Comparison and Association of Dermatoglyphics and Dental Anomalies in Three Different Regional Populations of India: An Original Study

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Mar 29, 2021
https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/1/2021.703
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 13, Issue 1, January - April 2021

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Spinder Kour
MDS Oral Pathology, Private Practioner, Srinagar Kashmir
Neeraj Grover
Kalka Dental College, Partapur Road, Meerut – 250006, Uttar Pradesh
Nishant Singh
Reader, Divya Jyoti College of Dental Sciences Modinagar, Ghaziabad – 201204, Uttar Pradesh

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of our study was to investigate and find the association of dental anomalies with the dermatoglyphic pattern within three regional populations of India. Methods: The present study included 600 subjects. 200 from each population were selected randomly and examined for dental anomalies and their dermatoglyphic patterns were recorded. Statistical Analysis Used: The study was analyzed by a chi-square test. Results: One dental anomaly was consistently noted in all three populations. Out of 600 subjects, 40.8% had positional anomalies. Shoveling, congenitally missing teeth, and winging were seen significantly in North-Eastern (23.0%), Jammu & Kashmir (5%), and Western Uttar Pradesh (6%) population groups in order. The most common dermatoglyphic pattern seen in all three populations was an ulnar loop. Significant relation between shoveling and whorl pattern was seen in the North-Eastern population. The presence of rotation was significantly more among subjects with a whorl pattern. Conclusion: The study concluded that dermatoglyphics can be used as an indicator of few dental anomalies. It can help in identifying the gender, race of an unidentified person, and various diseases which are correlated with dental anomalies that can be detected earlier.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Kour, S., Neeraj Grover, & Nishant Singh. (2021). Comparison and Association of Dermatoglyphics and Dental Anomalies in Three Different Regional Populations of India: An Original Study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 13(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/1/2021.703
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Available from: http://www.importantindia.com/sitemapmisc.html
  2. Sengupta S. Tribes of North East India. ISBN: 81-212- 0463-1.
  3. Available from: http://travelagency.net
  4. Husain M. Geography of Jammu and Kahmir. Kashmir overseas association. Available from: www.koausa.org
  5. Srestha A, Marla Vinay, Sreshta S, Maharajan I.K. Developmental anomalies affecting morphology of teeth. A review. RSBO. 2015; 12(1):68-71 https://doi.org/10.21726/rsbo.v12i1.175 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21726/rsbo.v12i1.175
  6. Tikare S et al. Dermatoglyphics - A marker for malocclusion. IDJ. 2010; 60:300-304.
  7. Grošelj M, Jan J: Molar incisor hypomineralisation and dental caries among children in Slovenia. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013; 14:241-5.
  8. Mahajan VD. Legalization of fingerprints. Criminal Law Journal. 2004
  9. Gupta S, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence and distribution of selected developmental dental anomalies in an Indian population. Journal of Oral Science. 2011; 53(2):231-8. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.53.231 PMid:21712629 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.53.231
  10. Kathariya MD. Prevalence of dental anomalies in school going children in India. Journal of International Oral Health. 2013; 5(5):10-4
  11. Yassin M. Prevalence and distribution of selected dental anomalies among Saudi children in Abha, Saudi Arabia. J Clin Exp Dent. 2016; 8(5):e485-90. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.52870 PMid:27957258 PMCid:PMC5149079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.52870
  12. Vani VN, Saleh SM, Tubaigy FM, Idris AM. Prevalence of developmental dental anomalies among adult population of Jazan, Saudi Arabia. The Saudi Journal for Dental Research. 2016; 7:29-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjdr.2015.03.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjdr.2015.03.003
  13. Canger EM, Celenk P, Cankaya. Shovel-shaped incisors in the Black Sea region population of Turkey. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2014; 9:253-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jds.2013.04.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2013.04.012
  14. Uthaman C et al. Ethnic variation of selected dental traits in Coorg. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences. 2015; 7(3):180-3. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.172422 PMid:26816457 PMCid:PMC4714404 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.172422
  15. Nagraj T et al. Regional variation in incisor shoveling in Indian population. Journal of Advanced Clinical and Research Insights. 2015; 2:193-6. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.jcri.77 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.jcri.77
  16. Patil S, Doni B, Kaswan S, Rehman F. Prevalence of dental anomalies in Indian population. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013; 5(4):183-6. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51119 PMid:24455078 PMCid:PMC3892239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.51119
  17. Afify AR, Zawawi KH. The Prevalence of dental anomalies in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia. ISRN Dentistry. Article ID 837270. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/837270 PMid:22778974 PMCid: PMC3388344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/837270
  18. Vahid-Dastjerdi E, Borzabadi-Farahani A, Mahdian M, Amini N. Non-syndromic hypodontia in an Iranian orthodontic population. J Oral Sci. 2010; 52:455-61. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.455 PMid:20881340 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.455