Baseline data of facial parameters in the population of Haryana: An anthropometric study

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Shruti Gupta
Anjali Narwal
Mala Kamboj
Pooja Sharma
Vanshika Makkar
Rahul Raman

Abstract

Context: Anthropometry plays an important role in the assessment of ethnicity and identification of an individual. There is paucity of literature on various facial parameters in Haryanvi population. Thus, the present study was an initiation to collect this database in Haryanvi population. Aim: The aim of the present study was to create a database of craniofacial parameters of Haryanvi population. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 300 individuals of Haryanvi ethnicity. A digital vernier caliper was used for the measurement of facial parameters. Statistical Analysis: Chi-square test, t-test, and Pearson's correlation test were used for finding the difference between the measurements for various parameters. Results: In the present study, mesoprosopic was the predominant facial phenotype in both males and females. A significant sexual dimorphism was found between all the facial parameters measured in the study. However, upper facial height and facial index did not follow the same pattern in relation to gender determination. Conclusion: Based on the present study findings, we conclude that craniofacial parameters could be used as an important tool to assess the ethnicity and gender of an individual. In addition, our data could be used as a baseline for further studies in the identification of a Haryanvi individual.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Shruti Gupta, Anjali Narwal, Mala Kamboj, Pooja Sharma, Vanshika Makkar, & Rahul Raman. (2019). Baseline data of facial parameters in the population of Haryana: An anthropometric study. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, 11(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_12_19

References

  1. Kanchan T, Krishan K. Personal identification in forensic examinations. Anthropology 2013;2:114.
  2. Khan N, Leela V, Annapuravu G. A study of craniofacial anthropometrics in Hyderabad (Deccan) and a review of literature. J Med Allied Sci 2012;2:54‑7.
  3. Hatwal P, Atal DK, Das S. Correlation of upper facial and lower facial height in Garhwali population of Uttarakhand. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2015;37:281‑2.
  4. Shetti RV, Pai SR, Sneha GK, Gupta C, Chethan P, Soumya. Study of prosopic (facial) index of Indian and Malaysian students. Int J Morphol 2011;29:1018‑21.
  5. Adamu LH, Ojo SA, Danborno B, Adebissi SS, Taura MG. Sex determination using facial linear dimensions and angles among Hausa population of Kano State, Nigeria. Egypt J Forensic Sci 2016;6:459‑67.
  6. Agnihotri AK, Kachhwaha S, Googoolye K, Allock A. Estimation of stature from cephalo‑facial dimensions by regression analysis in indo‑Mauritian population. J Forensic Leg Med 2011;18:167‑72.
  7. Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Forrest CR, Alt KW, Bagic I, Baltadjiev G, et al. International anthropometric study of facial morphology in various ethnic groups/races. J Craniofac Surg 2005;16:615‑46.
  8. Williams P, Dyson M, Dussak JE, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, et al. Gray’s Anatomy. 38th ed. London: Churchill Livingston; 1995. p. 607-12.
  9. Adebisi S. Forensic anthropology in perspective: The current trend. Internet J Forensic Sci 2008;4.
  10. Mostafa A, Banu LA, Rahman F, Paul S. Craniofacial anthropometric profile of adult Bangladeshi Buddhist Chakma females. J Anthropol 2013;2013.
  11. Kumar M, Lone MM. The study of facial index among Haryanvi adults. Int J Sci Res 2013;2:51‑3.
  12. Prasanna LC, Bhosale S, D’Souza AS, Mamatha H, Thomas RH, Sachin K. Facial indices of North and South Indian adults: Reliability in stature estimation and sexual dimorphism. J Clin Diagn Res 2013;7:1540‑2.
  13. Baral P, Lobo SW, Menezes RG, Kanchan T, Krishan K, Bhattacharya S, et al. An anthropometric study of facial height among four endogamous communities in the Sunsari district of Nepal. Singapore Med J 2010;51:212‑5.
  14. Obaidi HA. Variation of facial heights among the class I, II and III dentoskeletal relationships (cephalometric study). Al Rafidain Dent J 2006;6:98‑105.
  15. Jagadish Chandra H, Ravi MS, Sharma SM, Rajendra Prasad B. Standards of facial esthetics: An anthropometric study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2012;11:384‑9.
  16. Pandey AK. Cephalo‑facial variation among Onges. Anthropologist 2006;8:245‑9.
  17. Shah T, Patel MN, Nath S, Menon SK. Determination of sex using cephalo‑facial dimensions by discriminant function and logistic regression equations. Egypt J Forensic Sci 2016;6:114‑9.
  18. Kataria DS, Ranjan RK, Perwaiz SA. Study of variation in total facial index of North Indian population. Int J Health Sci Res 2015;5:122‑7.
  19. Omotoso DR, Oludiran OO, Sakpa CL. Nasofacial anthropometry of adult Bini Tribe in Nigeria. Afr J Biomed Res 2011;14:219‑21.
  20. Jeremic D, Kocic S, Vulovic M, Sazdanovic M, Sazdanovic P, Jovanovic B, et al. Anthropometric study of the facial index in the population of central Serbia. Arch Biol Sci 2013;65:1163‑8.