hirata MH, Hirata RD, Nunes FD, Melani RFH, Oliveira RN. DNA extraction from human saliva deposited on skin and its use in forensic identification procedures. Braz Oral Res 2005;19:216-22.
  15. Silva RHA, Musse JO, Francisco RH. Melani RF, Oliveira RN. Human bite mark identification and DNA technology in forensic dentistry. Braz J Oral Sci 2006;5:1193-7.
  16. Ellis MA, Song F, Parks ET, Eckert GJ, Dean JA, Windsor LJ. An evaluation of DNA yield, DNA quality and bite registration from a dental impression wafer. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138:1234-40.
  17. Hochmeister MN, Rudin O, Ambach E. PCR analysis from cigarette butts, postage stamps, envelope sealing flaps, and other saliva stained material. In: Lincoln PJ, Thomson J, editors. Forensic DNA profiling protocols. Methods in molecular biology. Totowa: Humana Press; 1998. p. 27-32.
  18. Polymerase Chain Reaction. Available from: http://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/projects/ genome/probe/doc/TechPCR.shtml. [cited in 2010].
  19. Fregeau CJ, Fourney RM. Update to: DNA typing with fluorescently tagged short tandem repeats: A sensitive and accurate approach to human identification. In: Burczak JD, Mardis E, editors. Polymophism Detection Analysis, Biotechniques Books, Update Series. Natick, MA: Eaton Publishing; 2000. p. 149-92.
  20. Moretti TR, Baumstark AL, Defenbaugh DA, Keys KM, Smerick JB, Budowle BJ. Validation of STRs for forensic usage: Performance testing of fluorescent multiplex STR systems and analysis of authentic and simulated forensic samples. Forensic Sci 2001;46:647-60.
  21. Kobayashi K, Hecker KH. Gender determination by amelogenin specific PCR and product analysis by DNA chromatography. Application note 113; Transgenomic Inc (Internet). Available from: http://www.transgenomic.com/pdf/AN113.pdf. [cited in 2010].
  22. Anwar N, Goodman M, Hulme P, Elsmor P, Greenhalgh M, McKeown B. Amelogenin as a target for real time PCR quantitation of forensic templates. Int Cong Ser 2006;1288:768-70.
  23. Kao LG,Tsai LC, Lee JC, Hsieh HM. Controversial cases of human gender identification by amelogenin test. Forensic Sci J 2007;6:69-71.
  24. Steinlechner M, Berger B, Niederstatter H, Parson W. Rare failures in the amelogenin sex test. Int J Legal Med 2002;116:117-20.
  25. George R, Sriram G, Saraswathi TR, Sivapathasundharam B. Isolation of epithelial cells from acrylic removable dentures and gender identification by amplification of SRY gene using real time PCR. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2:326.
  26. Das N, Gorea RK, Gargi J, Singh JR. Sex determination from pulpal tissue. J Indian Forensic Med 2004;26:50. 27. Mishra A. Recent trends used in medical forensic science and Indian law. Available from: http://www.lawyersclubindia.com/ articles/recent-trends-used-in-medical-forensic-science-indian law-2701. [cited in 2010].
  27. Sweet D, Sweet CHW. DNA analysis of dental pulp to link incinerated remains of homicide victim to crime scene. J Forensic Sci 1995;40:310-4.
  28. DNA from cigarette butt man discarded while being questioned in another matter leads to rape charge. Available from: http://www. sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/12/17/state/n064941S87. [cited in 2010].
  29. Press Trust of India. Indian Army to begin DNA profiling of troops. Available from: ibnlive.in.com/news/indian-army-to-begin-dnaprofiling-of-troops. [cited in 2010].
  30. Hampl JA. American Board of Forensic Odontology. Diplomates Reference Manual. Article II: Code of Ethics and Conduct. 2010. p. 20-4. Available from: www.abfo.org. [cited in 2010].
  31. Abichandani RK. New biology and criminal investigation (with a schedule of model DNA legislation proposed). No:18: Forensic Report. 2010. p. 50. Available from: http://gujarathighcourt.nic.in/Articles/NBCI.pdf. [cited in 2010].