Patterns - "A crime solver"

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

A Nagasupriya
Raghu Dhanapal
K Reena
T Saraswathi
C Ramachandran

Abstract

Objective: This study is intended to analyze the predominant pattern of lip and finger prints in males and females and to correlate lip print and finger print for gender identity. Materials and Methods: The study sample comprised of 200 students of Vishnu Dental College, Bhimavaram, Andhra Pradesh, 100 males and 100 females aged between 18 to 27 years. Brown/pink colored lip stick was applied on the lips and the subject was asked to spread it uniformly over the lips. Lip prints were traced in the normal rest position of the lips with the help of cellophane tape. The imprint of the left thumb was taken on a white chart sheet and visualized using magnifying lens. While three main types of finger prints are identified, the classification of lip prints is simplified into branched, reticular, and vertical types. Association between lip prints and finger prints was statistically tested using Chi-square test. Results: This study showed that lip and finger patterns did not reveal statistically significant results within the gender. The correlation between lip and finger patterns for gender identification, was statistically significant. In males, branched type of lip pattern associated with arch, loop, and whorl type of finger pattern was most significant. In females, vertical lip pattern associated with arch finger pattern and reticular lip pattern associated with whorl finger patterns were most significant. Conclusion: We conclude that a correlative study between the lip print and finger print will be very useful in forensic science for gender identification.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
A Nagasupriya, Raghu Dhanapal, K Reena, T Saraswathi, & C Ramachandran. (2011). Patterns - "A crime solver". Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 3(1), 03–07. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.85282

References

  1. Shafer, Hine, Levy. Shafer's text book of oral pathology, 6th ed. Noida, India: Elsevier; 2009. p. 871-97.
  2. Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. A new attempt of personal identification by means of lip print. J Indian Dent Assoc1970;42:8-9.
  3. Gyula G. A short history and some results of the dermatoglyphic studies in Hungary. Acta Biol Szeged 2000;44:135-8.
  4. Kucken M, Newell AC. Finger print formation. J Theor Biol 2005;235:71-83.
  5. Santos M. Queiloscopy: A supplementary stomatological means of identification. Int Microform J Leg Med 1967;2:P.64-68.
  6. Saraswathi TR, Mishra G, Ranganathan K. Study of lip prints. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:28-31.
  7. Kavitha B, Einstein A, Sivapathasundharam B, Saraswathi TR. Limitations in forensic odontology. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:8-10. 8. Alvarez Segui M, Miquel Feucht M, Castello Ponce A, Verdu Pascual F. Persistent lipsticks and their lip prints: new hidden evidence at the crime scene. Forensic Sci Int 2000;112:41-7.
  8. Ball J. The current status of lip prints and their use for identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2002;20:43-6.
  9. Sivapathasundharam B, Ajayprakash P, Sivakumar G. Lip prints (cheiloscopy). Indian J Dent Res 2001;12:234-7.
  10. Lawrence OG, Veridicom I, Chatham NJ. Finger print verification. 3rd ed. California Elsevier; 1998. p. 1-23.
  11. Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathod V. Cheiloscopy: The study of lip prints in sex identification. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:24-7.
  12. Gondivkar SM, Indurkar A, Degwekar S, Bhowate R. Cheiloscopy for sex determination. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:56-60