Under the lens: Dental expert witnesses in Brazil, Croatia, Indonesia, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and the United Kingdom

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ivana Čuković Bagić
Emilio Nuzzolese
Scheila Manica
Sakher AlQahtani
Evi Untoro
John Rosie

Abstract

The dentists' main job is to restore health and function to the oral cavity. However, dental professionals can also be involved in medico legal activities as forensic odontologists or by being Expert Witnesses (EW) to testify in professional liability cases, car accidents and work-related injuries. When called to act as an expert witness by the Court, the appointed dentist has to combine both biological and technical knowledge with equivalent medico-legal and forensic knowledge. Spontaneous involvement in medico-legal matters without an adequate training and experience can lead to mistakes with irreversible consequences. As an expert witness, the dentist has precise responsibility with civil and/or penal consequences, depending on the national judicial system. Dental Expert Witness, working either privately or appointed by the Court, has defined responsibilities and is subjected to civil or criminal proceedings (depending on the judicial system) if found wanting. Keeping in mind that there are significant differences regarding the requirements of becoming eligible to be a Dental Expert Witness in different legal systems. In this work the authors investigated the Judicial Systems regarding the appointment of Dental Expert Witnesses in Brazil, Croatia, Indonesia, Italy, Saudi Arabia and the United Kingdom (Table 1), in order to marshal knowledge towards harmonization and the attainment of best practice. This premise acknowledges the fact that forensic odontology must encompass the necessity for robust systems of audit and accreditation for it to be accepted as an “evidence based” forensic discipline.Further steps to ensure quality assurance in legal dentistry and forensic odontology training should be considered to prevent the spontaneous involvement of inappropriately trained dentists to become involved in making decisions that are beyond their competence and expertise.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Ivana Čuković Bagić, Emilio Nuzzolese, Scheila Manica, Sakher AlQahtani, Evi Untoro, & John Rosie. (2018). Under the lens: Dental expert witnesses in Brazil, Croatia, Indonesia, Italy, Saudi Arabia, and the United Kingdom. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 10(1), 08–17. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_104_17

References

  1. Nuzzolese E, Čuković‑Bagić I. Expert witnesses in dentistry: A comparison between Italy and Croatia. Forensic Odontostomatol 2012; Nov 30; 30 Suppl 1:29‑39. Available from: http://www. iofos.eu/Journals/JFOS%20sup1_Nov12/IDEALS%204‑97.pdf. [Last accessed on 2013 May 01].
  2. De Leo D, Montagna F. La responsabilità del consulente tecnico. In: Montagna F, De Leo D, Carli OP, editors. La Responsabilità Nella Professione Odontoiatrica. ANDI Verona, Ed. Promoass; 1999. p. 309‑13.
  3. Nuzzolese E, Montagna F, Di Nunno N, De Leo D. The medicolegal consultation and the responsibility of the dentist expert / CTU odontoiatra. Minerva Med Leg 2011 September;131(3):67‑73.
  4. Wood PR. Law and practice of international finance. Principles of International Insolvency. 2nd ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2007.
  5. Bryan AG. A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage. 2nd Revised ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. p. 177.
  6. Garner BA. Black’s Law Dictionary‑Common Law. 10th ed. Eagan, Minnesota: Thompson West;2014. p. 334, 2.
  7. Bryan AG. A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage. 2nd Revised ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
  8. Arnold‑Baker C. The Companion to British History, S.V. “English Law”. London: Loncross Denholm Press; 2008. p. 484.
  9. Fromont M. Grands Systèmes de Droit Étrangers. 4th ed. Paris: Dalloz; 2001. p. 8.
  10. Gamal Moursi B. “Islamic Law: Its Relation to Other Legal Systems”. (The American Journal of Comparative Law. Vol. 26. Salt Lake City, Utah: Proceedings of an International Conference on Comparative Law (Spring 1978); 1977. p. 24‑5, 187‑98, 196‑8.
  11. John AM. The Islamic Origins of the Common Law. North Carol Law Rev 1999;77:1635‑739.
  12. Fundamental Law of Vatican City State, Art. 1 §1. Availablefrom:https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmXoypizj W3WknFiJnKLwHCnL72vedxjQkDDP1mXWo6uco/wiki/ Fundamental_Law_of_Vatican_City_State.html. [Last accessed on 2018 Jan 30].
  13. Barzilai G. Law and Religion. Burlington: Ashgate; 2007. Available from: http://law.haifa.ac.il/images/documents/ Law%20and%20 Religion_intro.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Jan 30].
  14. Mahmoud AE. Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 16. Available from: http://iugc.yolasite.com/resources/Reference%20Book%20 04%20‑%20Islamic%20finance,%20law%20economics%20 and%20practice,%20M.%20El%20Gamal.pdf. [Last accessed on 2018 Jan 30].
  15. Brasil. Lei Federal n° 5.081, de 24 de Agosto de 1966. Regula o Exercício da Odontologia. Legislação Federal. Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l5081.htm. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 16; Last updated on 2012 Jul 08].
  16. Brasil. Resolução CFO‑185/93, de 26 de abril de 1993. Aprova a Consolidação das Normas para Procedimentos nos Conselhos de Odontologia e revoga a Resolução CFO‑155/84. Available from: http://www.croba.org.br/documentacao/RESOLUCAO_ CFO_185_93.pdf; http://www.cfo.org.br. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 16; Last updated on 2012 Jul 08].
  17. Silva M. Da. Compêndio de Odontologia Legal. São Paulo: Medsi Editora; 1997. p. 490.
  18. Couto RC. Perícias em Medicina and Odontologia Legal. Rio de Janeiro: MedBook; 2011. p. 680.
  19. Brasil. Código de Processo Penal. Decreto‑Lei N 3.689, de 3 de outubro de 194. Disposições Gerais do Exame do Corpo de Delito, e das Perícias em geral. Available from: http://www.planalto.gov. br/ccivil_03/decreto‑lei/del3689compilado.htm. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 16; Last updated on 2012 Jul 08].
  20. Croatian Association of Court Expert Witnesses‑pravilnik o stalnim sudskim vještacima. Available from: http://www.sudski‑vjestaci. hr/clanci/aktualno/pravilnik‑o‑stalnim‑sudskimvjestacima/ pravilnik‑o‑stalnim‑sudskim‑vjestacima‑37.html. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 19; Last updated on 2012 Jul 08].
  21. Croatian Association of Court Expert Witnesses-pravilnik o Izmjenama i Dopunama Pravilnika o Stalnim Sudskim vještacima. Available from: http://www.sudskivjestaci.hr/clanci/aktualno/ pravilnik-o-stalnim-sudskim-vjestacima/pravilnik-o-izmjenamai- dopunama-pravilnika-o-stalnimsudskim-vjestacima-49.html. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 19; Last updated on 2012 Jul 08].
  22. Hrvatska Komora Dentalne Medicine‑Pravilnik o Načinu Obavljanja Stručne Obuke Kandidata za Stalnog Sudskog Vještaka. Available from: http://www.hkdm.hr/?page=akti‑pravilnik8. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 19; Last updated on 2012 Jul 08].
  23. Act No. 29. Indonesian Medical Practice; 2004. Available from: http://www.inamc.or.id/download/UU%20NO%2029.rtf. [Last accessed on 2013 Apr 30; Last updated on 2004 Nov 03].
  24. Act No. 20, 2003 on Education National System. Available from: http://www.archive.we.dikti.go.id. [Last accessed on 2013 Apr 30; Last updated on 2003 Nov 24].
  25. Act No. 14. The Rule of Police Headquarter about Management of Investigation on Criminal Act; 2012. p. 2, 3, 6, 31‑2. Available from: http://www.ebookbrowse.com. [Last accessed on 2013 Apr 30; Last updated on 2012 Jun 25].
  26. Act No. 8. The Indonesian Law of Criminal Procedure. Ratified in Jakarta; 1981. p. 4, 18‑9, 24‑6, 28, 32‑3, 35‑7. Available from: http://www.defensewiki.ibj.org/images/6/62/Indonesia_Law_ of_Criminal_Procedure.pdf. [Last accessed on 2013 Apr 30; Last updated on 2012 Jun 25].
  27. Indonesian Association of Forensic Sciences, Ethics on Expert Witness in Indonesia. Available from: http://www.aifi.or.id/ kode‑etik.[Last accessed on 2013 Apr 30; Last updated on 2012 Jun 25].
  28. Rossetti M. Il CTU. Milano: Giuffrè Ed; 2006. p. 43.
  29. Medical Ethical Code 2006‑Codice di Deontologia Medica; 2006. Available from: http://www.fnomceo.it/fnomceo/Codice+di+D eontologia+Medica+2006.html?t=a&id=3694 [Last accessed on 2013 May 04; Last updated on 2006 Dec 16].
  30. Law of Criminal Procedures, Royal Decree No. (M/39) 28 Rajab 1422 [16°CT 2001] Umm al‑Qura No. (3867) 17 sha’ban 1422. Available from: http://www.saudiembassy.net/about/ country‑information/laws/CriminalProcedures2001‑1of3. aspx. [Last accessed on 2013 May 04; Last updated on 2001 Nov 03].
  31. Saudi Commission for Health Specialties: Training Program for Saudi Specialty Certificate in Forensic Medicine. Available from: http://www.arabic.scfhs.org.sa/new/fellowship_arabia_file/SB‑4. pdf. [Last accessed on 2013 May 04; Last updated on 2012 Nov 03].
  32. Federal Evidence Review: Federal Rules of Evidence; 2013. Available from: http://www.federalevidence.com/ rules‑of‑evidence#Rule702. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 19; Last updated on 2013 Jan 01].
  33. National Justice Compqania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Company Limited: (Also known as tge “Ikarian Reefer” case): N[1993] 2 Lloyds Rep 68. Available from: http://www. simplymalaysia.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/national-justicecompania- naviera-sa-v-prudential-assurance-co-ltd.pdf. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 19; Last updated on 2011 Nov 01].
  34. The General Dental Council, 37 Wimpole Street, London, W1G 8DQ. Available from: http://www‑gdc‑uk.org. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 19; Last updated on 2013 Mar 19].
  35. British Society for Forensic Odontology British Society for Forensic Odontology (BAFO). Available from: http://www.bafo.org. uk. [Last accessed on 2013 Mar 19; Last updated on 2013 Mar 19].
  36. Kolczynski PJ. How to Be A Successful Expert Witness, ExpertPages.com’s Knowledge Base; 1997. Available from: http:// www.expertpages.com/news/how_to_be_a_successful_expert_ wi.htm. [Last accessed on 2012 Sep 23].