Tooth reconstruction in forensic situations through dental materials: An anatomical art


Gargi Jani
Abraham Johnson


Introduction: Dental identification is a frequently applied method of forensic investigation, in mass disasters, accidents, and criminal investigations, where the human remains are decomposed, charred, or skeletonized. However, in such events, teeth may dislodge due to postmortem loss or mishandling during transporting and packaging which may further hamper with the identification of an individual. Aim: To investigate the potential for reconstruction of missing teeth utilizing dental materials. Subjects and Methods: Impressions of the intra-alveolar morphology of the empty sockets of a mandible were taken utilizing different impression materials. Positive replicas were prepared, and the profile of the missing/absent dental roots and crowns was constructed. Standardized radiographs were taken to assess the reliability of the method. Results: Based on the subjective observation, the combination of light body and heavy body (Putty)-addition silicone (for negative replica), self-cure (pink-colored) resin (for positive replica), and flowable composite resin (for reconstruction) gave the best outcome among the materials used. Conclusion: Tooth reconstruction utilizing dental materials that may help in comparative identification.


How to Cite
Gargi Jani, & Abraham Johnson. (2018). Tooth reconstruction in forensic situations through dental materials: An anatomical art. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 10(3), 137–142.


  1. International Criminal Police Organization. Disaster Victim Identification Guide; 2014. Available from: https://www.interpol. int/INTERPOL‑expertise/Forensics/DVI‑Pages. [Last accessed on 2018 Sep 05].
  2. Saxena S, Sharma P, Gupta N. Experimental studies of forensic odontology to aid in the identification process. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2:69‑76.
  3. Senn DR, Weems RA. Manual of Forensic Odontology. 5th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.
  4. Oliveira RN, Melani RF, Antunes JL, Freitas ER, Galvão LC. Postmortem tooth loss in human identification processes. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2000;18:32‑6.
  5. Panaitescu V, Roşu M. Problems of forensic anthropological identification of carbonized human remains. Rom J Leg Med 2007;15:39‑44.
  6. Capeletti LR, Franco A, Reges RV, Silva RF. Technical note: Intra‑alveolar morphology assessed in empty dental sockets of teeth missing post‑mortem. Forensic Sci Int 2017;277:161‑5.
  7. Smith BC. Reconstruction of root morphology in skeletonized remains with postmortem dental loss. J Forensic Sci 1992;37:176‑84.
  8. Scott GR, Irish JD. Human Tooth Crown and Root Morphology; 2017. Available from: CBO9781316156629.[Last accessed on 2018 Sep 10].
  9. van der Meer DT, Brumit PC, Schrader BA, Dove SB, Senn DR. Root morphology and anatomical patterns in forensic dental identification: A comparison of computer‑aided identification with traditional forensic dental identification. J Forensic Sci 2010;55:1499‑503.
  10. Fereira JL, Fereira AE, Ortega AI. Methods for the analysis of hard dental tissues exposed to high temperatures. Forensic Sci Int 2008;178:119‑24.
  11. Merlati G, Savlo C, Danesino P, Fassina G, Menghini P. Further study of restored and un‑restored teeth subjected to high temperatures. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2004;22:34‑9.
  12. Franco A, Thevissen P, Coudyzer W, Develter W, Van de Voorde W, Oyen R, et al. Feasibility and validation of virtual autopsy for dental identification using the interpol dental codes. J Forensic Leg Med 2013;20:248‑54.
  13. Franco A, Thevissen P, Fieuws S, Souza PH, Willems G. Applicability of Willems model for dental age estimations in Brazilian children. Forensic Sci Int 2013;231:401.e1‑4.
  14. Ramanan N, Thevissen P, Fleuws S, Willems G. Dental age estimation in Japanese individuals combining permanent teeth and third molars. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2012;30:34‑9.
  15. Wilkinson C. Forensic Facial Reconstruction. Cambridge: University Press; 2004.