Evaluation of the efficacy of titanium plates as denture markers under various heat sources and pressure - An in vitro study

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Suganya Srinivasan
Ahila Chidhambaranathan
Muthukumar Balasubramanian
Bejoy Mony Chidhambaram Mony
Ramesh Reddy

Abstract

Introduction: Denture Markers are used as one of the main identifying aid in mass disasters. Dental description of missing person in mass disasters plays a vital role in forensic research. Difficulties arise when the teeth are missing. In such situation the prosthodontic identification (ID) of replaced teeth becomes the priority. Till recently, there was no development of denture marker that could withstand massive fire accidents. Aim: To determine the use of titanium chips with identity code engraved on it as denture markers that could withstand high temperature and pressure. Materials and Methods: Wax patterns were fabricated with identity code moulded on a rubber stamp. It was invested and casted with titanium. Titanium chips were inserted into the polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) block and subjected to various heat treatments. Results: There was no loss of identity when subjected to 1,500°C overnight but only residues left under pressure of 200 kg/cm 3 . Conclusion: The literature recommends the metallic denture markers in order to withstand the post morten assaults. Titanium denture markers could be a preferred option as it can withstand high temperatures under pressure also.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Suganya Srinivasan, Ahila Chidhambaranathan, Muthukumar Balasubramanian, Bejoy Mony Chidhambaram Mony, & Ramesh Reddy. (2015). Evaluation of the efficacy of titanium plates as denture markers under various heat sources and pressure - An in vitro study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 7(1), 59–62. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.150320

References

  1. Article 6 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ index.shtml#a6 [Last cited on 2015 Jan 21] .
  2. Berry FA, Logan GI, Plata R, Riegel R. Apostfabrication technique foridentification of prosthetic devices. JProsthet Dent 1995;73:341‑3.
  3. Bengtsson A, Olsson T, Rene N, Carlsson GE, Dahlbom U, Borrman H. Frequency of edentulism and identification marking of removable denturesin long-term care units. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:520-3.
  4. de Valck E. The dentist as an expert in disasters: Dental identification in the disasters with the Zeebrugge ferry. Rev Belge Med Dent 1990;45:11-20.
  5. Lose FM. Denture identification. J Prosthet Dent 1958;8:940.
  6. Turner CH, FletcherAM, Ritchie GM. Denture marking and human identification. Br Dent J 1976;141:114‑7.
  7. Vestermark J. Identification from dental disasters. Int J Forensic Dent 1975;3:3-6.
  8. Richmond R, Pretty IA. Contemporary methods of labeling dental prostheses--a review of the literature. J Forensic Sci 2006;51:1120-6.
  9. V Padmanaban, Gupta KR. Denture marking-An introduction and review. J Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1:11-6.
  10. Haines DH. Identification in mass disasters from dental prostheses. Int J Forensic Dent 1973;1:11-5.
  11. Haines DH. Dental identification in the Rijeka air disaster. Forensic Sci 1972;1:313-21.
  12. Borrman H, Thomas CJ, Engstrom EU. Denture marking. Clinical andtechnical aspects. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1995;13:14-7.
  13. Borrman HI, DiZinno JA, Wasen J, Rene N. On denture marking. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1999;17:20-6.
  14. Wong B, Fogel C, Galan D, Krochak B. Denture identification: The University of Manitoba’s denture identification service. J Can Dent Assoc 1992;58:743-6.
  15. Masterton LW, Hurley NC. Chemistry: Principles and Reactions. 6th ed. Stamford, USA: Cengage Learning; 2008. p. 18.
  16. Donachie JM Jr. TITANIUM: ATechnical Guide. Metals Park, OH: ASM International; 1988. p. 11.
  17. “Titanium”. Encyclopædia Britannica; 2006. Available from: http:// www.Brittanica. com. [Last accessed on 2006 Dec 29].
  18. Kamath PG, Kamath VG. Engraved fixed restorations and denture micro-labelling to facilitate identification through forensic dentistry. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2005;5:79-81.
  19. Bowers CM, Johansen RJ. Forensic dental evidence: An investigator’s Handbook: Analysis of Bite Mark Evidence. In: JohansenRJ, Bowers CM, editors. 1st ed. Santa Barbara, CA: Elsevier Publication, Forensic Imaging Services; 2003. p. 155-7.
  20. Whittaker DK. A colour atlas of forensic dentistry. Saint‑Louis: Harcourt; 1989.
  21. Thomas CJ, van Wyk CW. The palatal rugae in identification. J Forensic Odontostomatol 1988;6:21-7.
  22. Rajan M, Julian R. A new method of marking dentures using microchips. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2002;20:1-5.
  23. Colvenker SS. Lenticular card: A new method for denture identification. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21:112‑4.
  24. Available from: http://www. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_ Channel_Tunnel_fire [Last accessed on 2013 Dec 05].