Applicability of Berry′s index in bite mark analysis

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Apr 1, 2015
https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.150299%20
Download
pdf
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 7, Issue 1, January-April 2015

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Palathottungal Antony
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Ernakulam, Kerala
Karthigakannan Pillai
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Ernakulam, Kerala
Giju George
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Ernakulam, Kerala
Thomas Varghese
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Ernakulam, Kerala
Mohammed Puthalath
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Ernakulam, Kerala
Leena Arakkal
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Mar Baselios Dental College, Kothamangalam, Ernakulam, Kerala

Abstract

Objectives: This study attempts to highlight the usefulness of applying Berry′s Index as an adjuvant to support and aid in bite analysis. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted among 100 students between the ages of 18-30 from Mar Baselios Dental Collage, Kothamangalam. Out of the 100 subjects, there were 50 males and 50 females. The data obtained was tabulated and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Version 16 (SPSS). Results: The mean value of the width of the upper central incisor for male and female was 0.7602 cm and 0.7765 cm respectively. The mean value of the bizygomatic width for male and female was 12.54 cm and 12.42 cm respectively. The correlation between the upper central incisor width and the bizygomatic width was inferred to have a good positive correlation with a value 0f 0.613. Pearson correlation coefficient with greater correlation between the upper central incisor width and the bizygomatic width in female patient (r = 0.678) compared with male patient (r = 0. 525). Conclusion: Berry′s Index can be a useful adjuvant to bite analysis by providing a means of determining the facial proportions of an individual from the width of the central incisors.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Palathottungal Antony, Karthigakannan Pillai, Giju George, Thomas Varghese, Mohammed Puthalath, & Leena Arakkal. (2015). Applicability of Berry′s index in bite mark analysis. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 7(1), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.150299
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Stimson PG, Mertz CA. Forensic dentistry. New York: CRC Press; 1997. p. 1-45.
  2. Acharya AB, Sivapathasundharam B. Forensic odontology. In: Rajendran R, Sivapathasundharam B, editors. Shafer’s Textbook of Oral Pathology. 5th ed. New Delhi: Elsevier; 2006. p. 1199-1227.
  3. Kaur H, Chattopadhyay PK. Identification from bite marks a study in fifty individuals. Indian Anthropol 1993;23:59‑66.
  4. Barker BR. The history of forensic dentistry. In: Cottone JA, Standish SM. Outline of Forensic Dentistry. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1982.
  5. Barsley ER. The scope of forensic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1993;13:133-56.
  6. Rothwell BR. Bite marks in forensic dentistry: A review of legal, scientific issues. J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:223‑32.
  7. Saxena S, Sharma P, Gupta N. Experimental studies of forensic odontology to aid in the identification process. J Forensic Dent Sci 2010;2:69-76.
  8. Gomes VL, Goncalves LC, do Prado CJ, JuniorIL, de Lima Lucas B. Correlation between facial measurements and the mesiodistal width of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006;18:196-205.
  9. Rai B, Kaur J, Anand SC, Singh J. Accuracy of Balwant Rai regression equation on age estimation of human foetus. Indian J Forensic Med Pathol 2008;1:57-60.
  10. Kramer RS, Jones AL, Ward R. A lack of sexual dimorphism in the width-to-height ratio in white European faces using 2D photographs, 3D scans and anthropometry. PLoS One 2012;7:e42705.
  11. Sweet D, Hildebrand D. Recovery of DNA from human teeth by cryogenic grinding. J Forensic Sci 1998;43:1199-202.
  12. Pretty IA, Sweet D. A look at forensic dentistry-Part 1: The role of teeth in the determination of human identity. Br Dent J 2001;190:359-66.
  13. Andersen L, Juhl M, Solheim T, Borrman H. Odontological identification of fire victims‑‑potentialities and limitations. Int J Legal Med 1995;107:229-34.
  14. Sweet D, DiZinno JA. Personal identification through dental evidence – tooth fragments to DNA. J Calif Dent Assoc 1996;24:35-42.
  15. Clark MA, Sandusky GE, Hawley DA, Pless JE, Fardal PM, et al. Fatal and near-fatal animal bite injuries. J Forensic Sci 1991;36:1256-61.
  16. Michaud SG, Aynesworth H. The only living witness: The true story of serial sex killer ted bundy. Irving: Authorlink Press; 1999.
  17. Van der Velden A, Spiessens M, Wilems G. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2006;24:14-7.
  18. Berry FH. Study of prosthetic art. Dent Mag 1905;1:405.
  19. Oksam CL, Premachandra IM, Dias GJ. Bizygomatic breadth determination in damaged skulls. Int J Osteoarchaeol 2010;20:540-8.
  20. Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: Facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:530-8.