Reliability of age estimation using Demirjian′s 8 teeth method and India specific formula

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

V Jayanth Kumar
K Saraswathi Gopal

Abstract

Introduction: The estimation of the age of a person has been an archaic exercise, and since decades even dentists have contributed to this science with several methods through radiography. The tooth with its developmental stages provides us with a non-invasive modality to determine the age of the person. Aim: To evaluate the reliability of age estimation using Demirjian′s 8 teeth method following the French maturity scores and India specific formula. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 121 archived digital orthopantamographs which were predominantly pre-treatment orthodontic radiographs from patients without any obvious developmental anomalies. The radiographs were divided into two gender specific groups and further sub-divided into two smaller groups of 7-16 years and 16.1-23 years. The radiographs were evaluated as per Demirjian′s criteria and age was calculated using the formula developed for the Indian population. Results: The results showed that the mean absolute error for the study sample was 1.18 years; in 57.9% of cases the error rate was within ±1 year. The mean absolute error in males (7-16 years) was 1.2 years; in males (16.1-23 years) was 1.3 years; in females (7-16 years) was 0.95 years and in females (16.1-23 years) was 1.16 years. Conclusion: The age estimation using this method narrows down the error rate to just over one year making this method reliable. However the inclusion of third molar increases the error rates in the older individuals within the sample.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
V Jayanth Kumar, & K Saraswathi Gopal. (2011). Reliability of age estimation using Demirjian′s 8 teeth method and India specific formula. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 3(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.85289

References

  1. Willems G, Moulin-Romsee C, Solheim T. Non-destructive dentalage calculation methods in adults: Intra and inter observer effects. Forensic Sci Int 2002;126:221-6.
  2. Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM. A new system of dental age assessment. Hum Biol 1973;45:211-27.
  3. Acharya AB. Age estimation in Indians using Demirjian’s 8-teeth method. J Forensic sci 2011;56:124-7.
  4. Chaillet N, Demirjian A. Dental maturity in South France: A comparison between Demirjian’s method and polynomial functions. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:1059-66.
  5. Solari AC, Abramovitch K. The accuracy of age and precision of third molar development as an indicator of chronologic age in Hispanics. J Forensic Sci 2002;47:531-5.
  6. Arany S, Lino M, Yoshioka N. Radiographic survey of third molar development in relation to chronologic age among Japanese juveniles. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:534-8.
  7. Reddy KSN. The essential of forensic medicine andtoxicology. 3rd ed. Hyderabad: K Suguna Devi publication; 2009.p.73-4.
  8. Soomer H, Ranta H, Lincoln MJ, Pentillä A, Leibur E. Reliability and validity of eight dental age estimation methods of adults. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:149-52.
  9. Sherrer B. Biostastique. In: Morin G, editor. Montrea: Quebec publishers; 1984.
  10. Koshy S, Tandon S. Dental age assessment: the applicability of the assessment in south Indian children. Forensic SciInt 1998;94:73-85.
  11. Teivens A, Mörnstad H. A modification of the Demirjian method for age estimation in children. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2001;19:26-30.
  12. Ash M, Nelson SJ. Wheeler’s dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion. 8th ed. London: W B Saunders company Ltd; 2006. p. 316.
  13. Mincer HH, Harris EF, Berryman HE. The ABFO study of third molar development and its use as an estimator of chronological age. J Forensic Sci 1993;38:379-90.