Dental Age Estimation in HIV-infected Children Using Willems Method

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published May 30, 2023
https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/3/2021.660
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 13, Issue 3, September - December 2021

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Maryam Paknahad
Associate Professor, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Javad Garmabi
Postgraduate Student, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Seyedeh Shokufan Hosseini Heravi
Undergraduate Student, Student Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Hamidreza Pakshir
Professor, Orthodontics Department, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Mahsa Omidi
Assistant Professor, Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz

Abstract

Objective: HIV patients differ from other people in terms of dental age. Estimating the age of children abandoned due to HIV is crucial for forensic records. The present study aimed to compare HIV-infected children with healthy controls in terms of dental age using the Willems method. Methods: The study sample consisted of orthopantomograms of 40 HIV patients aged 5-16 years and 50 children aged 6-16 years as the control group. The HIV group included children with vertical infections who had received antiretroviral therapy. The Willems method was used to compare two groups in terms of dental age. Results: Dental age estimation in both HIV and control groups was overestimated using the Willems method. Nevertheless, the overestimation rate was approximately one month in the control group and less than two months in the HIV group, making the method widely applicable for estimating dental age in both healthy children and HIV patients. The dental age of the HIV-infected children was lower than that of the control group. Conclusion: This study indicated a lower dental age in the HIV-infected children compared to the control group. The results demonstrated that dental age estimation using Willems method closely approximated the chronological age of HIV patients.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Paknahad, M., Garmabi, J., Shokufan Hosseini Heravi, S., Pakshir, H., & Omidi, M. (2023). Dental Age Estimation in HIV-infected Children Using Willems Method. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 13(3), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.18311/jfds/13/3/2021.660
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Titinchi F and Behardien N. Dental development in a sample of South African HIV‐positive children. JSCiD. 2019; 39(2):135-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12353 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/scd.12353
  2. Possagno L-P, Franco A, Paranhos L-R and Grando L-J. Morphological analysis of the skeletal development in lateral cephalometric radiographs of HIV-infected children ongoing Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy. JMO Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 2018; 23(6):e691. https:// doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22610 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22610
  3. Kapila A, Chaudhary S, Sharma R, Vashist H, Sisodia S, Gupta A, et al. A review on: Hiv aids. IJoP. 2016; 4(3):69-73.
  4. de Souza RB, da Silva Assuncao LR, Franco A, Zaroni FM, Holderbaum RM and Fernandes A. Dental age estimation in Brazilian HIV children using Willems’ method. JFSI. 2015; 257:510.e1-e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.044 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.044
  5. Altan HO, Altan A, Bilgic F, Sozer OA and Damlar I. The applicability of Willems’ method for age estimation in southern Turkish children: A preliminary study. J of Forensic and Leg Med. 2016; 38:24-7. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.015
  6. Kermani M, Tabatabaei Yazdi F and Abed Haghighi M. Evaluation of the accuracy of Demirjian’s method for estimating chronological age from dental age in Shiraz, Iran: Using geometric morphometrics method. JC Research ED. 2019; 5(3):191-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.169
  7. Movahedian N, Abedi S and Memarpour M. Comparison of the Demirjian and root resorption methods to estimate dental age in radiographic images. JoDfC. 2018; 85(2):45-50.
  8. Ardakani F, Bashardoust N and Sheikhha M. The accuracy of dental panoramic radiography as an indicator of chronological age in Iranian individuals. JFO. 2007; 25(2):30-5.
  9. Sehrawat J and Singh M. Willems method of dental age estimation in children: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J of Forensic and Leg Med. 2017; 52:122-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.08.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.08.017
  10. Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Geserick G and Olze A. Age estimation of unaccompanied minors: Part I. General considerations. JFSI. 2006; 159:S61-S4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.017
  11. Eid R, Simi R, Friggi M and Fisberg M. Assessment of dental maturity of Brazilian children aged 6 to 14 years using Demirjian’s method. IJ of PD. 2002; 12(6):423-8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00403.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-263X.2002.00403.x
  12. Hegde R and Sood P. Dental maturity as an indicator of chronological age: radiographic evaluation of dental age in 6 to 13 years children of Belgaum using Demirjian methods. IJSPPD. 2002; 20(4):132-8.
  13. Mohammed RB, Sanghvi P, Perumalla KK, Srinivasaraju D, Srinivas J, Kalyan US, et al. Accuracy of four dental age estimation methods in southern Indian children. JCDR. 2015; 9(1):HC01. https://doi.org/10.7860/ JCDR/2015/10141.5495
  14. Alqerban A, Alrashed M, Alaskar Z and Alqahtani K. Age estimation based on Willems method versus country specific model in Saudi Arabia children and adolescents. JBOH. 2021; 21(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01707-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01707-9
  15. Cherian JM, Thomas AM, Kapoor S and Kumar R. Dental age estimation using Willems method: A cross-sectional study on children in a North Indian city. JOMFP. 2020; 24(2):383. https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_299_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_299_19
  16. Willems G, Van Olmen A, Spiessens B and Carels C. Dental age estimation in Belgian children: Demirjian’s technique revisited. JFS. 2001; 46(4):893-5. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS15064J DOI: https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS15064J
  17. Wang J, Ji F, Zhai Y, Park H and Tao J. Is Willems method universal for age estimation: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J of Forensic and Leg Med. 2017; 52:130-6. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.09.003
  18. Pinchi V, Norelli G-A, Pradella F, Vitale G, Rugo D and Nieri M. Comparison of the applicability of four odontological methods for age estimation of the 14 years legal threshold in a sample of Italian adolescents. JFO. 2012; 30(2):17.
  19. Javadinejad S, Sekhavati H and Ghafari R. A comparison of the accuracy of four age estimation methods based on panoramic radiography of developing teeth. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2015; 9(2):72-8. https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2015.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2015.015
  20. Buonora S, Nogueira S, Pone MV, Aloe M, Oliveira RH and Hofer C. Growth parameters in HIV-verticallyinfected adolescents on antiretroviral therapy in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. A of TP. 2008; 28(1):59-64. https://doi.org/10.1179/146532808X270699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/146532808X270699
  21. FernandesA, Cherubini K, Veeck EB, Grando LJ and Silva CL. Radiographic evaluation of the chronological development of permanent dentition in children infected with HIV. JCOI. 2007; 11(4):409-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0124-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0124-1
  22. Trigueiro M, Tedeschi‐Oliveira S, Melani R and Ortega K. An assessment of adverse effects of antiretroviral therapy on the development of HIV positive children by observation of dental mineralization chronology. J of Oral Path and Med. 2010; 39(1):35-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.2009.00856.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.2009.00856.x
  23. Kis HC, Gorurgoz C, Basol M, Canger EM and Oztas B. Evaluation of the Willems and Cameriere’s dental age estimation methods in Turkish children - A modified version of Cameriere’s method. JFSIR. 2020; 2:100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsir.2020.100105
  24. Franco A, de Oliveira MN, Campos Vidigal MT, Blumenberg C, Pinheiro AA and Paranhos LR. Assessment of dental age estimation methods applied to Brazilian children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JDMFR. 2021; 50(2):20200128. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200128
  25. El-Bakary AA, Hammad SM and Mohammed F. Dental age estimation in Egyptian children, comparison between two methods. J of Forensic and Leg Med. 2010; 17(7):363-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2010.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2010.05.008
  26. Movahedian N, Abedi S and Memarpour M. Comparison of the Demirjian and root resorption methods to estimate dental age in radiographic images. Journal of Dentistry for Children. 2018; 85(2):45-50.
  27. Priya E. Applicability of Willem’s Method of Dental Age Assessment in 14 Years Threshold Children in South India-A Pilot Study. JoFR. 2015; (S4):1. https://doi. org/10.4172/2157-7145.1000S4-002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7145.1000S4-002