Correlative study on lip prints, fingerprints, and mandibular intercanine distance for gender determination


J Sonia Bai
A Prakash
A Simha Reddy
M Rajinikanth
S Sreenath
K Kumar Reddy


Context: “Identity” is a set of physical characteristics, functional or psychic, normal or pathological, that defines an individual. Identification of an individual is a crucial and an exigent task in forensic investigation. Aims: The aim of the present pilot study was to investigate the accuracy of various methods employed in gender determination such as lip prints, mandibular canine index (MCI), fingerprints, and correlation between them. Subjects and Methods: The pilot study group consisted of 300 samples aged between 18 and 25 years. Lip prints, fingerprints, and impressions of lower mandibular arches were collected. Statistical Analysis Used: The results were analyzed using Chi-square test for lip prints and fingerprints with an independent sample t-test for the MCI. Intergroup comparison between the parameters was analyzed by ANNOVA test. Results: Type II lip print pattern and loop pattern of fingerprints were the predominant patterns in both males and females, and mesiodistal width of right MCI has greater sexual dimorphism than left MCI. Conclusions: Although lip prints, fingerprints, and MCI had their own specifications, correlation of the three parameters did not show any significance.


How to Cite
J Sonia Bai, A Prakash, A Simha Reddy, M Rajinikanth, S Sreenath, & K Kumar Reddy. (2018). Correlative study on lip prints, fingerprints, and mandibular intercanine distance for gender determination. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 10(3), 143–150.


  1. Verma P, Sachdeva SK, Verma KG, Saharan S, Sachdeva K. Correlation of lip prints with gender, ABO blood groups and intercommissural distance. N Am J Med Sci 2013;5:427‑31.
  2. Ahuja P, Manchanda A. Application of oral hard and soft tissue structures in sex determination. Internet J Forensic Sci 2009; 4.
  3. Mutalik VS, Menon A, Jayalakshmi N, Kamath A, Raghu AR. Utility of cheiloscopy, rugoscopy, and dactyloscopy for human identification in a defined cohort. J Forensic Dent Sci 2013;5:2‑6.
  4. Srilekha N, Anuradha A, Vijay Srinivas G, Devi RS. Correlation among lip print pattern, finger print pattern and ABO blood group. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:49‑51.
  5. Hosmani JV, Nayak RS, Kotrashetti VS. Reliability of mandibular canines as indicators for sexual dichotomy. J Int Oral Health 2013;5:1‑7.
  6. Padmavati K, Vakar M, Afroz A, Ather S. Mandibular canine index – A tool for sex determination. J Int Dent Antrophol 2011;1:18‑20.
  7. Tandon A, Sircar K, Chowdhry A, Babiani D. Comparative analysis of lip and finger print patterns for sex determination. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2013;31:120.
  8. Nagasupriya A, Dhanapal R, Reena K, Saraswathi T, Ramachandran C. Patterns – “A crime solver”. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:3‑7.
  9. Sangam MR, Babu AR, Krupadanam K, Anasuya K. Finger print pattern in different blood groups. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2011; 33.
  10. Sandhu SV, Bansal H, Monga P, Bhandari R. Study of lip print pattern in a Punjabi population. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;4:24‑8.
  11. Randhawa K, Narang RS, Arora PC. Study of the effect of age changes on lip print pattern and its reliability in sex determination. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2011;29:45‑51.
  12. Sivapathasundharam B, Prakash PA, Sivakumar G. Lip prints (cheiloscopy). Indian J Dent Res 2001;12:234‑7.
  13. Tsuchihashi Y. Studies on personal identification by means of lip prints. Forensic Sci 1974;3:233‑48.
  14. Kücken M, Newell AC. Fingerprint formation. J Theor Biol 2005;235:71‑83.
  15. Muller M, Lupi‑Pegurier L, Quatrehomme G, Bolla M. Odontometrical method useful in determining gender and dental alignment. Forensic Sci Int 2001;121:194‑7.
  16. Kaushal S, Patnaik VV, Sood V, Agnihotri G. Sex determination in North Indians using mandibular canine index. JIAFM 2004;26. ISSN 0971-0973.
  17. Alvarez Segui M, Miquel Feucht M, Castello Ponce A, Verdu Pascual F. Persistent lipsticks and their lip prints: New hidden evidence at the crime scene. Forensic Sci Int 2000;112:41‑7.
  18. Sudesh Gungadin MB. Sex determination from fingerprint ridge density. Internet J Med Update 2007;2.
  19. Namouchi I. Anthropological significance of dermatoglyphic trait variation: An intra‑Tunisian population analysis. Int J Modern Anthropol 2011;1:12‑27.
  20. Wijerathne BT, Rathnayake GK, Adikari SC, Amarasinghe S, Abhayarathna PL, Jayasena AS. Sexual dimorphism in digital dermatoglyphic traits among Sinhalese people in Sri Lanka. J Physiol Anthropol 2013;32:27.
  21. Yuwanati M, Karia A, Yuwanati M. Canine tooth dimorphism: An adjunct for establishing sex identity. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012;4:80‑3.
  22. Hashim HA, Murshid ZA. Mesiodistal tooth width. A comparison between Saudi males and females. Part 1. Egypt Dent J 1993;39:343‑6.