Exfoliative cytology: A possible tool in age estimation in forensic odontology

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Devi Shetty
Vijay Wadhwan
Kaveri Khanna
Anshi Jain
Amit Gupta

Abstract

Introduction: Age determination of unknown human bodies is important in the setting of a crime investigation or a mass disaster because the age at death, birth date, and year of death as well as gender can guide investigators to the correct identity among a large number of possible matches. Objective: The study was undertaken with an aim to estimate the age of an individual from their buccal smears by comparing the average cell size using image analysis morphometric software. Materials and Methods: Buccal smears were collected from 100 apparently healthy individuals. After fixation in 95% alcohol, the smears were stained using standard Papanicolaou laboratory procedure. The average cell size was measured using Dewinter′s image analysis software version 4.3. Statistical analysis of the data was done using one-way ANOVA, Bonferroni procedures. Results: The results showed significant decrease in average cell size of individual with increase in age. The difference was highly significant in age group of above 60 years. Conclusion: Age-related alterations are observed in buccal smears.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Devi Shetty, Vijay Wadhwan, Kaveri Khanna, Anshi Jain, & Amit Gupta. (2015). Exfoliative cytology: A possible tool in age estimation in forensic odontology. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 7(1), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.150321

References

  1. Sakuma A, Ohtani S, Saitoh H, Iwase H. Comparative analysis of aspartic acid racemization methods using whole‑tooth and dentin samples. Forensic Sci Int 2012;216:88-91.
  2. Prieto JL, Landa MI. Forensic age estimation in unaccompanied minors and young living adults forensic medicine. From Old Problems to New Challenges 2011. p. 78-121.
  3. Willems G. Areview of most commonly used dental age estimation techniques. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2001;19:9-17.
  4. Reddy SV, Kumar SG, Vezhavendhan PN. Cytomorphometric analysis of normal exfoliative cells from buccal mucosa in different age groups. Int J Clin Dent Sci 2011;2:22-5.
  5. Anuradha A, Sivapathasundharam B. Image analysis of normal exfoliated gingival cells. Indian J Dent Res 2007;18:63-6.
  6. Mc Connell G. A Manual of Pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1915. p. 56.
  7. Hande AH, Chaudhary MS. Cytomorphometric analysis of buccal mucosa of tobacco chewers. Rom J Morphol Embryol 2010;51:527-32.
  8. Hegde V. Cytomorphometric analysis of squames from oral premalignant and malignant lesions. J Clin Exp Dent 2011; 3:441-4.
  9. Suvarna M, Anuradha C, Kiran Kumar K, Chandra Sekhar P, Lalith Prakash Chandra K, Ramana Reddy BV. Cytomorphometric analysis of exfoliative buccal cells in type II diabetic patients. J NTR Univ Health Sci 2012;1:33-7.
  10. Cowpe JG, Longmore RB, Green MW. Quantitative exfoliative cytology of abnormal oral mucosal smears. J R Soc Med 1988;81:509-13.